Quote from: TinselKoala on May 22, 2012, 06:28:40 PM
If you think that was permission you are mistaken. But I clearly cannot control your threats, your lies and broken promises, or other actions. But... we'll just have to see if there are any consequences of your actions.

so that's a no then on the proof... imagine that!
it was, and no i wasn't. clearly you cannot control any of my actions, just as i cannot control a single one of your assumptions, speculations and asinine conjectures. or... we'll just have to see if there are any consequences of your actions... 

So, I note that YOUR image and search supports MY POINT exactly. Her use of the term is idiosyncratic and I nor YOU have ever seen it used that way before, have you, WILBY.

But MY images show her using it that way at least 4 times, and I have other examples too.

I also "assume" that, you, master logician, have no objections to the way Ainslie calculates or the way she cricitises MY power calculations. Therefore.... well.... DO THE MATH, troll.

And if you think I have given you permission to disclose anything you think you might know about me, you are wrong. I have not given you that permission. However if you choose to act otherwise, I will feel correspondingly unrestrained.

Harti,

It might be wise to place a call or contact the lawyer by an advertised email (one different from whence received) to verify the letter actually originated from them.

PW

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 22, 2012, 06:41:53 PM
So, I note that YOUR image and search supports MY POINT exactly. Her use of the term is idiosyncratic and I nor YOU have ever seen it used that way before, have you, WILBY.

no, it doesn't. it was posted to demonstrate that you are engaging in the logical fallacy known as 'biased sample'. you are misusing the type of reasoning known variously as inductive generalization, generalization, and statistical generalization, troll. but... it went right over your head. imagine that!
so to recap... since tinselkoala/alsetalokin doesn't think the email was written in form that texas lawyers write legalese, rosemary is the culprit... because heaven forbid that anyone else who is from south africa (like the lawyer hired to send the email...) would use the same 'language' as rose (who is from south africa)... such brilliant assumptions, speculation and conjecture... you have my infinite admiration. as an aside, have you seen every instantiation of the word 'refers'? have you TROLL? no? i thought so.  again, tu stultus es!

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 22, 2012, 06:41:53 PM
But MY images show her using it that way at least 4 times, and I have other examples too.

oh my!  your cherry picked images to support your assumptions, speculations and conjectures show nothing but your assumptions, speculations and conjectures. once again... do you have any proof? you do know what 'proof' means right?

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 22, 2012, 06:41:53 PM
I also "assume" that, you, master logician, have no objections to the way Ainslie calculates or the way she cricitises MY power calculations. Therefore.... well.... DO THE MATH, troll.

irrelevant to what we are discussing... another of your red herrings, troll.

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 22, 2012, 06:41:53 PM
And if you think I have given you permission to disclose anything you think you might know about me, you are wrong. I have not given you that permission. However if you choose to act otherwise, I will feel correspondingly unrestrained.

oh my!  threats of a good time... i'm so effing scared.

A kangaroo court in a culvert.  lol  It's going to be held in Latin.

Inherit the Zipons - The Scopes Electro-Monkey trial.