chalamadad,

Don't take this the wrong way, but I see nothing extraordinary in those scope shots. They are typical of what we've been seeing. Are you going through a FWBR?

It is apparent from the second and third scope shots that only the positive excursion is seeing a load. Is the FWBR connected properly?

.99

Quote from: slapper on July 09, 2011, 02:26:55 PM
ok thanks. in your schematic, reply #4134, your bridge is not connected to the circuit correctly, conventionally speaking.

your output(?) cap is connected across what normally would be the ac input and your coils are connected as the dc output.

thanks again.

nap

Slapper, you are correct.  I have made another mistake.

Sorry, I am not an EE.  It has been a long time since I have been demanded to draw a circuit diagram and I totally blew the FWBR.  I hope this forum will let me edit to remove the incorrect one. 

Corrected schematic for the scope shots is also below.

Thank you very much for pointing out my mistake.  I would hate to be giving out disinformation.

M.

Quote from: poynt99 on July 09, 2011, 02:33:30 PM
chalamadad,

Don't take this the wrong way, but I see nothing extraordinary in those scope shots. They are typical of what we've been seeing. Are you going through a FWBR?

It is apparent from the second and third scope shots that only the positive excursion is seeing a load. Is the FWBR connected properly?

.99

No problem. I am really no electrical engineer (more on the digital side of life), so I just want to make sure I am not missing something important here. No FWBR, was just trying the sonedi circuit. Half load is ok.

Coil is bifilar, by the way.

Quote from: mondrasek on July 09, 2011, 02:39:47 PM
[snip]Corrected schematic for the scope shots is also below.[\snip]

thank you mondrasek.

so probe 1 ground is connected as you show in your schematic. is your probe 2 ground connected to anything?

i'm not saying both grounds need to be connected, if the probes are connected to non-isolated channels.

take care.

nap

@pointy...erh, uhm, poynt99,

I was wondering if your simulation specialties could be requested for this latest RomeroUK Muller idea?  I know you have electrical circuits mastered in simulations.  But can you do these moving EM interactions?  I mean, particularly this case:  WTF is happening when we place a backing magnet?  The only theory that I have now is @Hoptoads explanation of the shift of the Bloch wall.  But one thing that is lacking from his explanation is the mathematical predictability of how much Gauss at what distance (and maybe offset relative to coil center?) makes what difference.

Poynt99, do you have the facilities to investigate these variables?  And, if not, do you know who does?

Et al, if you can support the above questions, please let us all know.

@Hoptoad, your Adam's work and writeup are excellent.  Thank you very much for that amazing effort.  I was directed to your site from this RomeroUK thread several weeks ago and was inspired. I have planning to research the Adam's motor further.

M.