Well, as her very perceptive member volter has said...

QuoteOh. I think the problems here are not of a technical nature.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 23, 2012, 01:09:52 PM
@Sparks: when you scope the secondary output of a spark-gap TC that is properly operating, you _only_ see the pure RLC ringdown. It is one of the most beautiful sights that nature produces. There is nothing of the "generator" in the signal at all....

  Sorry for the confusion tk I was talking about the patent where he was using megahertz oscillations and inrush currents and driving high impedance motors that wouldnt even budge on a 400hz  input never mind megahertz.  I was just crediting Tesla with the first amplitude modulated electric motor drive.  Which of course could also be an am radio antennae if the translational device is a tuned antennae or device of high selfinductance and distributed capacitance whereas the highest amount of voltage is caused to reside on the big mushroom in the sky top load capacitor.  Another very important thing to not is that Tesla completely extinguished any electron motion through his spark gaps as they were used to capacitavely couple the primary oscillations with the secondary oscillations.  This pretty much prooves that electricity is not the flow of electrons.  Electricity flows outside of the conductor. How does the electricity know where the conductor is?  Cause a conductor is in the way so it goes around it.

Howdy members and guests,

Please note the statements highlighted in "RED" .......

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 23, 2012, 08:59:01 PM
Ainslie knows nothing of capacitance or capacitors. She doesn't understand them from a practical nor a theoretical standpoint. They are not accommodated by her "thesis" at all. She perhaps grasps that they are some sort of energy storage device.

.............

Your 100% correct that Rosemary ( aka witsend, aetherevarising, dooziedont ) has no clue on how a capacitor works, is made or used ..... by her own admission in this "LINK" below in her own words ..... 

Nothing has changed in Rosemary's understanding or education of anything in over a year ..... "NOTHING" shes still selling the same claimed fantasy devices with imaginary collaborators and hidden testing and evaluation or proof of operation that can be reproduced as advertised. 

It's all about the "THESIS" noting more and nothing less .....

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 20, 2011, 10:28:33 PM
http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg291932/#msg291932   Reply #1534

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 20, 2011, 05:59:59 PM
http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg291900/#msg291900   Reply #1528
@MrMag: You politely asked about Rosemary's background, and for some reason she bristled at you.

But over the years, she has revealed quite a lot. IIRC (and please correct me if I am wrong, Rosie) she has no post-secondary education, no mathematics education beyond simple algebra, certainly no calculus. Her "high school" was what we might call "alternative" here in the good old USA.

Golly.  I'm not sure that the English education system is correctly described as 'alternative'.  I think that anyone qualifying for the O levels and GCE's and M levels would be inclined to protest.  I was held back for a year as it was considered that I was just too emotionally immature to cut it so I wrote my M levels 'university entrance to SA universities' when I was 15.  I then went to university - only because I was too young to get a job. BUT when I was old enough to make my OWN decisions I LEFT UNIVERSITY.  That was after 2 years when I FINALLY turned 18.  And 1 year before my finals.  And from then until now I worked for myself - first in catering then in property development and finally in trading.  Since NONE of these endeavors included science they are also ENTIRELY irrelevant.   And since all of them require some measure of a functioning intelligence I think you can largely discount Poynt's assessment of me being an outright moron.  But since I still post here then even I'm inclined to doubt this.

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 20, 2011, 05:59:59 PM
http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg291900/#msg291900   Reply #1528
She is self-taught wrt physics in general and electronics in particular, and until she started posting here and on Energetic Forum, she had no idea what, for example, a capacitor was or what it was for.

This is also a lot of baloney.  I was VERY CAPABLY TAUGHT by the writings of Gary Zukov, Murray Gell Mann - and a list too long and too boring to include here.  AND most specifically - I was also taught by Dyson in that IMPECCABLE STUDY OF CONCEPTUAL PHYSICS.  SO.  I was taught DIRECTLY by the masters or by brilliant writers ABOUT the master - not through the fractured muddles of those who teach the MASTERS. And my lack of knowledge as it pertains to ELECTRONICS PERSISTS.  I only USE circuit components in a VERY LIMITED APPLICATION to prove my thesis.  I STILL do not know how a capacitor works.  AND I wont know until I've finally taken one apart and worked it out for myself.  I cannot be accused EVER to taking anyone's word for it on any issue at all - unless I've also UNDERSTOOD the issues.  That's the downside in being me.


..... snip .....

Yes, it's astounding. She reads three popular books on physics... The Dancing Wu Li Masters is her primary text.... and she thinks that is being directly taught by Masters.

She was an immature child the last time she sat in a classroom and was evaluated on her performance. And she couldn't handle it then, and she can't handle it now. She has absolutely no clue what is required to earn a real University degree in a hard science. And she has the utter temerity, the unmitigated gall, the overweening arrogance to presume to lecture her nonsense at people who actually HAVE been taught by real Masters, been evaluated by them directly, and found to be competent by them.

She's read a couple of popular books and thinks that's an education! Yet she cannot solve the simplest problem, the most basic exercise, given in a freshman _real_ textbook in her chosen field. Nor can she communicate effectively or use commonly understood language, or even, apparently, read and interpret a component data sheet.

And when her errors and idiocy are incontrovertibly pointed out... like the howler "equinox"... or no.... "solstice".... announcement on July 21st .... she just ignores it and sweeps it away with a flood of insult and bloviation and recycles some ancient, discredited claim as if it were suddenly true.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 24, 2012, 12:15:39 AM
people who actually HAVE been taught by real Masters, been evaluated by them directly, and found to be competent by them.

  to whom are you referring? certainly not yourself...