Howdy all,

I just wanted to get this right Rosemary .....

You fabricate a fraudulent YouTube video showing a schematic for a device not shown or demonstrated in the video ....Then you claim that the person "dooziedont" that up-loaded it wasn't you but someone else and you had nothing to do with the video, then admit you did actually up-load the YouTube video and dooziedont one of your many alias's is you.

You fabricated fraudulent documents that were submitted to accredited journals and magazines for possible peer review from academics, engineers or experts and a publication of your claim .... Then these documents have been exposed as having cherry picked inaccurate, erroneous, misrepresented, incomplete information and data, two totally different device schematics are shown one of which you say isn't or never was used in the testing and evaluation of your device and the documents authors referenced that didn't do any experimentation on the device referenced in those documents at all. The authors names with the appearance of possibly pulled from a hat or phone book used to give the documents a mystic illusion on verifable credibility of some unethical kind from your collection of imaginary experts involved.

You have made applications for prize money from OverUnity dot com, Over Unity Research dot com and Steven E Jones for your NERD RAT device that you claim is OVERUNITY and has a COP>INFINITY .... Then you claim you have nothing months later that you are offering information only on some new mystical magical mystery NERD RAT technology.

Your demands now Rosemary ....

You want this thread "Testing the TK TarBaby" locked because you feel totally successful in your misrepresented lame arguments that you are correct and everyone else world wide is wrong, proven by your personal collection of evidence on a theory you have created hacked together all relating to your unproven thesis throwing out and ignoring all excepted conventional proven published electrical theory's ..... Then you want your own thread here at OverUnity dot com, moderated by only yourself that you can cherry pick whats posted who says what with you attempting some new testing and evaluation on the "SAME" device circuit that has been already tested by you incorrectly and those results posted by you already in the threads "Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011" or "another small breakthrough on our NERD technology" and your prior testing results in those two threads duplicated in the "Testing the TK TarBaby"

Your insane .......

You said it, Fuzzy. She's up to her scraggly braids in contradictions and mendacity.

Let her have her own moderated thread with her as mod. I'd love to see it. It will be a hoot and a half _at least_.


Meanwhile, back in the DeepBunker...

As you all know I've been using a potentiometer/series resistor to interface whatever negative bias supply I'm using to the Tar Baby's FG+ and FG- connection points. Well... the cheap 1 megohm pot that I have been using is fried anyway and has to be turned all the way to the stop. So I've improved that system and unless otherwise noted I'll be using the pot/resistor scheme shown in the diagram below. It gives good adjustment with a supply of 6-9 volts. The CAPACITOR shown is what I used for my latest test video -- an unscheduled test, but we managed to fit it in anyway --, showing Tar Baby running on the capactor for its bias source... for a few seconds anyway. Clearly, though, the capacitor IS putting energy into the circuit and IS NOT being in any sense recharged or prevented from putting its power into the circuit.

This video is being processed and uploaded now. It should be available in half an hour or so. Meanwhile here's the schematic for the new potentiometer arrangement. The CAP is only there for this demo and whatever power source you like can be substituted for the Elenco precision regulated PS.

And... Testing Kontinues.

Here is a scope shot I just made. Top trace is across the CVR at 1 volt per division, centerline in the usual place. Bottom trace is "battery" at the board, 50 v/div, centerline at second graticle line up from bottom. (One line below its usual place.) Timebase 0.1 microsecond per division. Inline current indication is about 120 mA, battery voltage 49.4 volts, load heating normally.

I am pretty sure that this condition and these traces will give me a solidly negative mean power product. I'm too lazy to do the work by hand right now, but just eyeballing it, it sure looks like it to me.


Oh.... did I mention? This is using 5 x IRF830a mosfets.

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 06, 2012, 06:32:47 PM
You said it, Fuzzy. She's up to her scraggly braids in contradictions and mendacity.

Let her have her own moderated thread with her as mod. I'd love to see it. It will be a hoot and a half _at least_.


Meanwhile, back in the DeepBunker...

As you all know I've been using a potentiometer/series resistor to interface whatever negative bias supply I'm using to the Tar Baby's FG+ and FG- connection points. Well... the cheap 1 megohm pot that I have been using is fried anyway and has to be turned all the way to the stop. So I've improved that system and unless otherwise noted I'll be using the pot/resistor scheme shown in the diagram below. It gives good adjustment with a supply of 6-9 volts. The CAPACITOR shown is what I used for my latest test video -- an unscheduled test, but we managed to fit it in anyway --, showing Tar Baby running on the capactor for its bias source... for a few seconds anyway. Clearly, though, the capacitor IS putting energy into the circuit and IS NOT being in any sense recharged or prevented from putting its power into the circuit.

This video is being processed and uploaded now. It should be available in half an hour or so. Meanwhile here's the schematic for the new potentiometer arrangement. The CAP is only there for this demo and whatever power source you like can be substituted for the Elenco precision regulated PS.

TK,

The 670K is probably not needed.  You are basically varying Ibias by varying the resistor between the supply and Q2's source, which is the 100R variable in series with the 10R.  The 670K is not hurting anything either, however, just a bit more bleed when using the cap by itself.

You did use a "rechargeable" cap didn't you?

PW

It's a little scary when I see that a video I've posted gets some few views even before I've posted a link to it. Gratifying but a little scary anyway. I could never handle fame, not even fifteen seconds much less fifteen minutes of it.

Here's the link to the bias capacitor trial video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVdzTn4Iya0