Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 165 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

"Does it still increase input the further away as before?"

No, now as I get to the right tuning the light is very bright, constant, and the current draw stays almost constant at about 2.2 amps until it slips out of resonance at about 8 inches away now.

TinselKoala

Chessnyt, you are a reprehensible liar. YOU CANNOT SUPPORT ANYTHING YOU CLAIM ABOUT ME with actual references, facts, or demonstrations of your own.

For example.... post a link to some other forum where I post. Go ahead, you lying troll. Refute a SINGLE ONE of the points I've made in ANY of my demonstrations. YOU CANNOT, you lying troll.

Prove that MH and I are "tag team partners", you lying troll. You cannot. Just because two people see the same mendacity and foolishness and are willing to point it out vociferously... that does not make them partners, you lying troll.

Go ahead, post a link to some of this DISINFORMATION that MH or I have posted and that you want removed, you lying troll. YOU CANNOT.

You people who make outrageous claims without being able to support them, and who falsely accuse others of WHAT YOU YOURSELVES DO ALL THE TIME... you disgust me.

Ainslie has lied over and over, and every day she continues to lie about her circuit and about us here on this thread. And now she's got another liar coming along with some more lies of his own. But what she doesn't have is ANY PROOF OR SUPPORT FOR HER CLAIMS, because her own data show that they are bogus.



TinselKoala

Ainslie, you are truly a bloviating idiot. Do you even possess a dictionary? There are many available on the internet and they ALL AGREE THAT "DATA" is a PLURAL noun, but BOTH USAGES ARE STANDARD. Mine, however, is more correct since your data DO NOT SUPPORT YOUR CLAIMS, and also YOUR DATA DOES NOT SUPPORT YOUR CLAIMS.

Here, read and learn, or just look at the shapes, you ignorant cross-forum troll.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/data
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/data
http://www2.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF3/334.html
etc, etc.


QuoteUnlike the laws of science, the laws of language are often subject to the will of the people. And while we cannot change carefully tested scientific truths to fit the fashion, grammarian's rules, when they no longer serve clarity or naturalness of expression, we can throw out the window.
Curiously, scientific writing often contains a mixture of wild experimentation with language and strict adherence to aging rules of usage. New words are often coined recklessly by compounding ordinary words or fragments into technical monsters or awkward hybrids. (A paper was once written about "geochronobioclimatopaleomagnetostratigraphy".) But one rule of usage is dear to every technical writer; it concerns the use of the word data.
Did you know that it is correct to say "The data have reached my desk," and "The data are conclusive," but wrong to say "The data has...," "The data is..."? A Latin word, data is the plural form of datum and therefore requires a plural verb.
Nevertheless, many people feel the word has been Americanized, that it now refers to a collective unit, and takes a singular verb. In fact, of the 136 distinguished consultants on usage polled for the 1975 Harper Dictionary of Contemporary Usage, 49% responded that they use "The data is..." in writing. And in casual speech, 65% use data as singular. Those who defend "The data is..." often point to the fact that agenda is also, strictly, a plural, but is nearly always regarded as a single list and takes a singular verb. You'll probably never hear anyone ask: "Are the agenda interesting?
Still, science is a special case; the international transfer of information is vital. Nearly every technical paper will be read by people for whom English is not the primary language, and communication is not served by constant experimentation.
So, on the issue of data in modern American usage, you might say "The data is mixed". But as for consistency in scientific writing, the data are strongly behind it.

There, feel better now? You really should have stayed in school, Ainslie, instead of arguing with your teachers because you already know everything.