Quote from: picowatt on June 23, 2012, 10:42:30 PM
Back that answer up, explain it to us all...

And why exactly, should I bother?  Because you demand to know?  I don't think I owe you anything - least of all an explanation.  I would expect professionalism before I engage with anyone at all.  And you - like our little TK - have NONE.

Rosie Pose

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 23, 2012, 10:33:50 PM
You ask for evidence of inconsistency?  Little TK?  HERE IT IS.... 

You state that you've 'taught' - in the past tense - then you ALLEGE that you ARE considered 'an excellent teacher' - present tense - by your 'students' and by your 'supervisors'

Are your students STILL your students?  Are your supervisors STILL your supervisors?  Or did you give up teaching .... yesterday?  Did they boot you out mid term and mid month because you lacked professionalism?  Or because you simply didn't turn up for work being as busy as you are on this thread?  God knows it's a full time occupation.  Or is your employer 'The Boss' or even 'Sean'.  Who are you protecting?  Do those two thread lurkers pay you excessive amounts of money to damage my reputation?  Or are you simply trying to show your students - by default - how a professional should NOT behave?  Or are you're paid nothing for all this work that you apply to this propaganda and spin.  You do it for love?  Full time?  Because you enjoy indulging in malice and slander?  Do you have a private income that you can afford to do this full time? 

And FINALLY.  Do you really think that all this excess points to any residual balance in your own evidently and utterly imbalanced psyche?

Rosie Pose

You were an idiot in 2009 when I worked on your other crazy circuit. That makes you still an idiot today. And yes, Ainslie, I still have students. something you cannot grasp at all, lacking respect for teachers as you do.
Your lying insinuations about why I'm doing something else now aren't even worthy of notice.

And I thought I was supposed to be "well paid". At least that is another of your crazy claims.

I want to know what you mean in this quote where you say I manage to " INSERT a wire that simply was not there". Are you lying about me again, talking about when I exposed Mylow's fraudulent fishingline driven motor? Just what are you alleging here, the lawyers need to know specific details of your claims. This is not the first time you've made a similar idiotic assertion.

QuoteI should add this.  I am entirely satisfied that Harvey Gramm and Tinsel Koala? among others are all paid to deflect from this 'free energy' technology.  They are trained in psychology - NOT SCIENCE - and their mandate is to use any means possible to detract from either the work, the character - or BOTH - to continually frustrate this reach for energy abundance.  They are WELL PAID.  And they are VERY EFFECTIVE.  The also have liberal access to laboratories.  And TK was able to deflect from the work of ?? - can't remember the name as it happened before my advent to the forums - (it could be Mylow - somesuch?) where he was able to INSERT a wire that simply was not there.  I'll get back here when I've found out the man's name.  They are DANGEROUS.  And this is the real psyops program that is happening under our noses.  I am NOT paranoid. And frankly I'd prefer it if this were not the case.  We can all get comfort from the fact that Rossi is well able to deal with their nonsense.  The man's a genius.  And he's had his own bellyful of exposure to their agendas.

5.9 megaJoules, Ainslie. Water that wasn't boiling but you said it was. Figure 3.

I am not the issue, and every time you change the subject to ME, I will bring it back to YOU and I will re-list some of your continuing lies. So if that's what you want.... you really are sick.

Quote from: picowatt on June 23, 2012, 10:30:19 PM
TK,

Be aware that I believe that her reference to a single MOSFET was with regard to merely making the oscillations as in the .99/TK/Altoid circuit.  (As in hoping .99 would post the schematic "over there")

However, yes, it should be possible to make either circuit, with varyng degrees of complexity, turn the oscillating MOSFET(s) fully on for a period of time. 

PW

Yes, I am aware of that. I'm also aware that it's not possible to get the full high heat performance with only oscillations, and Ainslie has also made statements that indicate that she's aware of this too. Don't make me dig them up right now, please; but they are preserved in the RAPosts.zip files that are in the download section of this forum.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 23, 2012, 10:48:24 PM
And why exactly, should I bother?  Because you demand to know?  I don't think I owe you anything - least of all an explanation.  I would expect professionalism before I engage with anyone at all.  And you - like our little TK - have NONE.

Rosie Pose

GO AWAY then, Little Miss Mosfet, if all you are going to do is insult people. YOU ARE NOT HELPFUL, and you cannot even defend yourself with facts or demonstrations, which makes you completely useless.

And it's like a clock work toy. Every time I post that Function Generator video.... every time. Wind it up, set it down, and she bloviates, and bloviates, and bloviates, until that video is buried under piles and piles of more choice piles of Ainslie's insults and lies. Never once dealing with the FACT that the video destroys one of her fundamental claims utterly and conclusively, she tries to cover it up with irrelevancies, insults, innuendoes, and ignorant insinuations.