Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 155 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

@sparks....it's possible (I hope) that resonance allows the entrainment of energy from outside the resonant system, to increase the power in the resonator above and beyond that which is provided by the primary oscillator. I am pretty sure that the PO "feels" the load of the resonant chamber on it, but I also think that if conditions are just right, the resonant chamber might be able to allow other frequencies that might be floating around also to contribute some of their energies to the resonance at the resonant frequency. SO the energy of amplification in some resonant systems might not all be coming from the original oscillator.

Of course I have no real evidence for this belief either, other than what I know of Tesla's hopes and Helmholz resonators and etc.

TinselKoala

Would you like to refute anything I've said, in the past 300 pages, there, Webby, with checkable references, facts, or demonstrations of your own? You are welcome to do so.

Or perhaps you'd like to ask questions and expect reasonable answers, like I do in the MrWayne thread?

MileHigh

QuoteFor instance, in this para alone - you reference 'inductive reactance'.  What IS that?  In terms of our standard protocols 'reactance' is the combination of capacitance AND impedance.  Previously you referenced the resistance of the battery being responsible for the impedance in the battery  - yet a battery doesn't have any 'real' resistance.

Abandon hope and abandon ship.

picowatt

MH,

You beat me to it.

A bit more from over there:

"You are denying the significance of measurements based on arguments that I simply cannot follow.  And I am countering with arguments that are simply not acknowledged.  For instance, in this para alone - you reference 'inductive reactance'.  What IS that?  In terms of our standard protocols 'reactance' is the combination of capacitance AND impedance.  Previously you referenced the resistance of the battery being responsible for the impedance in the battery  - yet a battery doesn't have any 'real' resistance.  Therefore nor can it have impedance - nor for that matter reactance."



All you can do is shake your head and say "wow".

After ten years or so, seriously, how can it be this bad? 


PW





TinselKoala

When you believe in things you don't understand..... then you suffer.....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ul7X5js1vE