Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 166 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

@PW:
Who knows. It's another example of her fractured fairy tales. I just tried to find the original source but I lost interest. Maybe FTC remembers where it came from; I think it's in one of the old locked threads, and it must be from after 19 April 2011 since that was about when her error was brought to light by .99. Or.... depending on whether you believe that she already knew or not... the coverup was brought to light.

Here's my favorite version of the schematic, from one of the many different versions of the "paper" that she's posted and hasn't cleaned up. I like the "swastika" design.

I guess those rectangular things with bipolar transistor base symbols in them are supposed to be mosfets. At least she got the pinouts right for TO-247/TO-3P.

TinselKoala

Yeah, what is up with those silly engineers anyway? Anybody can see that a mosfet is rectangular.... so why do we use a round circuit symbol for it?
:-\

picowatt

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 06:26:23 PM
Yeah, what is up with those silly engineers anyway? Anybody can see that a mosfet is rectangular.... so why do we use a round circuit symbol for it?
:-\

TK,

I can live with it.  I've seen all kinds of wierd symbols from low cost software.

At least this one is wired as in the paper, with a single Q2.

pW

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 05:10:49 PM
Sic.

You idiot Rosemary. Look at YOUR circuit diagram. THE SOURCE OF Q2 AND THE GATE OF Q2 ARE NOT CONNECTED. Except of course through the function generator. Now, since the FG puts one polarity at one wire and the other polarity at the other wire...Well, DO THE MATH.

Of course if you are using a DIFFERENT schematic.... why don't you reveal it? It would explain much that is currently unexplained. Pun intended.

you idiot TK.  Look at any MOSFET anywhere in the whole wide world.  IF their source and gate legs were NOT connected then they would not able to conduct ANYTHING EVER.

So.  When you can explain how it is possible that the source and gate leg of Q2 are NOT connected then I'll fully appreciate your argument or even picowatt's argument.

Rosie Pose

fuzzytomcat

Howdy everyone,

Here is my collection of Rosemary's COP>INFINITY device schematics or diagrams that have been posted by Rosemary "somewhere" but not all in one place.  ::)

With exception to the first which is "Fig 12a" ( RA_001_018_.JPG ) in the International Rectifier IRFPG50 HEXFET® Power MOSFET data sheet. ( file attached [ irfpg50.pdf ])

FTC
;)