Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 23, 2012, 05:36:37 AM
Let me say this again, little TK

You mean, let you bloviate and try ONCE AGAIN to cover up the issues: You are lying about boiling water, you are lying with your battery capacity calculations, you are refusing to deal with the issues of your Figure 3 and Figure 7, you are refusing to deal with the issue of the Function Generator demonstration which refutes your stupid claims, and et cetera.

Quote
You are obsessively, disproportionately and inappropriately interested in EVERYTHING to do with our technology and with me.

You lie again. I don't care one whit about you or your silly kludge which is not technology but a comedy of error. I do care that you are continuing to lie your way across the internet, and I care that you continue to malign and slander me without the slightest ACTUAL refutation or outside reference to support your silly claims.

QuoteIt is WAY beyond reason.  I am an old woman who has nursed an insight into the transfer of energy that I've been at some pains to recommend be more thoroughly researched by those who understand these things.

You have no insight, only delusions.

QuoteA harmless interest - with MUCH potential.

No, Ainslie, you are doing incredible harm.

QuoteYou've assumed the right to comment beyond your expertise and with the sole purpose of deflecting the interest that it deserves.

I am not beyond my expertise at all, you ignorant bloviating liar. There is NOT ONE THING in my work that you can refute or challenge with facts or demonstrations of your own. IN FACT, it is you who are clearly over your old grey head because you don't even understand the basics of electronics and cannot even draw a circuit diagram, much less analyze one.

QuoteYou've been effective in silencing me on this - on these forums.  But right now I'm no longer 'in reach'.  It's hit the wider public and you will no longer be able to monopolise commentary.  Quite apart from which - your contributions, thus far, have been SO inappropriate - that you've effectively put yourself outside any kind of respectable 'REFERENCE'.  Which makes any past and future efforts of yours both redundant and irrelevant.

You wish that were true. On the contrary, Ainslie, I have a lot of FACTS that are available to anyone who is honestly interested in knowing your full story.... and it's a "doozy" for sure.

Quote
Those sad efforts of yours to imply lunacy - or gross stupidity?  All that?  It no longer holds water. 

You are laughable. I've refuted you over and over, soundly, and all my work stands solidly. You cannot refute a single bit of it with facts, checkable references or demonstrations of your own. I've shown over and over that you are ignorant of your subject and you only continue to confirm the truth of that. And your paranoid delusions and mistaken beliefs about people, their identities and employment illustrate your lunacy with stunning clarity.

QuotePeople aren't interested in my character.  Or anything about me.  Only you are.  Don't you get it yet?  They're only interested in the potential in that technology. 

Many people realize by now that you are a liar and that your reports cannot be trusted. If I have had some role in causing this awareness, I am gratified. Your disgusting character is evident in every "Best regards" and "Little TK" that you write, you hypocritical scrawny parrot.

QuoteAnd you have, UNFORTUNATELY for you, FORTUNATELY for me, been highly instrumental in drawing their attention to our work - albeit unintended.

I laugh at you. First you denigrate my work then you praise it. I've done your homework for you, gone farther than you ever have done, illustrated the kinds of tests that are ACTUALLY required to examine your claims, and I've produced better evidence than you ever have done of your own claims.... and between .99 and me, we've shown that your BEST EVIDENCE is a result of your bad measurements and lousy experimental practice. I can't even call it "technique".

QuoteThe experts are easily able to see through your SPIN - and your POOR ARGUMENT - and your DREADFUL experimental aptitudes.

You are indeed an idiot. You cannot refute a single experiment of mine nor can you provide a single substantive criticism. You know nothing of the Scientific Method and your draft manuscripts wouldn't pass muster at an eighth grade science fair. I have had my experimental work published in MAJOR peer reviewed journals.... you have been rejected out of hand every time you've submitted any of your lousy, error ridden and uncouth "work". You cannot point to a single instance of "dreadful experimental aptitudes" in my work, or show anything of your own that's better or even close to what I have done in this thread. In addition... there are those University degrees which I have EARNED, and which say clearly right on them that I am a scientist, and I've had my experiments published in REAL journals. So I simply laugh at your "DREADFUL" comments, because I know that you don't have a clue about real science or the process of real peer reviewed publication.

QuoteAnd they want to look at the TECHNOLOGY.  ONLY.  My involvement in this is ENTIRELY immaterial.

THERE IS NO TECHNOLOGY, you silly old woman. You've got a handful of mosfets on a white pegboard, and some scope traces that you are manifestly and demonstrably misinterpreting. If you weren't involved, you know that your whole story would disappear, as it should do.

QuoteIf I've lied about any presentations at all - they'll pick it up.  Rest easy on this.  They're considerably more intelligent than you or I.  They're certainly better qualified.  And MOST essentially - they're impartial.  Which is entirely lacking in your BEST efforts. 

You have indeed lied, I have proven it many times and can do so again and again. The boiling water, for one thing. The 5.9 megajoule claim which has vanished for some reason... but I have it still. The incredibly ignorant claims based on your stupid math errors which you have not retracted: if your laboratory ignores all of these lies of yours ... well, we'll see, or will we? And you are right, I'm not impartial: I've done the work required to see that you are full of lies and bogus claims and that your reports are inaccurate, and I'm reporting what I have found, and I'm making it so that ANYONE can repeat what I've found without your obscuring and nonsensical "thesis" and your misrepresentations of facts. ANYONE can repeat what I've done and see for themselves about your secret "open source" little "technology".

Quote
You've done no-one any damage at all - other than yourselves.  I've warned you about this.  Repeatedly.  For God's sake.  How do you justify these obsessive - RIDICULOUS - hysterical posts of yours?

Ainslie, your posts are ridiculous and hysterical. Also long, bloviating, and with the OBVIOUS PURPOSE of covering up issues... .like your NON BOILING WATER and your FUNCTION GENERATOR FAUX PAS...... which you still ignore and don't understand. Damage? I have blown your little boat out of the water, Ainslie.

QuoteThere's a small readership of these forums that comprise those who are 'hunting' for new technologies.  And it was INEVITABLE that once we were published they'd come forward with their proposals to test this.  You seem to have forgotten this.  Or you were that reckless you assumed we'd never get published. 

You have not "gotten published". Rossi's JNP is not a Journal! It's a vanity blog that he started to post his own non-publishable work!  You are a joke, your "papers" are jokes, and Rossi's JNP is a laughable joke. And just as always, anyone who actually DOES test your kludge will discover what EVERYBODY that has done so already has discovered: that you are a liar and ignorant about your subject matter. What, do you think that SUDDENLY now, after all these years, the Universe is going to allow some secret laboratory to discover your zipons, when NOBODY ELSE has been able to in all these years? You are pathetic.

Quote

It's out there now.  And it has nothing further to do with me.  We've open sourced EVERYTHING. 

You liar. OPEN SOURCE means no secrets, no misrepresentations, cooperation with your questioners, and a lot of other stuff that you aren't doing. WHAT is the name and location of this mystery laboratory? You won't say, and that makes your OPEN SOURCE claim another LIE, one of many that you constantly are making.

QuoteAnd we're only anxious that this technology get progressed.  Correctly I don't even need to be told how anyone progresses this.  But I hope that the likes of Poynty and Groundloop will engage with this.  Eventually.  And nor can be we accused of inventing anything.  We're simply using well known CEMF to improve energy efficiency.  And that this is required is certainly explained in our model - but has NOTHING to do with a discovery.  That belongs to our science greats.  My mission, where I deserve a prize - is that I didn't fold - when I brought this evidence to the table.  Notwithstanding your own and others rather neurotic and entirely excessive best efforts. 

Yak yak yak. You've got no tech, no model, and you are full of yourself. You deserve a prize all right-- as the most damaging hoaxer ever to sully these forums.

Quote

LOL.  I'm enjoying a rare sense of achievement.  It's good to know that reason eventually prevails.  And I'm now just waiting to see who is going to progress this that they can get the public attention it deserves.  It's round about now that I'll be able to close the chapter on my contributions to this.  And then I can concentrate on those things that I enjoy - such as writing and painting and even theoretical physics.  But without all that ATTENTION that you keep throwing my way.

Rosie Pose

You've achieved nothing but more delays. Nobody is stopping you from concentrating on the things you enjoy... but we know what those really are: trolling, insulting, and avoiding issues. You want to avoid attention.... you've had plenty of opportunity to WITHDRAW your false claims and STOP LYING. Then you'll fade back into the veldt where you belong, back in your guesthouse with your walled garden.

Quote from: SeaMonkey on June 23, 2012, 03:09:31 AM
Aye, in the minds of some few that may indeed be the case.

But she ain't laid down and hollered "Uncle!" yet.

Her responses are witty;  her grammar is correct;
her spellings are error free;  her tone is civil and
well bred;  and her sense of humor is intact.

As always, time will tell...  The best "man" will win
again.  Isn't it odd that the Woman is more of a "man"
than those who pursue her?

QuoteIt's object impeccable - but the testing exhausting.

QuotePresumbaly

QuoteLet me name it's most authoritative accreditor.

QuoteI'm doing by best

JUST ON ONE PAGE ALONE !!

Sea Monkey, are you for real?

Mr Sean - a lurking nasty
Lived in the margins of a thread
Had no brains to use to think with
Nothing moved inside his head.

When he saw that Rosie Ainslie
Could make most things electrify
Said 'If she can do so much with nothing
What the hell, then so can I'.

Whereupon he squealed in anguish
And the space between his ears did smoke
Said 'Oh dear me and goodness gracious,
I'm sorry now I ever spoke.

As I see that thinking isn't easy
God knows I've never tried before
I've done it now. I was so tempted
But it makes my head feel very sore'.

Whereupon he lapsed to mumbling
And that lively moment in his head
Drifted through that spacious vacuum
Then settled down and went to bed.

And those passers by who sadly heard him
Shook their heads and looked away
For they knew that thoughts that stupid
Should really not see light of day.

Rosie Pose

I've preserved this vile, despicable insulting screed for posterity, to illustrate YET AGAIN what an insipid, twisted sick mind you have, Ainslie, to insult your betters in this filthy manner. Your ignorance and idiocy is unmatched. You cannot compete with the intelligence, erudition, experience and worldliness of the people who criticise you WITH FACTS AND FIGURES so you write your pitiful doggerel insults, like a ten-year-old child scribbling on a rival's school notebook. You are pathetic.

You can't even do the required arithmetic to support your contentions, and yet you have the arrogance to insult baselessly your critics who CAN. You are a piece of work, nothing like you anywhere, impervious to facts and truth. You've been proven wrong DOZENS of times, by everyone who has ever bothered to check into your claims. Go away now, pack up your toys and send them off to oblivion, nasty vile person you.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 23, 2012, 10:42:19 AM
Mr Sean - a lurking nasty
Lived in the margins of a thread
Had no brains to use to think with
Nothing moved inside his head.

When he saw that Rosie Ainslie
Could make most things electrify
Said 'If she can do so much with nothing
What the hell, then so can I'.

Whereupon he squealed in anguish
And the space between his ears did smoke
Said 'Oh dear me and goodness gracious,
I'm sorry now I ever spoke.

As I see that thinking isn't easy
God knows I've never tried before
I've done it now. I was so tempted
But it makes my head feel very sore'.

Whereupon he lapsed to mumbling
And that lively moment in his head
Drifted through that spacious vacuum
Then settled down and went to bed.

And those passers by who sadly heard him
Shook their heads and looked away
For they knew that thoughts that stupid
Should really not see light of day.

Rosie Pose

And I note YET AGAIN that Ainslie is refusing to deal with the Function Generator passing current issue.

EVERY TIME I have posted this video she starts spewing page after page of bloviation and insults, but she NEVER has dealt with the fact that ONCE AGAIN I trounce one of her insane inane arrogant claims with a simple demonstration that anyone can repeat for themselves.

YOU HAVE BEEN REFUTED ON A FUNDAMENTAL POINT OF OPERATION OF YOUR CIRCUIT AND INSTRUMENTS, yet again, Ainslie.

Ainslie claimed:

QuoteWhat you are trying to do is to get me to believe that a function generator is able to pass current from a battery supply source via its terminal to its probe. Since I KNOW that is is impossible I'm afraid I'm not receptive to you trying to teach me or anyone else.  So NO.  I spare me your 'lessons'. (sic)

And I replied with this video, completely disproving her idiotic and arrogant statement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuBWVmRmUtc

YOU ARE WRONG, AINSLIE.