Ainslie said,

QuoteHe CLAIMS that I EVER referred to what he calls his ALTOID test. (That name's to shake loose from the stigma of 'The Tar Baby)

Yes, that's right, Ainslie. I CLAIM YOU DID REFER TO THE ALTOID, and not only that you LIED ABOUT IT to your readers and have not corrected your lies.
To wit, you twit:

QuoteGuys - I've yet again been advised to stay away from this thread.  It's really achieving absolutely NOTHING - and I know this.

In any event just let me explain this much. TK is WELL able to get that oscillation from Q2 with a CONTINUAL NEGATIVE SIGNAL applied to the gate. As are we  And that's only with the use of Q2.  IF there's a continual negative charge - and YET there's an oscillation - then he's yet to explain how the battery discharges current NOTWITHSTANDING the restriction imposed at the gate of the transistor - from that negative voltage signal applied. Remember that each positive half of each of those oscillations represents the current flow from the battery supply.  So. Where is the path for that?  Certainly not across that gate.

It's absurd that they pretend to have the answers.  They're nowhere near.  Nor are we.  But we at least have a consistent argument proposed for consideration.

Regards,
Rosemary

Let me add this while I can still modify this post.  I'm referring to the circuit that he uses with just one MOSFET.  Hope that's clearer.

Again
R

Emphasis in the original, actually, Ainslie: You are talking about ALTOID.

Yes, Ainslie, liar, it is clear that you are referring to the only circuit I've shown that uses just one mosfet and that makes your oscillations. But it doesn't do it the way you MENDACIOUSLY CLAIM that it does, as I have proven with the scopeshot.

NOW, you liar, I Again demand that you retract this claim and correct it ON YOUR FORUM so that your builders can know the truth and so that you do not continue to MISLEAD THEM with your lies and false claims.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 04, 2012, 09:29:55 AM
Hi Guys,

Please refer to this link written in answer to picowatt's last post.

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2313.msg2487.html#msg2487

Regards,
Rosemary

Silly me, I actually thought you were finally going to answer just about the very first question I ever asked you, which is "why is Q1 not turning on in FIG3 and FIG7?".

But instead, just more childish gibberish.  You sully Rossi's work by association.

This is pointless.  You either refuse to learn, are unable to learn, or are textbook "willfully ignorant".   These are the only options I can derive from your responses.  Again, the reader will have to choose which is most likely.

Hopefully, by now, you have attracted enough attention to this thread from your posts over there that the readers there have visited here and acquired a better understanding of how both you, and your circuit, actually operate.

Ainslie said, lying:

QuoteMeanwhile, for the record - there was an UNEQUIVOCAL ALLEGATION by picowatt (the picointellect with picoaccrditation) and  by TK (the pickle of no mean dimensions) that energy was discharged from the battery through the Gate of Q1 to the Source Leg of Q2 - alternatively from the Source leg of Q2 to the Gate Leg of Q1 - on numerous occasions.

Not ACTUALLY, Ainslie, you blind bloviating idiot. You are once again posting nonsense and lies.

What is UNEQUIVOCALLY TRUE is that the "Gate of Q1 to the Source Leg of Q2" are PHYSICALLY CONNECTED BY WIRES, and that the  "Source leg of Q2 to the Gate Leg of Q1" are the SAME WIRES in the other direction.

When, for goodness sakes, will you EVER learn to read a simple circuit diagram?

Or are you now CHANGING THE SCHEMATIC YET AGAIN without telling anyone? That would explain a lot.... and it would also continue to illustrate your boundless mendacity.

Ainslie said,

QuoteTK (the pickle of no mean dimensions)

Well... since Ainslie is so obsessed with the dimensions of my pickle, I'll let her have this closeup image of my pickle of no mean dimensions.

I wear size 12 shoes, and my glove size is Extra Large, and my hat size is 7 3/4, and I weigh 182 pounds.

Are there any other of my dimensions that you wonder about, in the sweltering South African nights when you can't sleep, Ainslie?

QuoteWhat is UNEQUIVOCALLY TRUE is that the "Gate of Q1 to the Source Leg of Q2" are PHYSICALLY CONNECTED BY WIRES, and that the  "Source leg of Q2 to the Gate Leg of Q1" are the SAME WIRES in the other direction.

Laugh or cry?

One thing for certain, is that for months and months Rosemary has been unable to compose a few sentences that make sense when she tries to discuss the gates and sources of Q1 and the Q2 array and mysterious interconnection between the two.  It's like it's a mental block or something.  Does not compute.

Blame it on the INDUCTIVE LAWS or the zipon-synapse interactions or Rosemary's Uncertainty Principle.

You may have seen the Johnny Depp movie Ed Wood.  There is something Ed Woodsian about the whole thing.  Surrealistic zipon.

Go ask Rosie, when she's ten feet tall.

MileHigh