You know she can't answer. She does not even comprehend the question.

She has never even checked on the applied signal voltage, because she didn't consider it relevant.

What do you make of that, then, picowatt? I certainly see it as further proof that she is an ignoramus, willfully ignorant and can neither read nor discuss schematics coherently, much less oscilloscope traces. She still has no conception of the linear conductance region of a mosfet's operation. She still believes that DC current flows across the mosfet gate, and that the drain-source channel is either at 0 ohms (sic) or that it's open, "disconnected" and cannot pass any current whatsoever, AC or DC. 

What, I wonder ... does Ainslie think the blue trace represents in all of her scopeshots?
Is there some _other_ applied signal voltage to be considered in the Ainslie apparatus? I don't think so.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 21, 2012, 08:11:14 PM
I don't follow TK's work.  So I won't be watching any of his videos. 

Rosie Pose

Why are you commenting here, then, you hypocrite? Not getting any traffic on your crazy forum? It has been a while since anyone has commented there besides you and your sock puppet chessnutcase.

You won't be watching my videos for the same reason an eight year old child won't watch a scary movie: you'd probably pee in your panties, from seeing so much that terrifies you and that you are just too immature to process.

How do Mosfets Work, Parts 2 and 3. Nine minutes and sixteen seconds of horror,  and think of the fun you will have pointing out just where and how I am wrong in what I show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKstLQYayNA

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 21, 2012, 08:32:10 PM

Rosie Pose

edited.
Deleted two verses as they were repetitive.

Deleted the rest, as they were idiotic and insulting.

Quite right little TK.  I think I've overstayed my welcome. 

Rosie Pose

Don't forget, Ainslie.... from March 22 2011 until April 18 2011, you deliberately lied and misled an entire community of researchers, including active workers like .99 and others, about the actual schematic and arrangement of your transistors. Over 400 forum posts discussing that schematic and that performance, with you, between those dates, are preserved in my database. Every one of them a deliberate, crafty lie... by your own admission. I have your own admission from just a few days ago that you FULLY INTENDED to continue with that fraudulent deception, even at a time when you were trying to get a manuscript published in a scientific journal and were applying for monetary prizes. I have documented proof that you engaged in this deliberate deception and intended to continue it for as long as possible... until .99 spoiled your evil plot.

Documented proof of your month of deception, a very serious thing, there, Ainslie. Don't forget that "little" episode, when you DO THE MATH. I'll be glad to share my proof of this fraud, this utter pseudoscientific misconduct, with your imaginary lawyers or "our" local authorities at any time.

I also have the documented threats that you have made against my physical safety. So just remember: People who live in glass houses shouldn't make oxtail soup.