Dear Sean

Quote from: picowatt on June 26, 2012, 10:05:22 AM
Sean,


(She also wrote a new poem for you "over there". )

PW

My own is a standard 2 G byte number - and nowhere near filled.  But I may only send this info to registered laboratories or to public companies who are looking to research this.  Any preclusion related to emails is simply because you're associated with sundry Hate Blogs that are being investigated. 

Meanwhile - just on an entirely extraneous matter - and to prove that there's no excessive animosity related to this - may I publish your own doggerel on my forum?

Regards,
Rosemary

edited
I added the address lest picowatt assume I'm answering him.  God forbid.

R

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 26, 2012, 10:29:54 AM
My own is a standard 2 G byte number - and nowhere near filled.  But I may only send this info to registered laboratories or to public companies who are looking to research this.  Any preclusion related to emails is simply because you're associated with sundry Hate Blogs that are being investigated. 

Meanwhile - just on an entirely extraneous matter - and to prove that there's no excessive animosity related to this - may I publish your own doggerel on my forum?

Regards,
Rosemary

Who are you "talking" to?

Quote from: picowatt on June 26, 2012, 10:32:34 AM
Who are you "talking" to?

Fair question.  I edited my post.

R

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 26, 2012, 10:29:54 AM
My own is a standard 2 G byte number - and nowhere near filled.  But I may only send this info to registered laboratories or to public companies who are looking to research this.  Any preclusion related to emails is simply because you're associated with sundry Hate Blogs that are being investigated. 

Meanwhile - just on an entirely extraneous matter - and to prove that there's no excessive animosity related to this - may I publish your own doggerel on my forum?

Regards,
Rosemary

Just to be clear then, there *are* restrictions on who sees the data? That's a different claim to the one you make up-thread.




The only restriction I prefer (but would probably make no effort to enforce or complain about) is that if someone choses to attribute a quote to me, it's accurate.  Other than that I'm indifferent.

Quote from: mrsean2k on June 26, 2012, 10:39:54 AM
Just to be clear then, there *are* restrictions on who sees the data? That's a different claim to the one you make up-thread.

Indeed.  I was out of line.  Apparently there are all kinds of dangers that can result from misrepresentations.  Therefore I can't send anything without some kind of 'agreement' associated with this.

Quote from: mrsean2k on June 26, 2012, 10:39:54 AMThe only restriction I prefer (but would probably make no effort to enforce or complain about) is that if someone choses to attribute a quote to me, it's accurate.  Other than that I'm indifferent.

I'll take that as a 'yes'.  Thanks. 

Regards,
Rosemary