Quote from: mondrasek on July 27, 2011, 06:12:06 PM
Taking some of my own advice, I noticed that my primary Toshiba laptop PS brick was still attached to my power regulator circuit with 24" alligator clip leads.  Before removing those leads, RPM with the current light bulb load was 1820.  After removing them (connecting the PS brick coax more directly to the circuit), RPM was 1880.

Any wires in the vicinity of this device should be picking up EM noise, AFAIK.  You need to adjust and/or account for this noise.

M.

Just a thought I mentioned many pages back and I believe bolt agreed with me that making sure NOTHING is grounded in your setup may be important in achieving OU.  This has been mentioned in other experiments that found grounding killed any OU.  I'm not saying that will be the case here but it's an easy thing to try by simply using battery only power in your various tests. 

BTW - IMO ignore Milehigh.  I really think he's got a very destructive intent.  If you understand the power of belief (as now proven in the old Pons and Fleischmann cold fusion replication failures) then you will know what I am talking about. 

hi Resopnanceman

the way to use super glue is get small amount of blacks sand or magnetite, drop it into center of aircoil already wound, and drip super glue in there, saturate the core materil withit making it wet...drop some more blacks sand and drip more super glue and jsut keep building it up unitl through...smash the glue/blacksand mix down with stick or somethign as you go  - squish it in between the winds so you have lots of surface area of the core to the windings... super glue wont stick to most metals very well or teflon ...epoxy gets really hot too when it cures....the type of epoxy they sell for electonic encapsulement has low temperature cure

Quote from: mondrasek on July 27, 2011, 06:06:35 PM
That would require a complete tear down.  So I am not inclined, right now.  But I welcome any input from others who can easily test both arrangements.

Right hand rule:  If you grasp one coil so that your fingers wrap in the direction of the coil, the current should flow in the direction of your outstretched thumb.

How do you get current in the second coil going the opposite direction?  You flip the coil/hand.

I am not 100% sure if the fact that the rotor magnet's different N and S poles are facing the different coils in this arrangement makes any difference.  But I don't think it affects current.  Only voltage.

Please let me know if I have gone off track.

M.

Don't change the coil direction, just try the cabling. Go from coil #1 - bottom to top and from there to coil #2 top to bottom.

Quote
FYI, I don't know what is worse:
The attacks from the "debunkers" (got my e-mail from Milehigh!  So did X).

Or the silence from y'all.
Please let me know if I am off track here.

M.

I am personally very disatisfied from the stance Romero has kept so far.

Initially he came up with this Muller OU selfrunner device claiming and showing in video how he achieved OU nice and simple. ( i have told before Romero in his old site claimed many times OU in the past but after my replication, inquires and persistance i debunk them and he went silent and eventually he agreed that he miscalculated in most cases. But not a selfrunner ever suggested there just calculations)

when he presented his initial findings clearly suggesting OU, i told him his is clacultaing wrong. Especially the first vid with the heavy battery voltage drop. Then he rushed and assembled the self runner and my hat came off.

In the very first pages of this thread, every aspect of the self runner  (from wire to magnet specs) was thoroughly discussed by Romero and other member's here, and a successful replcation was thought like a more or less simple issue having all info in hand.\
Romero in the begining said people should refrain from much theories and just replicate.

Replications came abudantly, yet one after the other failed to achieve the extraordinary. Now come suggstions from Romero that the initial info is not complete, but instead of series adding voltage coils those should be bucking, etc etc ect.

The story of the life of this forum...

Personally, i give 0 credibility to Romero and his device having failed to be a real world one, and i apologize to prompt anyone at spending resources (e.g. instead of spending them in summer holidays) uless you enjoyed the ride.

Baroutologos... off

Quote from: xenomorphlabs on July 27, 2011, 08:12:10 PM
In futuristic's diagram the two coils are wound in different ways.

If it does that it's because my bad drawing skills.
That sketch is from year 2003 when I did Garry Stanley bicycle motor replication.
If you take two identical (floppy drive) coils and flip one around you get lenz-less drive coil.
Due to clever coil setup no current gets induced when magnet approaches so no lenz force...

@MO:
Keep up the good work, it's really great to see your progression.