Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

Started by mrwayne, April 10, 2011, 04:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 184 Guests are viewing this topic.

mondrasek

Quote from: neptune on June 22, 2012, 01:27:42 PM
Not 100% certain, but I think these spacers are shown in the patent.

Definitely shown.  But described in legalease as "may or may not" be used in a given embodiment of said device. 

Man that is painful to try and type...  Need to stop reading legalease.

M.

neptune

They are certainly shown in the "how it works" diagrams posted by mrwayne of the ZED. That tells me that it would work with them. Will it work without them ? Dont know.

LarryC

Quote from: mondrasek on June 22, 2012, 12:57:42 PM

Okay.  Please note that I levitated the Pod so that the gap between it's top surface and the next Riser was the same gap (.31) as all the other gaps.  Just FYI.

M.
Yes, that may be it, it does look like Fig 16, 17 and 18. Fig 15 should be the same, not sure, because the latest picture from Travis with 8 systems is like 15.

@Travis,
Please clarify this issue?

Regards, Larry

Cisco

"But, It's not hanging right at the bottom, should look like Fig 14. I'll check my specifications.

Regards, Larry"

[/size]
Fig. 14 does hang different at the bottom. It also shows spacers and vents to be used during assembly. But there is a minor mistake where the vents are shown. According to the (argh!) patent description of assembly at [0095] and [0096], Vent 162 should be located not on the pod--the pod needs no vent--but instead on the inner riser where vent 188 is shown; and vent 188 should be shown at the top of the outer riser. They are depicted correctly in Fig. 15.[/size]

LarryC

Quote from: LarryC on June 22, 2012, 01:49:42 PM
Yes, that may be it, it does look like Fig 16, 17 and 18. Fig 15 should be the same, not sure, because the latest picture from Travis with 8 systems is like 15.

@Travis,
Please clarify this issue?
Might have the logic. At rest, with low or no water, each Riser sits on a retainer wall, enough that would allows them to separate from the spacers. So each retainer wall from inner to outer is higher by spacer plus separation gap. Thus, when lifted and the separation gap is lost, the longer Riser walls would be the outer most. So it seems 14, 15 and the 'One Zed through complete cycle' is more likely.

Regards, Larry