Don't forget... last year she went for a solid MONTH, over 400 posts, deliberately misleading everyone about the schematic they claimed to use in the video demo that she denied posting to her own YT account. And just a few days ago she bemoaned the fact that she and .99 couldn't have kept it under wraps for even longer. .99's "rather unfortunate" publication of the correct schematic... at least correct for THAT DEMO... upset her duplicitous applecart, though.

There is absolutely no telling how she had things hooked up, for any trial except those where we can see actual photographs of the apparatus. SHE CAN'T EVEN READ a schematic today. And after all this... especially the demo, where one schematic was shown in the video (incorrect, a single mosfet and no FG black lead), another described in the video ( all 5 in parallel), two more given in the "papers" describing the demonstration's trials, and a fifth one finally shown to be used, by .99...... after all that, and her express admission that she deliberately wanted to keep that schematic secret..... how can anyone believe anything she says about schematics and what was used when?

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 21, 2012, 01:24:45 AM
Don't forget... last year she went for a solid MONTH, over 400 posts, deliberately misleading everyone about the schematic they claimed to use in the video demo that she denied posting to her own YT account. And just a few days ago she bemoaned the fact that she and .99 couldn't have kept it under wraps for even longer. .99's "rather unfortunate" publication of the correct schematic... at least correct for THAT DEMO... upset her duplicitous applecart, though.

There is absolutely no telling how she had things hooked up, for any trial except those where we can see actual photographs of the apparatus. SHE CAN'T EVEN READ a schematic today. And after all this... especially the demo, where one schematic was shown in the video (incorrect, a single mosfet and no FG black lead), another described in the video ( all 5 in parallel), two more given in the "papers" describing the demonstration's trials, and a fifth one finally shown to be used, by .99...... after all that, and her express admission that she deliberately wanted to keep that schematic secret..... how can anyone believe anything she says about schematics and what was used when?

Indeed - TK.  I was MOST anxious to prevent either you or FTC from stealing this as is your wont.  SADLY it didn't work.  You've attempted to appropriate this as your own work - and as expected.  And like FTC you're also trying to trivialise the numbers.  And sadly - there's nothing I can do to stop you short of those demonstrations.  Then you'll need to learn to sing to another tune.  Or you'll need to be very busy decrying the evidence in spite of that evidence.  Can't wait.  My apparatus will be back on MONDAY.  And then it's ready - set - go.  How nice is that?

Rosie Posie

ADDED
AND TODAY IS OUR WINTER EQUINOX.  THINGS CAN ONLY GET BETTER HERE IN THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE.  A NICE OMEN FOR US.  Not so good for you TK - picowatt - Sean - Mookie - The boss - and the rest.  I believe you're moving into a winter.  I trust it will only give you all a great deal of 'discontent'.

R

 

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 21, 2012, 01:17:53 AM
Yes it's hard to believe.  If you push 10 quarters in at one end then DOWN THAT LINE ten quarters need to be replaced - one, by one, by one.  No other way to complete that journey.  And that speed is NOT at light speed.  It is measurably SLOWER.  That's NOT my argument.  That's our EXPERTS.  And they really do know how to measure this. So.  If you choose to believe this - then, frankly, you're on your own.  But feel free.  No-one is prescribing beliefs.  It's just that belief has nothing to do with science.
YES INDEED.  We've measured it in both our COP>17 tests and in our NERD circuits.  And we've reconciled it with the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron.  We've argued it as a field - and we've used self-consistent arguments THROUGHOUT.

added
Here's the multiple proof...
It reconciles the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron
It reconciles the Casimir effect
It reconciles the gravitational force
It answers to the requirement of missing matter measured by our astrophysicists
It conforms to the non-standard properties of the Higgs Boson
It reconciles all the forces
It conforms to known physical principles
It conforms to the composite structure proposed in the protons
It introduces the concept of a fundamental particle as the basis of all particles as required by our particle physicists
It conforms IN WHOLE AND IN PART to the requirement of our string theorists.

That's not a bad start.

Rosie
added...It conforms IN WHOLE AND IN PART to the requirement of our string theorists.

It's a stupid bunch of word salad, that's what it is. Go ahead, show us here just exactly how it "reconciles the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron". You cannot. You don't even understand how to derive quantities at all. You are dreaming.

You can't even _define_ the Casimir effect, and when you start talking about "our string theorists" I cannot even imagine the jumble of nonsense that you have inside your head. YOU CAN'T EVEN GET A SIMPLE STATEMENT ABOUT YOUR OWN CIRCUIT RIGHT. Over and over you misrepresent and misunderstand the simplest things people say to you. And you really expect people to believe that you understand the things you mention above. You are a real joke, Ainslie. Your "thesis" does none of the things you think it does, at all. You cannot use it to predict a single valid experimental result, for example. You cannot use it to explain HOW A CAPACITOR FUNCTIONS. You cannot use it to explain ANY of the phenomena I show in my videos concerning caps, mosfets and their relationship to your circuit. In short, your word salad "thesis" is not worth the pixels used to display it.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 21, 2012, 01:30:14 AM
Indeed - TK.  I was MOST anxious to prevent either you or FTC from stealing this as is your wont.  SADLY it didn't work.  You've attempted to appropriate this as your own work - and as expected.  And like FTC you're also trying to trivialise the numbers.  And sadly - there's nothing I can do to stop you short of those demonstrations.  Then you'll need to learn to sing to another tune.  Or you'll need to be very busy decrying the evidence in spite of that evidence.  Can't wait.  My apparatus will be back on MONDAY.  And then it's ready - set - go.  How nice is that?

Rosie Posie

ADDED
AND TODAY IS OUR WINTER EQUINOX.  THINGS CAN ONLY GET BETTER HERE IN THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE.  A NICE OMEN FOR US.  Not so good for you TK - picowatt - Sean - Mookie - The boss - and the rest.  I believe you're moving into a winter.  I trust it will only give you all a great deal of 'discontent'.

R

AND TODAY IS OUR WINTER EQUINOX.

Golly, Ainslie... on what planet do you live? THE EQUINOXES OCCUR IN MARCH AND SEPTEMBER, on Earth, you idiot. And the solstices in June and December.

And today is.... JULY 21. In other words, you once again talk about something that you know nothing of.


Now there will be post after post of Ainslie telling us that no matter what WIKI, or astronomers might say, THE WINTER EQUINOX IN SOUTH AFRICA is on July 21st.

And I believe that in the middle of July in South Texas.... we are pretty durn far from "moving into winter".