My 'satirical' references, which may I add exempts it from 'calumny and slander' are merely references to 'height and length'.  WHY is that VULGAR?

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 14, 2012, 11:10:22 PM
And just WHO and WHERE did somebody say that any pickle was 72inches long? Remember, I have the whole conversation recorded and I will post it all if you like. It makes you look quite petty, vulgar and stupid. Like this:

Rosie Pose

Remember when Ainslie shouted that SHE DID NOT POST THAT VIDEO, and that we -- or somebody -- rifled it from her photobucket account?

Here is how to rifle a video from someone's photobucket account. I'm sure many of our lurkers have been wondering about that.

Quote from: poynt99 on May 14, 2012, 04:12:32 PM
Regarding the two bias conditions and the resulting circuit currents, I hope the attached drawing answers most if not all questions.

Neither case shown was with oscillation present.

.99

Your analyze is not in agreement with actual measurements. Both TK and me got 0,09 Ampere bias current.
You also have just added the bias current to the main current. This is not correct and measurement shows
that this is not correct. Without the bias current running (removing the Q2) the overall circuit current is 1,92 Amp.
With the Q2 installed then the bias current is 90mA. But the overall current did drop to 1,78 Amp. Did you you Spice
simulator to get those numbers?

GL.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 14, 2012, 11:17:09 PM
My 'satirical' references, which may I add exempts it from 'calumny and slander' are merely references to 'height and length'.  WHY is that VULGAR?
Rosie Pose

You are the one who said it was vulgar, Polly, so why don't YOU explain?

I'm glad you can tell the difference between satirical references and calumny and slander. Because when I call you an arrogant uneducated ignoramus, I am only expressing a very widely held OPINION... which I can support with many facts and statements in your own words.

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 14, 2012, 11:20:18 PM
You are the one who said it was vulgar, Polly, so why don't YOU explain?

I'm glad you can tell the difference between satirical references and calumny and slander. Because when I call you an arrogant uneducated ignoramus, I am only expressing a very widely held OPINION... which I can support with many facts and statements in your own words.

TK you are not only as wrong as ever and hopelessly OFF TOPIC but you're getting WAY too boring.  CONCENTRATE on Groundloops posts.  They - at LEAST - could teach you something. 

Rosie Pose

Quite apart from the general vulgarity of your rather 'dismal' invective - is that video - 'making out with a dog' boomp - boomp boomp.  That should have been censored - LONG back - IN ITS ENTIRETY.  And that's not even touching on your 'gross' vulgarity in 'name calling' that you seem to think is clever and simply parades your infantile emotional level of maturity.

Rosie Pose