Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 28, 2012, 01:10:46 AM
Actually Magsy I had a shrewd idea what you were intending to convey.  LOL.

I am not intending to 'win' anything at all.  This is NOT a competition.  LOL 

Rosie Pose

I can see that. There is nothing left to contend. Its all over.

Mags

lol.  Magsy you sound like MileHigh.  'Everything's over'. 

Take heart.  Indeed everything is just beginning.  Thankfully not through the rather absurd efforts of our members who contribute so dilligently to this thread.  Commentary hereafter will be much BROADER and infinitely more dependable - than the sad efforts of these pretenders to the 'right to comment'.  Then we'll get some science back onto this subject.  And as ever, we've got a reasonably safe address to advance all this.  Left to little TK and picowatt - then there would be those of you who would be forever DUPED.  God forbid. And God knows they are well able to persuade the weak minded.

Rosie Pose

The only way it could be just beginning, is if you have a new circuit. All you have so far is a circuit that interupts the battery to the load at very high frequency, paused once in a while to the beat of the signal generator.

I have waited and waited for you to prove anything real here. But that day never comes.

And I am now putting my money on, that it never will. A sure thing. 

Mags

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 28, 2012, 01:21:39 AM
lol.  Magsy you sound like MileHigh.  'Everything's over'. 

Take heart.  Indeed everything is just beginning.  Thankfully not through the rather absurd efforts of our members who contribute so dilligently to this thread.  Commentary hereafter will be much BROADER and infinitely more dependable - than the sad efforts of these pretenders to the 'right to comment'.  Then we'll get some science back onto this subject.  And as ever, we've got a reasonably safe address to advance all this.  Left to little TK and picowatt - then there would be those of you who would be forever DUPED.  God forbid. And God knows they are well able to persuade the weak minded.

Rosie Pose

I have never weighed in one way or another regarding the efficiency of your circuit.  TK and .99 have presented more credible evidence regarding that than I have seen from you.  I do not, however, believe that a neg mean pwr measurement as measured, and as sole evidence, indicates a "COP=infinity".  I also believe that your definition and use of the term "COP=infinity" is both innaccurate and misleading.

I do, however, know how to use a 'scope, a FG, and MOSFET's.  In FIG 3 and FIG7 of your first paper, there is sufficient gate drive being indicated to turn Q1 fully on.  But the CSR trace does not indicate the expected current flow.

So, again, why is Q1 not turning on?  When you answer this question properly, I am sure you will immediately make the necessary corrections to your papers, won't you?

Quote from: Magluvin on June 28, 2012, 01:34:04 AM
I have waited and waited for you to prove anything real here. But that day never comes.

And I am now puttingmy money on, that it never will. A sure thing. 

Mags

How much Magsy?  I'll wager here - gladly.

Rosie Pose