Quote from: TinselKoala on July 10, 2012, 10:25:59 AM
I NEARLY FORGOT TO ADD this continuing LIE, the 5.9 megaJoules in 1.6 hours LIE, the BOILING WATER LIE, in an image taken JUST NOW from the ONLY  "official publication" of AInslie's manuscripts.

Hmm, what would it take to burn 5.9 MJ in 1.6 hours, for real? How much water boiling would "really" happen in that amount of time with that much energy used? 


Mags

Polln8r

Attacking or belittling somebody based on their sexuality - regardless of what that person's preference may be - is INDEED tactless, offensive and downright primitive.  I am NOT ashamed of myself as I have NEVER been guilty of this.  I strongly adhere to the rights of everyone to express whichever proclivities they desire sexual or otherwise.  But always excepting misogynists - ageists - racists and educational elitists. But nor am I trying to salvage your good opinion.  If you are in support of the  multiple level of personal attack that is staged by TK where all such censure is evident - then I would prefer NOT to have you support.

Rosemary

Quote from: polln8r on July 10, 2012, 04:13:30 PM
Rosemary,
   
     Attacking or belittling somebody based on sexuality, regardless of what that person's preference may be, is something I find completely tactless, offensive, and downright primitive. You should be ashamed of yourself, and any sympathy I may have had for you regarding what has been said about you, your circuit, or your methods has vanished completely. I have no respect for bigotry and am disgusted that you would stoop so low.

No warm regards here,
polln8r.

Quote from: Magluvin on July 10, 2012, 06:02:00 PM
I was one to defend her, till she misread or chose to define another way, a couple of my posts. Even though I tried to point those items out to her, she began making comments as to my intelect, knowledge, even my spelling, of which there are numerous misspelling by her here in the past.  Black black kettle kettle, what?  ;]

All will eventually flee from her, when it is their time.
Like Scientology, as of late. 

Ive waited and waited for her to do her thing and prove them wrong. Well while waiting, I started paying more attn to the arguments, and, well she hasnt provided much against the consistency of others here have, as to their conclusions.

Waited and waited, faught and faught, and more waiting. But it seems all she has left is to just "try" to apply negative agitation and name calling and fib after fib. Just fibbin all ova diss place! Never "really" showing herself to be a step above or even at the level of anyone here, which is what I expected from her.

So, Ive given in to the dark side. ;] Since that is where all the light is. ;]  I just had to remove my goofy goggles, to see what is real.

Mags

LOL.  Sorry to see this Magsy.  You must resist that 'dark side' just a little bit longer.  I PROMISE YOU that I'll be starting my tests - just as soon as my apparatus is returned.

Brilliantly (as polln8r puts it) warm regards,
Rosie Pose

Guys, this post is most assuredly for TK's thread.  I have some cysts diagnosed that have to be removed.  The news is not pleasant - except obviously that our Little TK will be delighted.  This was a 'wake up call' for me.  I've never really enjoyed a robust good health.  But this diagnosis has been a salutary reminder that one is not actually invincible and - the older one gets the more aware one is of one's mortality.  In any event.  I advise all and sundry that if they can avoid it - better not to grow old.  I'm ONLY afraid of dying of old age - so am not that concerned at the possible implications of all this.  But I most certainly AM concerned if it means that in my absense, my work in this field will be trashed by the mindless and irrelevant posts that TK indulges in this thread - without any reasonable protester coming to its rescue.  It is - most assuredly - the single most disgusting thread that has ever disgraced any forum anywhere at all.

So.  Let me re-iterate.  We have a paper that shows proof of a measured anomaly - specifically COP infinity.  The paper that has been published in JONP included errors.  For reasons that I do not understand it has not been corrected.  Hopefully, in due course, when those involved have more time - then this will be attended to.  That paper unequivocally refers to the evidence of steam at 62 degrees centigrade or thereby.  TK is trying to argue that this is incorrect.  He is wrong.  Steam is simply the evidence of evaporation at an accelerated rate due to increased energy applied to that water.  Under pressure steam is ALWAYS exploitable.  That was our point.  We have NEVER measured the temperature of the water.  We ONLY measured the temperature of the element in conjunction with that water.  His multiple bases of objections are utterly spurious - offensive - and slanderous.  And it is always more than a little insulting to be obliged to answer them.  I am SATISFIED that it is this thread that has induced this horrible sickness in me.  Effectively TK's unadulterated hate has had it's desired consequence.

His efforts here are so utterly devoid of good intention, reason, or moderation that it is an indictment - not only on Harti Berlin - but on all those posters that contribute in support of TK's hate.

Regards
Rosemary

OK Rosemary,
a quote from you on your site:

    "And they're rather sick - phsychologically.  All of them.  I don't want to go into the personality profiles of any of them - in any depth - but one of them is a closet gay - another is vulgarian of rather disgusting dimensions.  A third is a drug abuser and a fourth is - if you can believe it - a religious fanatic."

    Is this not meant as an attack on the character of the people you've referred to? Is the phrase "a closet gay" not meant to be belittling the person of whom you speak? The three characterizations that follow surely seem to be, so it's not difficult to assume that was.

Apologies if I misjudged that whole bit,

polln8r