Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 29, 2012, 11:15:49 PM
LOL.  Thanks for the links guys.  Frankly I prefer Guest's version to the original.  It's BRILLIANT.  And as usual - it seems that I am WAY out of step with the times.  One day - hopefully - I'll catch up.  It strikes me that there's a world of really brilliant commentary out there.  My new favourite is COLBERT.  What a GENIUS. 

Anyway.  Sorry for the distraction Little TK.  Far be it from me to take this subject OFF TOPIC.  That's YOUR mission in life.

Rosie Pose

What good is a post without a few digs and jabs included?

****** BUMP ******

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on June 29, 2012, 08:24:05 AM

You cant even supply one (1) complete set of test data for a single claimed COP>INFINITY device test and haven't produced anything new in over a year just bloviating and baiting for fights wasting everyone's time.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 29, 2012, 08:34:39 AM
Not actually.  I both can and have. 

Rosie Pose

RIGHT Rosemary .... slime your way out of these two questions, I'm sure the "Open Source Community" would like to see answers without your constant bloviating

1) Where is your publically available posted link with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located "specifically" for Test #3 referenced in your "Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus" ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf [attached file] ) that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ??

2) Where is your publically available posted link with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located for "ANY" test using a 555 timer replacing the functions generator that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ??

Quote from: MileHigh on June 29, 2012, 11:14:21 PM
PW:

In the Bizarro Universe, you want your car to get less gas mileage.

http://forums.vwvortex.com/showthread.php?4639091-Archive-1958-Bulgemobile-Catalog-%28Rare-Find...%29

MileHigh

Not sure if I've done it right - but here's a link from your link - MH.

Rosie Pose
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HdqAwXgGe8

Hello Magsy,

I see you're still going on and on.

Quote from: Magluvin on June 29, 2012, 11:09:06 PM
On that spec title page, they list standard features features of the device, 6 of them

Number 2 on that list is,  "Repetitive Avalanche Rated".

To me, it seems to be an important feature of this transistor that it is capable of handling a rated avalanche state, "Repetitively".  That means it is rated to be in a circuit by where the circuit could cause an avalanche state, "repetitively".  Can we all agree on that?

Otherwise why would it be stated in the top 6 features of this transistor, coming in at number 2 in that list?

There are data sheets for transistors that dont show this as a feature or quality. So why would this sheet do so?  An error? Typo? Is it there just for all to ignore? ?

You said  "I stand my my earlier statement.  This is not and never has been the object of a transistor.  Or that's certainly as I understand it."

Or certainly as you understand it?  Well ya must be stuck in groundhog day with Bill Murray. Because you seem to refuse to try and understand something new to you. At least Bill took advantage of it. He learned something new every day.  This transistor sheet does show that your transistor is designed to do just that, Avalanche Repetitively. Ya might want to write that down.
You can go ahead and stand by your words.              Im going to stand over here. 

Mags

No question my understanding is at fault.  And thankfully you ARE standing over there.  That's quite a good pun Magsy.

Rosie Pose

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on June 29, 2012, 11:30:32 PM
****** BUMP ******



RIGHT Rosemary .... slime your way out of these two questions, I'm sure the "Open Source Community" would like to see answers without your constant bloviating

1) Where is your publically available posted link with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located "specifically" for Test #3 referenced in your "Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus" ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf [attached file] ) that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ??

2) Where is your publically available posted link with the downloadable complete set thats all in one place of the LeCroy scope shots and all the accompanying data dump spreadsheet files, including the device schematic and any photographs located for "ANY" test using a 555 timer replacing the functions generator that was used for your conclusions and claim(s) of the COP>INFINITY operation ??

Hi Fuzzy

How's that 'class action' lawsuit coming on?  Do let us know.  I've told you where to present your papers.  And I know your address if you ever want a reply.

Rosie Pose