Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 10, 2012, 11:58:10 PM
And as for THIS!!!!!!
HAVE THE COURTESY TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I'VE ANSWERED YOUR ALLEGATIONS - INSINUATIONS - ACCUSATIONS - RELATED TO STEAM.  AND TO YOUR ACCUSATIONS RELATED TO MY PAPER...YOU HORRIBLE LITTLE MAN.

R

Rose, you better go back and look at that quote you posted of TK.  It contained nothing in reference to you.  Your response is just insane if it is in reference to the post you pasted.  LOOK!

MaGs

Quote from: Magluvin on July 11, 2012, 12:25:29 AM
Rose, you better go back and look at that quote you posted of TK.  It contained nothing in reference to you.  Your response is just insane if it is in reference to the post you pasted.  LOOK!

MaGs

I KNOW THIS MAGS.  What is wrong with you?  He posted half a page related to the REFUTATION OF STEAM as detailed in our paper.  I ANSWERED HIS REFUTATION.  HE IGNORED MY ANSWER.  I was referring to the fact that he NEVER ACKNOWLEDGES AN ANSWER - OR HE DENIES ITS RELEVANCE.  It's DISGUSTING.

Rosemary

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 10, 2012, 11:55:09 PM
Not actually Mags.  Picowatt's questions were answered on my locked thread.  He simply denied that they'd been answered.  I re-answered them - YET AGAIN.  And he simply continued to ask them.  You really need to see the big picture.  It's the fact that these pages are turned so quickly and none of you have the kind of interest that extends past the last page turned.  Sadly.  Which makes those propaganda techniques HIGHLY efficient.

Rosemary

You did not answer his questions in the locked thread.

I have been over it several times looking for your "answers" and your "retractions" that you have claimed are there, and they cannot be found.Not only that but I have the entire thread archived for reference locally in case it's removed.

Why don't you simply post a link to the place in the thread where you have answered them? We KNOW you know how to post links, Ainslie.

Why don't you PROVE your contention with an actual REFERENCE for once? Because you CANNOT, that's why.

Do you think that thread is unavailable because it's locked? Contrariwise, it is still available for anyone to read. You can jump in anywhere.

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg318688/#msg318688

YOU need to see the big picture, Ainslie. You never answered PW's questions AT ALL, nor did you answer the same questions when .99 asked them over a year ago.

IF YOU DID.... refute me by simply posting a link to where you DID answer them.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 11, 2012, 12:28:32 AM
I KNOW THIS MAGS.  What is wrong with you?  He posted half a page related to the REFUTATION OF STEAM as detailed in our paper.  I ANSWERED HIS REFUTATION.  HE IGNORED MY ANSWER.  I was referring to the fact that he NEVER ACKNOWLEDGES AN ANSWER - OR HE DENIES ITS RELEVANCE.  It's DISGUSTING.

Rosemary

You are a liar plain and simple.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 10, 2012, 11:04:42 PM
If there is any characterisation that is censorial - it is the 'closet' part of the closet gay and there is nothing intended to belittle anyone.  It is simply a schedule of their OBVIOUS personality traits.  God knows - someone needs to point out that they're not exactly 'wholesome'.

regards
Rosemary

Here's evidence of ACTUAL 'belittling'.  Calling me a liar in every sentence.  Suggesting that my diagrams show MOSFETS engaged in sexual congruence.  Suggesting sexual congruence in his videos when he illustrated my tests.  Shouting to the world that I'm addled and senile and utterly bereft of intellect, reason or education.  Showing DELIGHT when I report the death of a close family member.  NEED I GO ON?

You forgot "And they're rather sick - phsychologically.  All of them.  I don't want to go into the personality profiles of any of them - in any depth - but one of them is a closet gay..."

Oh... wait... That was YOU, AINSLIE, that said that, wasn't it. Not intended to belittle anyone, at all, in any way. Just intended to call them... what? Not a belittling comment at all, is it. Not belittling them for their sexual orientation or their desires to keep it "in the closet" or not... are you, Ainslie?

Yes, you hypocritical liar, you ARE.

In addition, you should go back and look again at what I said when you made your last desperate plea for sympathy. I did not express or show DELIGHT as you claim. Rather I pointed out that we all lose loved ones and that it does not entitle you a "pass" on your continued false claims and your continuous misstating the words and meanings of others. I deeply regret that you are such a jerk to use your relative's death as a plea for some special treatment here.