MrWayne, see3d or others:

- What made the ZED to stall after a 4 hours demonstration
and
- From where would come the potential energy that could last up to 2 days ?

Quote from: see3d on August 27, 2012, 03:58:13 PM
Hello parisd.  The importance of 48 hours under load is that Mark Dansie thought that amount of time would exhaust all possible sources of potential energy, which would prove that the ZED is a net energy producer.

@Parisd. Why did the Zed stall after four hours. We have not been told, but it could be any number of things. Remember we are talking about an experimental prototype, so things can suddenly jam, work loose, spring a leak etc. Reliability comes with time, and alpha and beta testing. Having said that, I was not there of course.


Mark Dansie`s job is, among other things, to detect fraud. So by asking for a two day run, he is eliminating
some of the obvious ways that the thing could be faked, such as hidden storage batteries, hidden compressed air tanks and so on. Two days is a period chosen more or less at random, as a balance between a realistic time period, and spending the rest of his life there. Whatever time period is chosen, there will be those who say it is not long enough.
That is my attempt to answer your questions.

Quote from: parisd on August 28, 2012, 10:57:14 AM
MrWayne, see3d or others:

- What made the ZED to stall after a 4 hours demonstration
and
- From where would come the potential energy that could last up to 2 days ?

To@,
I understand why these questions are important - but they do not reflect the topics that our advisory team is willing to discuss at this time.

Our immediate focus is to resolve the external issue we created during our last upgrade.

We will be providing clear and accurate information regarding the principle of our operation and design, and our ability to use
Gravity as a non conservative field - if this is the advice of our Validation team.

I am sorry, but the Questions that "assume entropy" of an energy source do not yet understand our system.

It is not in our best interest to engage in debates at this time.

Thank you for your interest.

Wayne Travis

Classic.

Let me translate into English:

"We are happy to tell you everything except what you actually need to know to evaluate our system. Right now we are still trying to figure out why it still won't work as predicted by my theory. If you still have questions involving thermodynamics and the fundamentals of physics as they relate to our apparatus, you are by definition too stupid to understand the answers, so please go away."

You know, I just thought of a great way MrWayne could improve his credibility, even to the point of convincing an ignorant Koala like me.

Get over to Norman, to the University of Oklahoma's College of Engineering's School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, in Felgar Hall.
http://www.ou.edu/content/coe/ame/research.html
Find some grad students looking for a thesis project and offer THEM a ten thousand dollar grant, not to make a selfpowered pump, but rather to go over MrWayne's system with a fine tooth comb, and they get the money IF and ONLY IF they can _disprove_ MrWayne's claims.

Should a highly motivated group of bright engineering students at one of the best schools in the nation FAIL at this task.... that will do much more for MrWayne's credibility than anything else that might be accomplished here.