Quote from: WilbyInebriated on June 30, 2012, 01:02:34 AM
facepalm indeed... your 'load' isn't a heater. measure the 'efficiency' of rose's heater and then measure the efficiency of your crappy little tesla coil "actually doing something useful: make corona and ozone to purify and beautify the environment" with the same criteria you used for rose's circuit and present your data.

you've been ionizing your vodka again haven't you...

Avoiding the question as usual. You still haven't even told me whether you've stopped beating your dog or not.

HOW MANY, Wilby? How many CFLs can Ainslie light up?

Or, to put it another way.... measure SassyClassE using the SAME CRITERION used by Ainslie to claim super efficiency: the negative mean power product. Would you like to wager upon the outcome?
Compare, contrast, conclude.

Who's stultified now, you Latinate trenchfoot sockwearer.

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on June 30, 2012, 01:14:28 AM
and yet here you are... four years later...

Look in the mirror, Wilby. What do you see?

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 01:15:50 AM

Who's stultified now, you Latinate trenchfoot sockwearer.

LOL.  I think you're rather stultified TK.  And I think this is a fair description of you. All round.  You've a choice turn of phrase and a bottomless reach of insult.  Quite amusing.  In its way.  But sadly.  All you EVER do is congratulate yourself.  It's getting a bit boring.  The more so as the rest of us don't see that much cause.

Rosie Pose

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 01:15:50 AM
Avoiding the question as usual. You still haven't even told me whether you've stopped beating your dog or not.

another logical fallacy as usual... and you still haven't offered up that public mea culpa you owe me...

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 01:15:50 AM
HOW MANY, Wilby? How many CFLs can Ainslie light up?

irrelevant

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 01:15:50 AM
Or, to put it another way.... measure SassyClassE using the SAME CRITERION used by Ainslie to claim super efficiency: the negative mean power product. Would you like to wager upon the outcome?
Compare, contrast, conclude.

but those "CRITERION" are flawed according to you and milelow and poynty and pico etc. etc.

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 01:15:50 AM
Who's stultified now, you Latinate trenchfoot sockwearer.

still you... as you seem to think your crappy tesla coil is more efficient than an electric heater...

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 01:16:32 AM
Look in the mirror, Wilby. What do you see?

another logical fallacy (ad hominem tu quo que this time)... don't you ever get tired of using those?
i see you troll...

Look, Wilby's tied himself up in knots. Granny knots, not shipshape bowlines or ring bends too.

He thinks Ainslie's circuit is a heater, when it's really a battery non-charger.

And it's extremely efficient at that, Wilby. It non-charges its battery with COP > INFINITY. READ THE PAPERS, which contain her claims. Any heat it produces is extra, a byproduct of it not charging its batteries.

And he thinks that looking in a mirror is an abusive argument against him personally, instead of simply pointing out his own location in time. Is that a fisherman's bend, there, Wilby, or just a slipknot?

How many CFLs can Ainslie's circuit light up, Wilby? Is ClassE the same as an Ainslie circuit, an inductive clamp test circuit, a deliberately feeding-back RF oscillator, the circuit listed in the .pdf you linked? Or not? Do you have some more oranges to compare, to see if they are really apples or not? Or maybe your problem is just that all your grapes are sour.

After all these years YOU STILL BEING HERE, they would be. Try making wine, that doesn't take much manual skill, just your own foot-stomping calhounedness will take care of it.