What about these significant results that the trolls have sought to bury:

Tar Baby runs on CAPACITORS ONLY, making a NEGATIVE MEAN POWER PRODUCT, with oscillations that DO NOT VISIBLY DECAY FOR A SIGNIFICANT TIME PERIOD before they collapse just like those from a battery supply would, if you only had the attention span needed to determine it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-Awd8_Xro0


Function Generators DO IN FACT pass current from an external battery source, through the ground and probe tip leads, to an external load in a complete circuit, with both the battery and the FG acting in series as power sources, with the resultant output voltage being the algebraic sum of the two voltages at any instant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuBWVmRmUtc

Go ahead now, spin and dig, you tiny army of petty-minded trolls. Bring in another truckload or two of insignificant, off topic bloviation in an attempt to rebury without discussion these two HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT video demonstrations, both of which refute various Ainslie claims as simply as making oxtail soup.

so you're saying, basically, that rose's circuit is a class E amplifier... interesting because everyone knows those are pretty efficient. 90-95% or something like that right... and didn't you say somewhere on record that rose's circuit isn't? nevermind,  i'm sure i can find it...

thanks for spamming that picture again...

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on June 28, 2012, 03:28:13 PM
so you're saying, basically, that rose's circuit is a class E amplifier... interesting because everyone knows those are pretty efficient. 90-95% or something like that right... and didn't you say somewhere on record that rose's circuit isn't? nevermind,  i'm sure i can find it...

thanks for spamming that picture again...

You don't have to look far, Strawman Constructor Wilby.
Ainslie's circuit is INefficient because its capacitances and inductances are not tuned. Take a look at the top trace in my scopeshots. See that 600 volt spike, being delivered from the transistor to the primary coil, from a 35 volt input? See how clean it is? That, Wilby, you mosfet-data-sheet-consumer, is why a ClassE tuned circuit is so efficient. Compare that waveform with any of Ainslie's, and then go back to eating your own stuffing, you barely domesticated turkey. Ainslie's circuit is not properly tuned and the radiation from the primary load is wasted as heat only. When MY circuit is operating in clean ClassE mode, the mosfet stays cool, even though it's carrying six amps.

Oh... and did I mention the 20+ kV output? Sorry, I must have forgotten.

ETA: Actually, Wilby, you calorimetrically challenged energy consumer you, Ainslie's circuit is 100 percent efficient. Put it and its batteries in a big calorimeter and measure the energy it puts out until it stops putting it out. This will equal the energy put into the battery in the first place, minus some small losses due to the calorimeter's inevitable leakage.

Oh.... and by the way:

-- 5.9 megaJoules claimed, and no battery capacity given, in the JNP "publication"

-- retraction claimed, but not actually done

-- the water wasn't actually boiling but there were small bubbles (lol)

-- Function Generators Can and DO pass current in the manner Ainslie has denied

-- IRFPG50 mosfets, and many others, ARE repetitive avalanche rated, with hard numbers for the designers who understand what they mean

-- Tar Baby, which uses the NERD circuit EXACTLY (oh... no.... it does NOT, because it doesn't have clipleads or a white pegboard, does it Wilby) runs exactly on capacitors as it does on batteries, just not for as long, and so will the NERD circuit when tested with the appropriately sized capacitor bank. Or even with a much smaller one, if the NERDS can figure out how to make a "single-shot" trace with their fancy Etch-a-Sketch toy oscilloscope. (A Bottom-Line LeCroy affordable hobbyist's model. If she can insult my oscilloscope, that was used in weapons research at LLNL in the eighties, I can damn well insult hers, which has been used for nothing but painting pretty pictures--- and for demolishing her own claims with her own data, of course).

-- the issue of the Q1 not turning on and passing current, that PW asks about and that needs to be explained because the explanation might INVALIDATE the whole papers just for that reason alone. This question MUST be answered satisfactorily. No doubt PW has demonstrated for himself with his own components, as I have, that those traces CANNOT POSSIBLY be duplicated with the schematic claimed and a functioning mosfet in place.

All these issues, and more, Wilby, are just some of the SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS that have been buried recently by the trolling and bloviation and doggerel and insults from Ainslie that you lot post instead of actually dealing with the REAL ISSUES.

Here is Sassy ClassE, nearly dressed out, fully self-contained except for the RF ground, with 4 Tar Baby batteries.

And here is a rough map of its field while running the Corona Motor at about 5 amps input. I opened the shutter for 30 seconds (f/16, ISO200) and used the NE-2 bulb on a stick, not connected to anything, and moved it around the secondary. I didn't want to get too close, but it's easy to get an idea of the shape and strength of the field.

For scale, the secondary coil form is a 6" length of PVC and about 5 3/4 inches of it is wound with #27 magnet wire. The primary is 14 ga house wiring insulated solid copper and the 5 turns span just under 0.6 inch.