Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 310 Guests are viewing this topic.

konehead

Hi Chal

Yes I am still a bit confused still - you are saying to short at one peaks but "unshort" at other?
How can it unshort if its already been shorted at other peak??

do yoy mean to leave ON (closed)  the short for the whole sinewave??? 

then un-short at next sinewave peak??

sorry I ams ure it is simple I just dont get it...I guess not sure exactly what it means to "unshort"

Maybe you mean have the timing of the openinig of the swtihc be at one peak?
and the closing of the switch at the other peak,
but still wiht very short pulse width;
so one peak is slightly advanced (unshorted-switch opened) to TDC and other is slightly retarded to TDC (shorted- swithclosed)???


chalamadad

Hi Kone,

I am not sure if it double latches or shorts and unshorts at the peaks of the wave. I was thinking it was shorting at the lower peak and unshorting at the upper peak because of the flattened out part inbetween. I had the high voltage spikes exactly at the upper and lower peak of the wave. It is more important to interpret or resemble the waveform I posted in the drawing above: one half from peak to peak is flat and the other one is near sine wave. I had exactly this waveform when I had best output using a reed switch. This was also when I had the speedup by shortin the DC output. If we can interpret the flat part as that there is then no magnetic field then there will be no drag at that point. If this is happening when the rotor magnet wants to escape I think this is what we want.

mariuscivic

Hi Konehead
0.75 miliseconds=750microseconds right?
i still get drag for 200-150 microseconds. Also noticed that the spikes are not so high when shorting for 200 microseconds

konehead

Hi Chal

OK that is what I got when I tested your idea too, with a long pulse widht, you dont have the swtich closed at the peaks, shorting the coil, instead you have it start to OPEN there....(and close on the toehr too is your idea) and I see what you mean now - but I dont think this is good way to do it.
You should in konehead-logic and method,, have ultra-short puulse widht that just shorts at both the neg and pos peaks - all the rest of the time the switch is open..
Now, if you had a coil and motor for it that ACCELERATESS under a shorted load, then that is whole different ball game for sure! - in that case it is probably better to do as you did, leave the coil shorted for very long period, and find good spot to open swithc, if at all, such as filling a huge UF cap which works like a shorted-condition

konehead

Hi Mariu
1 second = 1000 milliseconds...microseconds is one-millionth of second (10 to the 6th):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsecond