Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 08, 2012, 11:35:28 PM
LOL

And guys, here's more of that SPIN.  TK's now trying to teach me the 'art of triggering'.  Just go back over some of his early videos and see where and why he had to learn the skill.  It's actually hilarious.

Kindest again,
Rosemary

Scrawny liar. Cite a definite reference and let's see if I need to "learn" any skill with respect to triggering.

While you are at it, liar, explain why YOUR scope is set to trigger where it is, and also explain why THAT LECROY is not stable in the video, but is hilariously dancing back and forth. 

IT IS BECAUSE ITS TRIGGER IS IMPROPERLY SET, you ignorant liar.

I have said what I know ... now YOU TELL ME WHY I AM WRONG. WHY IS THE TRIGGER SET WHERE IT IS IN THAT SCOPE SHOT?

You cannot tell me because you have no coherent reason.

When all else fails, put the witness on trial...

PW

And as for THIS!

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 08, 2012, 11:48:06 PM
Ainslie, now you are attacking the competence of people who are working in the industry, people with unquestioned competence in the areas you are bitching about.

As you have been doing through over 2000 posts.  I've LEARNED the trick from you Leon.  And the rule is this.  What's sauce for the gander is also sauce for the goose.

Rosie Pose

Some "power measurements" of the portable negative mean power oscillator:

With the battery probe at the old familiar (but erroneous) measurement point as shown in the schema01, the mean battery power is -4.2W.

We can "improve" this already improved negative mean by moving the "battery" probe to the MOSFET Drain as shown in schema02. At this point the mean battery power is -6.3W.

When the battery probe is moved to measure directly across the battery with a differential probe (not shown), the mean power computation is +0.133W. This is the "actual" battery power being delivered to the circuit. See last scope shot.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 08, 2012, 11:49:11 PM
Guys,

This is getting funnier by the minute.  TK REALLY does NOT know what's wrong with his math.  It's DELICIOUS.  Here's his quote preserved for 'posterity' as he puts it...

And here's his riposte...If this is me stomping my foot and holding my breath and turning purple when it's only from amusement.  And Leon... WHY should I have to explain where you are wrong?  You're the guy who can measure with a string and a piece of clay - and can perform huge feats of posting and filming and slandering - simultaneously - with or without the able assistance of HUMBUGGER.  Why should I need to tell you where you have 'ERRORED?  LOL

Rosie Pose

What's wrong with it then, Ainslie? You KNOW I would tell you what's wrong with yours.

Your scope trace shows substantial current flowing in your system. 320 milliamps is flowing THROUGH YOUR CVR and THROUGH YOUR LOAD and that's why it gets hot.  You have a problem with my calculations? CORRECT THEM THEN and tell us why that positive deflection ISN'T indicating a current. Are you using SOME OTHER SCHEMATIC? Is the DC current through a 0.25 ohm resistor NOT given by I = V/R ? Are you revising Ohm's Law as well as the definitions of the Joule and the Watt?

CORRECT MY CALCULATIONS or stop complaining about them.