Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 23, 2012, 03:37:57 AM
The only one of the two of us who has no CLUE how to determine the wattage dissipated at the load is you. We're all still waiting for some measurements.  Clearly you're trying very hard to avoid reference.  I can't help but wonder why?

Lie and insult all you like, bloviating Ainslie liar. I know a lot better than you do exactly how to determine power at the load. YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT POWER IS. One watt is one Joule, remember? Idiot. And I can do it electrically and calorimetrically. You think calorimetry is for someone on a diet.

Quote

And TK.  I'm looking forward to implementing those imaginary procedures from my imaginary lawyers.  I'll do that when I've completed those imaginary tests of mine.  And then you can comment on all those imaginings to your heart's content. 

You had better be careful about what you wish for. I have FACTS and SCIENCE on my side, as well as a large compendium of RECORDS that will prove to anyone that I am right, you are wrong, and in fact, your threats and insults are actually CRIMINAL.

Quote

And while you're at it - we're also all waiting that learned discourse of yours or picowatt's where you EXPLAIN how the battery is fully connected during that oscillation.

You won't watch my videos, which show how a capacitance equal to your mosfet's will indeed pass AC current in spite of NOT PASSING DC at the same time. In short...you still don't know how a mosfet works and you are incapable of learning. We will let .99 explain things to you.... although you are doing a great job of confusing yourself again because you won't even learn the tiny little increments that he is trying to show you.

Quote

What a prize idiot you are.  All you can do is assemble circuitry of greater and greater complexities to confuse the hell out of its actual function and intention.  And then pretend that you know what you're talking about. 

Ainslie, I am transmitting REAL POWER THROUGH SPACE, with great efficiency, using MY KNOWLEDGE of how things work. I've researched the issue, found example circuits, modified them, made advances, and garnered great interest. YOU, on the other hand, can't even hook your oscilloscope up properly, nor report the schematic you use. You are a PRIZE IDIOT indeed, jealous of your betters, so you have to insult them in any way you can. What you NEVER DO, and CANNOT DO, is to refute  me or PW or any one else who corrects you. YOU CANNOT, because you are wrong, laughably and incurably WRONG.

QuoteThe comfort is that you've stopped that laughable exposition on the mysterious electron current flow.  There are always some small mercies on offer.  We're spared those ridiculous analogies that impress the Seans and Mags of this world ... and the PhiChasers.  LOL.

Have I stopped? My how naive you are. Unlike YOU, pitiful Ainslie, I have other, much more important things to do than spend ALL my time addressing the many issues of your bogus set of claims.

QuoteWhat a load of blockheads - to a man.  A bunch of electrical engineers and / or technicians trying to pass themselves  off as EXPERTS in particle physics. There's no such animal.  Two entirely different mindsets.  Two entirely different skill sets.  And yet there's YOU - the shining 'truth' as you present yourself.  What a JOKE.

You are the blockhead JOKE, Ainslie. Look at what YOU have written about particle physics, and electronics. Thousands and thousands of words of logorrhea and schizophrenic word salad, that makes not a single quantitative prediction and is directly contradicted by hundreds of years of experimentation and research... not to mention the very existence of the computer you typed those words on.

Quote
Rosie Pose

added
And may I add.  Had I damaged any equipment then I would have CLAIMED for that damage from an insurance taken out for precisely that purpose.  NO SUCH DAMAGE WAS EVIDENT.  ALSO.  I would have to be as stupid as you to BUY damaged equipment.  That's a skill set that is ONLY entertained by yourself.  God knows your only access to decent equipment is after or before repair.  That's a little puzzle in itself.  LOL

You can add whatever lies you like, apparently, without any regard for truth or logic. You are such a liar. There is NO CONCEIVABLE REASON ON EARTH that you would have sent "your" LeCroy off for "calibration" unless it needed repair. All digital oscilloscopes perform an internal calibration and self-checking routine whenever they are started up. If it fails this internal calibration check... IT IS IN NEED OF REPAIR. If it does not fail.... it does not need calibration. IDIOT.

And I am supposed to be very well funded, am I not? With access to all kinds of special digital equipment. You have no clue whatsoever and you can't even keep your own deluded story straight.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 23, 2012, 03:49:58 AM
And I wonder if I could impose on you TK - to show us the documented PROOF which you claim you have that I was hospitalised from some psychotic incident which you need as PROOF of my being entirely MAD AND DELUDED.  We're all waiting.  Without it I, for one, am rather inclined to think that you're FABRICATING THE TRUTH.  Not all that gleam and glitter that you claim when you reference yourself as THE TRUTH that SHINES OUT all over the place.  LOL

Then.  While you're at it - EXPLAIN EXACTLY WHERE I MADE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF THOSE ZIPPED FILES THAT SEAN AND YOU MADE PUBLIC - AND...

Then show me EXACTLY - with the required LINKS - the DETAILS OF THOSE GENTLEMEN WHOSE NAMES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS YOU PUBLISHED. 

My CLAIM is that both PROVE that you have both RIFLED MY COMPUTER.  And we all know that that's a felony.

Rosie Pose

Highlighted - for emphasis

AND ADDED
Then we will all know that the support that you get from FTC and PICOWATT and the rest is the SUPPORT FOR CRIMINAL ABUSE OF OPEN SOURCE AND CRIMINAL PRACTICES GENERALLY.  What's new? Just a whole bunch of criminals abusing the facility of open source to misdirect the public

No.

Every bit of information in those zipped files was publicly made available BY YOU, Ainslie, on your blogs and on this forum. If you have the wit to do so, you or anyone can look at the filenames and the information in the images and see just exactly where they came from. The accusation that anyone, especially ME, "rifled" your computer is not only a criminal slander, it is stupidly ridiculous.

The names are also in the public record, posted BY YOU, as FTC has already illustrated, and their phone numbers and emails have been given by you WITH EXPRESS PERMISSION TO HAVE THEM CONTACTED, and are easily found as well. Like here:
www.repmet.co.za/services.htm

We've already reproduced the post where you tell Omnibus to "start with these", giving some of the names, and then showing you FREAKING OUT when he actually DOES try to contact some of them. YOU posted every one of the names I REPOSTED, as people who could be contacted to confirm your story. Unfortunately for you... NONE of them has done so.

And you prove your own madness adequately, every day, as in the current post, where you  blatantly scream out your sick paranoid AND IMPOSSIBLE delusions.


And you dare talk about "OPEN SOURCE".... when you refuse to provide your spreadsheet data for inspection and you deliberately LIED about your schematic for almost a MONTH and would have continued longer but for .99's careful work... you are the worst hypocrite I have ever encountered, bar none.

Just to review:

Ainslie, in that last lying post of yours, you accused me of committing, as you say, the FELONY CRIME of unauthorised computer access. You have no evidence whatsoever for that accusation, but FURTHER, you announced in your forum the deliberate intention to sully, or "tar" as you put it, my good name and to do whatever you can to damage me and my reputation.

I want to hear from these lawyers of yours. I have the name of the law firm, from your earlier letter to Stefan. I WILL be contacting them at the opening of business on Monday, with a letter of my own, explaining that accusing someone of a FELONY without any evidence, and THREATENING physical harm and to destroy reputations..... is a no no and will get your hand slapped.

You omitted the LINK - YET AGAIN.  Here's the little ditty with its addendum that you were so careful to EXCLUDE.

Quote from: Rosie on July 21, 2012, 05:47:18 PM
This riddle's for our little TK.

By rights your age needs must be told
Take heart and be a little bold

I know the place where you reside
And who you live with by your side

I know your school I know your major
I know your phone but not your pager

So rest assured my little pickle
Your name will not be worth a nickle.

When I am done then all that tar
Will rub on you and who you are.

And here's a point that makes me laugh
I even have your photograph



And while I'm at it may I add - it's not you sits on that chair
You've photographed your friend TK - I know this from the hair.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 23, 2012, 04:26:30 AM
Just to review:

Ainslie, in that last lying post of yours, you accused me of committing, as you say, the FELONY CRIME of unauthorised computer access. You have no evidence whatsoever for that accusation, but FURTHER, you announced in your forum the deliberate intention to sully, or "tar" as you put it, my good name and to do whatever you can to damage me and my reputation.

NOT ACTUALLY little TK.  I simply wrote a little doggerel for a non-entity called Tinsel Koala.  He MOST CERTAINLY has committed a felony crime - far worse than the mere efforts to usurp ownership and authority on a technology that does not belong to him.  He's EXPOSED the names and telephone numbers of people that he rifled EXCLUSIVELY from files in my computer.  And he also exposed data in my own zipped files.  And this WITHOUT LEGAL ACCESS.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 23, 2012, 04:26:30 AMI want to hear from these lawyers of yours. I have the name of the law firm, from your earlier letter to Stefan. I WILL be contacting them at the opening of business on Monday, with a letter of my own, explaining that accusing someone of a FELONY without any evidence, and THREATENING physical harm and to destroy reputations..... is a no no and will get your hand slapped.

WHAT a PRIZE IDIOT.  Feel free to write to whoever you want.  Just make sure you write under your own name.  They're not likely to answer a communication from someone who signs himself 'tinsel koala'.  In the real world that kind of signature is simply HUGELY amusing.

And I will NOT be writing to sundry colleagues of yours YET.  I'll wait until my tests are completed.  And then I'll be able to PROVE the extent of the damage that you have been attempting.  And my complaint will NOT only be to your colleagues.  It will be considerably more comprehensive.  You know what they say about the 'fat lady' that sings at the end of the show?  We're getting there.  AT LAST. 

LOL.

Rosie Pose

added