Howdy everyone,

All one has to do is do some research on the credibility of Rosemary and her "PROOF" of claims on the magical mosfet circuits, here is where to look for "Rosemary" whom uses multiple screen names to avoid internet "SEARCHES".

witsend     ( aka Rosemary Ainslie)

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/   ( banned membership )
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/                ( banned membership )

aetherevarising     ( aka Rosemary Ainslie )

http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising
http://www.youtube.com/user/aetherevarising
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php                 ( quit forum membership )
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/index.php    ( banned membership )

dooziedont    ( aka Rosemary Ainslie )

http://www.youtube.com/user/dooziedont        ( fraudulent video )

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.energeticforum.com/59119-post205.html    (link)

Quote
I was never given the results of any of the tests conducted by those accreditors. It was not from want of trying. But I was given their permission to use their names as accreditors in the Quantum article. The reason we simply used that precise experiment for the paper submitted to the IET was to reference their names. I do have the report for BP because we had to conduct those experiments on battey duration. But the context of that report is just on the effect as it relates to battery delivery - and it has got to be the single most boring exercise in all of history. It's object impeccable - but the testing exhausting.

I think the truth is that these companies allocate a certain amount of funding to research. And having found their answers they do not make it public. Presumbaly having paid for their own lab time they rightly regard the results as being their property - or their company's property. We did try and get the results - but failed - miserably.

http://www.energeticforum.com/60943-post774.html     (link)

Quote
And could it also be because, notwithstanding the modesty of the effect - it is also measurable in terms of classical analysis? And could it be because - not only is the gain claimed - these effects have been thoroughly analysed and accredited by experts in the art. Let me name it's most authoritative accreditor. ABB Research in North Carolina.

Now, let me continue with that list of accreditors. It also includes, Sasol (SA) Spescom (SA) BP (SA) and others. They are all either public companies or they are individuals associated with public companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rosemary Ainslie's QUOTE -
They are all either public companies or they are individuals associated with public companies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As everyone can see on the "PROOF" of the accreditors on the COP>17 magical mosfet device .... there is NONE !!! Just like the COP>INFINITY magical mosfet device. 

As everyone can also see is the "LOOSE" connection with a COMPANY and a "INDIVIDUAL" that worked or possibly had worked for a company is excepted by Rosemary as "PROOF" of a accreditor . 


You all reading this will never see anything that can or will be excepted as proof of said claim of operation of any magical mosfet circuit created by Rosemary. All the original tested devices don't exist anymore as they were destroyed to protect the "THESIS" and any claim of shipment or testing of the new COP>INFINITY device hasn't and will never happen. The magical Rosemary mosfet devices have all floated away in the foul South African breezes of dishonesty and disceptation. 


FuzzyTomCat

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on June 22, 2012, 04:55:39 PM
...breezes of dishonesty and disceptation.


FuzzyTomCat

I collect malapropisms.  This one's choice.  Thanks Fuzzy.

Rosie Pose

How about starting a collection of FACTS instead?

FACT:  Q2 is turned on when a negative voltage is applied to its source by the FG. 

FACT:  When Q2 is turned on via the negative voltage applied to its source, the subsequent bias current flows thru the FG. 

FACT:  During the oscillation phase, AC current current flows thru both the FG and thru Coss/Ciss.

FACT:  In the first paper's FIG3 and FIG7, Q1 is not functioning or is not connected as per the schematic as is apparent from the indicated gate drive voltage and absence of current flow thru the CSR

FACT:  Inductive and capacitive reactance is REAL.  A wire is not always just a wire...

A questionative kitty
Of a rather fuzzy kind
Had the word Discepitation
Plugged into his mind.

The resulting rambillations
He discursabilly shared
Were cognitativexually
and disturbingly impaired.

rosie pose

Quote from: Rosemary
A questionative kitty
Of a rather fuzzy kind
Had the word Discepitation
Plugged into his mind.

The resulting rambillations
He discursabilly shared
Were cognitativexually
and disturbingly impaired.

rosie pose

Brilliant!!  Ingenious!!

You're doing quite well Rosie in holding your own against
the onslaught.

Very ladylike too!  (As always.)