TK, Poynt:

For the DSO mean power calculation, I think there are two types.  One is for the whole capture buffer, and the other is "cycle" based?

Is the cycle-based one dependent on some kind of software algorithm that tries to recognize a clearly periodic signal in the memory buffer?  I think Poynt mentioned that this function has its limitations.  I suppose even today there is only so much an algorithm like that can do.

If there was an option to move cursors manually to define the mean cycle that would be cool.

MileHigh

Guys,

Quote from: MileHigh on May 17, 2012, 11:11:01 PM
Rosemary:

So what in God's name are you saying?  Why are you making a fool of yourself by denigrating other people and their ideas when what you are saying is not true and 95% of the time you are not even qualified to say if their ideas have merit or not?

Why?  What's the real truth with you?

MileHigh

Guys,
The benefits to me personally and to our technology generally - are based on precisely the kind of dialogue that is offered in this thread.  It is a parody of science and of social commentary - both.  Those that actively partake here are bereft of the common decencies that could otherwise have made some valid contribution to the topic under discussion.  TK has chosen his 'brand name' Tar Baby - with reckless disrespect to vast numbers of people that have been socially abused - and politically disenfranchised.  And they are further - to this day - still disadvantaged by grave financial equalities that are exploited by our rather ruthless monopolists.  Geographically and numerically - these unequal distributions of opportunity and wealth - effect vast reaches of our populations.  The term Tar Baby is flaunted deliberately to insult all those who suffer under 2nd and 3rd world conditions.  And the proof of TK's racist leanings are evidenced in his assumptions that we, in South Africa, wear 'loin cloths' and that we are incapable of even manufacturing and producing reliable motor cars.  That is slander.  It's a level of slander that would outrage any fair minded citizen anywhere on our globe.  It shows a want of decency that would alienate all but that small minority who still propose racial superiority.  And this is then coupled with a flagrant disrespect to every single citizen in South Africa and probably - in Africa as a whole.  And these criminal propensities to slander and insult are evident in very nearly every single post in this thread where I, personally, am addressed in terms that are legally actionable and morally entirely reprehensible.  And where our hard work is degraded by its association within this context - it is further denigrated with the use of really bad science that they offer as an argument against it.  Nor is there any effort made to satirise that context.  The terms of abuse are unequivocal.  Naked in their intent.  And the intention is to destroy my good name and with it our hard work.

And that begs the question 'why'?  I have now sent a further 2 emails to Harti.  And I have attempted to phone him twice.  He does not answer my calls.  He does not answer my emails.  Which leaves me with no option but to ask my attorneys to insist on his co-operation within the context of his own contract and within the context of his own forum guidelines.  And we all know where that will end.  But what intrigues me most is this.  Harti clearly enjoys a certain amount of income from the advertising made available through this forum.  Which then also relies on a high 'hit rate'.  While TK's thread still enjoys a high percentage of 'hits' Harti's overall readership count is dropping.  Why is he allowing his forum to be 'trashed' by these less than savoury postings?  Why is he tolerating this level of calumny?  This level of abuse?  In the final analysis we're ONLY asking our experts to evaluate some anomalous readings.  What could be more modest?  It all speaks to a questionable agenda behind Harti's actual reach to find new energy sources.  Because that's PRECISELY what he's frustrating.  And may I add - it is a concern that has been voiced to me be many of our members.  But they speak most eloquently - when they simply 'disengage' from his forum.

This post of MileHigh's is a PERFECT example of their entire lack of defense in their declared objects to denigrate our work.  Rest assured.  We will - very publicly - show more than enough evidence of over unity to satisfy everyone everywhere.  But we collaborators will NEVER do it in the context of this thread.  And in the light of these my protests - it is highly doubtful that we will be able do it in the context of this forum. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

Rosemary:

What a joke.  You make a complete ass of yourself tonight for all to see - a spectacle.  Then you come back and make this posting.

The "Tar Baby" name has nothing to do with racial strife in South Africa, it's a wry comment about your propensity to get into ever increasing levels of conflict and the reference is a 19th century novel.

QuoteIn modern usage, "tar baby" refers to any "sticky situation" that is only aggravated by additional contact.

Then come your pleas.  You are just an old lady that has discovered an anomaly.

The problem is that in fact you haven't discovered an anomaly, and the dim bulb test will show this.

The other problem is that you are unable to admit to your behavioural problems tonight and accept responsibility for your actions and apologize.  Even though you know it, I know it, TK knows it, and the entire readership knows it.  It's just a few pages back, anybody can read it.

And the last point is that you may run away.  You can't face or accept the reality of the diligent work being done yet again to analyze your circuit and explain it.  You tried acting like a buffoon tonight and it backfired on you.  You might be back to your own blog will all comments disabled.

MileHigh

MileHigh - ON THE CONTRARY

Quote from: MileHigh on May 18, 2012, 12:40:59 AM
What a joke.  You make a complete ass of yourself tonight for all to see - a spectacle.  Then you come back and make this posting.

The "Tar Baby" name has nothing to do with racial strife in South Africa, it's a wry comment about your propensity to get into ever increasing levels of conflict and the reference is a 19th century novel.

Then come your pleas.  You are just an old lady that has discovered an anomaly.

The problem is that in fact you haven't discovered an anomaly, and the dim bulb test will show this.

The other problem is that you are unable to admit to your behavioural problems tonight and accept responsibility for your actions and apologize.  Even though you know it, I know it, TK knows it, and the entire readership knows it.  It's just a few pages back, anybody can read it.

And the last point is that you may run away.  You can't face or accept the reality of the diligent work being done yet again to analyze your circuit and explain it.  You tried acting like a buffoon tonight and it backfired on you.  You might be back to your own blog will all comments disabled.

The term 'tar baby' is in the context of every single post in this thread and every single reference to TK's videos include 'making out with a dog' including 'do you still wear loin cloths?' including ' remind me not to buy a car from South Africa' ... that's from the top of my head.

If I were to go deeper into those recesses it would include a slew of insults and accusations that I do NOT care to repeat and that still need to be redressed - moderated - edited - or deleted.  Take your pick.  They are against forum guidelines.  And I, unlike any of you, am NOT guilty of any acts of slander.

Rosie Posie

. won't take an amendment.  I'll post this again.