Quote from: poynt99 on May 19, 2012, 01:25:42 PM
GL,

I have simulated it, with the actual MOSFET in place. There was no significant change in any of the measurements.

In the simulation, the Q1 body diode is reverse-biased to about -22V, so other than a very small leakage current, there is almost no current through Q1. Your Q1 should also be reverse-biased, i.e. V_S-D should be negative 22V or so.

ETA: The actual measured current through Q1 is about 5uA.

.99

I did measure 0,36 Watt difference in the bias energy usage with the non oscillating MOSFET pulled or not.
So you simulation is not showing what is happening in my circuit. I trust my measurement to be correct.

GL.

Sean Inglis - your contributions to this discussion are in, in my opinion, in the same league as FTC's and picowatts. I am not interested in them.  And I do NOT want to know your identity.  I want to know TK's. 

Quote from: mrsean2k on May 19, 2012, 01:33:30 PM
Rosemary


So far I've limited my comments to following TKs calculations and agreeing with his methods from a position of ignorance, but cross referencing to standard texts and definitions, discussing analysis of terms with GL in what I thought was a polite, mutually respectful and enlightening way, and taking the trouble to correct what seems to be a common source of confusion for you WRT employing the terms energy and power, by directly approaching the source you've been relying on. The latter as much through feeling embarrassed for you than anything else.


But your laundry list of complaints shows you to be something of a fantasist and / or self deluded.


My full name is Sean Inglis, my twitter handle is, no surprises, @mrsean2k, and if your "legal" representatives want to contact me - on the offchance they're total idiots - they can use idiots(at)seani(dot)justemail(dot)net

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 19, 2012, 01:37:19 PM
And THIS evolvingape IS AN UNADULTERATED EXAMPLE OF FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION.  Correctly this should be accompanied by a disclosure of your name.  Else you too are simply a coward - abusing forum guidelines with the certainty that you will NEVER be accountable for this level of slander.  Which puts you in the same league as TK and his cohorts - Groundloop and Poynty excepted.

Rosie Pose

Quote:

I had no idea that your name was Robert Mason.  I'm impressed that you disclose this.  Thank you.  And I apologise if I should have known this. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

Goldfish memory dumbass ?

Quote from: Groundloop on May 19, 2012, 01:46:00 PM
.99

I did measure 0,36 Watt difference in the bias energy usage with the non oscillating MOSFET pulled or not.
So you simulation is not showing what is happening in my circuit. I trust my measurement to be correct.

GL.

Take your voltage meter (or scope) and measure across the D-S on each MOSFET. If the positive probe is on the Drain, the two voltages should be positive, and around 22V.

What is your circuit current?

THANK YOU evolvingape.  I take it then that you are more than willing to allow HARTI to disclose your address?  Does he have this?  Or are you going to make that available as well?  We still need that in order to address our complaint appropriately.

Quote from: evolvingape on May 19, 2012, 01:47:21 PM
Quote:

I had no idea that your name was Robert Mason.  I'm impressed that you disclose this.  Thank you.  And I apologise if I should have known this. 

Regards,
Rosemary

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

Goldfish memory dumbass ?