And guys - I've been advised to stop all further posts here.  I need to make a concluding post.  We've got a new forum and another one that's well subscribed.  We'll be posting links everywhere I hope. 

We've also got a marathon ahead of us.  We have to show our battery draw down tests.  In multiple contexts.  And that's likely to take some time for each test to run.  It's unlikely to be 'gripping' stuff except that it'll show 'out performance' of our batteries against their watt hour ratings by a HUGE and incontestable factor.  Then too we have a slew of smaller tests needed to disabuse you of the 'conjectures' that our little TK has applied in this rather disgusting thread of his.  However long it takes - however boring will be those tests - they'll point to the dramatic PROOF that our unity barriers are NOT APPLICABLE to electric energy.  And with a small detour in those tests we'll explain our 'thinking' related to this. 

Then.  We'll most CERTAINLY be applying for those prizes from Poynty, Prof Jones and Stefan Hartman.  They ask for PROOF of over unity.  We're going to give that in SPADES.  That it's NOT strictly over unity - but simply a potential that's been overlooked in the energy of mass - then that's tough.  Their own definitions PRECLUDE results that exceed Kirchhoff's unity requirements.  And having obtained those prizes we'll then donate it to those experimentalists on this forum that YOU nominate as requiring this money for measuring instruments.  And I'm reasonably certain that LeCroy agents will consider HEAVILY DISCOUNTED prices should their own BRILLIANT equipment be required.

Give me another week and I'll point you to the forum.  Give me another 3 weeks - and we'll be officially launched.  And hold onto your seats.  The ride may be smoother than thus far - but its results will still BLOW YOU AWAY.

Kindest and best regards to all of you who still work for energy efficiencies in defiance of our TROLLS
Rosie
ADDED

And lest picowatt continue to try and diminish our claim - we'll prove an out performance against the battery watt hour ratings that CANNOT be argued as low current nor any other excuse that they'll use to trivialise this.

"out performance" of our batteries against their watt hour ratings...

A somewhat more conservative claim than COP=Infinity

ADDED:  And a much more difficult to prove claim at best...

So I assume that will be with respect to a battery's watt hour rating with the same load profile applied (i.e., same current, pulse rate, etc).

A battery's amp hour rating is quite variable, and varies dependent upon the applied load profile.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 24, 2012, 03:15:35 AM
Not actually.  I KNOW you're little because I've seen your torso height relative to a 'table' - your finger length relative to a MOSFET - your hand size relative to your apparatus - and your foot size relative to your mouth.  I'm something of an artist and a dilettante.  Such relationships intrigue me.  I KNOW you live very near to Pickle - because you share the same equipment.  And you're both the same size.  72 pickles per swagger - and that's TINY.      At a fair guess I'd say you're at least 2 square feet short of 60 pickles.  Conservatively speaking.  And that little sketch I did of you in that victory jig - was only flawed by it's gross understatement.

Rosie Pose

You are an idiot and a liar. All of that would still be kind of OK, but the most damning thing is this: you are totally and utterly and laughably wrong. Your obsession with my pickle is particularly laughable, but understandable, considering that you HAVE NO OTHER ARGUMENT at all. But you should know this, Ainslie: you are far off the mark with your attempts at satire. All you are doing is illustrating what a silly old fool you are by your comments about "pickles" and all the rest. And you are even wrong about all of that !! You KNOW things that nobody else knows.... like that I live near "pickle" and use the same equipment? What is that supposed to mean? I'll tell you: you KNOW only what your delusions and fantasies tell you, and you care nothing for facts.

And in the English most of us speak, you idiot blowhard, "IT'S" is the contraction of IT IS, and "ITS" is the possessive meaning "belonging to it". This is another mistake in your grammar that you are continually making and it's particularly funny to see you making it when criticising other people for their English usage. Your post refers. And my post laughs at your bogus lawyer letter.


Not only that, your entire history of posts in this thread and the others that I have archived in my database show that you are a mean-sprited, spiteful and nasty person, uncooperative , arrogant and ignorant of your topic. It doesn't matter in the least how short of how ugly I might be, because your ideas are polluted by your ignorance and you refuse to understand how or why....therefore you will ALWAYS be wrong.

You cannot engage on a factual and reasonable level because your position is unsupportable and THAT is why there is NOBODY supporting you. The closest you have to a supporter here is Wilby your pet troll, a wind-breaking blowhard who can only pick at nits, when there is a huge parasite sucking everybody's blood: you, Ainslie, are that bloodsucking parasite. And even he knows that your own data show that you are wrong.

And you will not be doing any real tests and everyone reading here knows it.


Bye bye Ainslie, you have no credibilty left. I have it all documented in a few big files that contain YOUR OWN WORDS and data, together in one place where it can be examined critically by anyone who cares to, without your blowhard obfuscation and insulting nonsense "explanations". And wherever and whenever I encounter any mention of you on the internet, I will inform the discussants of the existence of this database and where to find it.... and they can do with it what they will and make their own conclusions about just who and what you are, Rosemary Ainslie.

And I will welcome additions to this database that I might not have in there yet. So if anyone reading here knows of any Ainslie data that should be included, like accounts from her former collaborators, or additional hard data in the form of scopeshots or spreadsheets from the NERDs, or other instances where she plainly lies or misrepresents facts,  please send the data to me and I will zip it up with the rest of the packages.... so that anyone who needs the FACTS of the Ainslie matter.... like all those imaginary lawyers.... or even some real ones with an interest in finding out the TRUTH about Ainslie.... can find it easily. It is all there for them, in black and white, in Ainslie's own words and conversations and pretty pastel colored scopeshots.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 24, 2012, 03:46:13 AM
And guys - I've been advised to stop all further posts here.  I need to make a concluding post.  We've got a new forum and another one that's well subscribed.  We'll be posting links everywhere I hope. 

We've also got a marathon ahead of us.  We have to show our battery draw down tests.  In multiple contexts.  And that's likely to take some time for each test to run.  It's unlikely to be 'gripping' stuff except that it'll show 'out performance' of our batteries against their watt hour ratings by a HUGE and incontestable factor.  Then too we have a slew of smaller tests needed to disabuse you of the 'conjectures' that our little TK has applied in this rather disgusting thread of his.  However long it takes - however boring will be those tests - they'll point to the dramatic PROOF that our unity barriers are NOT APPLICABLE to electric energy.  And with a small detour in those tests we'll explain our 'thinking' related to this. 

Then.  We'll most CERTAINLY be applying for those prizes from Poynty, Prof Jones and Stefan Hartman.  They ask for PROOF of over unity.  We're going to give that in SPADES.  That it's NOT strictly over unity - but simply a potential that's been overlooked in the energy of mass - then that's tough.  Their own definitions PRECLUDE results that exceed Kirchhoff's unity requirements.  And having obtained those prizes we'll then donate it to those experimentalists on this forum that YOU nominate as requiring this money for measuring instruments.  And I'm reasonably certain that LeCroy agents will consider HEAVILY DISCOUNTED prices should their own BRILLIANT equipment be required.

Give me another week and I'll point you to the forum.  Give me another 3 weeks - and we'll be officially launched.  And hold onto your seats.  The ride may be smoother than thus far - but its results will still BLOW YOU AWAY.

Kindest and best regards to all of you who still work for energy efficiencies in defiance of our TROLLS
Rosie
ADDED

And lest picowatt continue to try and diminish our claim - we'll prove an out performance against the battery watt hour ratings that CANNOT be argued as low current nor any other excuse that they'll use to trivialise this.

Preserved in all its glorious ridiculousness for posterity. And of course it is added to the database: another claim, another promise, another set of lies from Ainslie, and the continuing announcement of the pursuit of monetary prizes based on false claims and bad data.