Just to set the record straight there, RED_SUNSET.... the PMs you got from me are ALL REPLIES to emails that other people sent.

Have you ever gotten a PM from me that wasn't in that category?  IN FACT... going through my "sent" file... I save every PM that I send.... I see only one PM from me as a reply with you in the cc list, and ZERO PMs from me directly to you. It's possible that I may have deleted or forgotten to save something so... if you have a PM from me directly to you.... please feel free to post it publicly so all can see what you are complaining about.

You were included in the cc's for those emails out of courtesy, I think.... and now you want to make it seem like I am bothering you or hounding you with PMs, like some people do.

But is that really the case? 


I don't really expect an answer, just more rationalization.

Quote from: Red_Sunset on September 08, 2012, 01:42:35 AM
Gents,
Goodbye until there is a drastic change in this forum
I have nothing to gain or loose for being on this forum and I can no longer justify my time to be here
I start to be bothered by questions such as,
Why am I here ? taking time typing explanations, some philosophy ...ect,  to what purpose? when I can be spending my time on a better and more productive purpose. I think I have full-filled my obligations in context with this forum (as repayment to previous gains)

Hmm, thats pity (and I mean it), I like you insight, different angle than MrWayne and also that you took a bit of moderator role here. But if you think you should do it, then you should do it. Things said here should not be taken personally although I agree it is sometimes difficult.

Such a forum is very unefficient way to exchange information. I work in IT and have many colleagues in India. You can guess how much misunderstandings we had on both sides. Even by use of video, emails, chat and phone. And here is just chat somtimes pictures if somebody finds time to draw it. We miss a lot of non verbal comm (if not all).

respect,
Marcel

Oooops, a slip of the pen in my previous mail
Please replace,
PS; You can be firm in your beliefs so long it doesn't close (shutdown) your brain, that is when the trouble starts. I see this tooo often.

With
PS; We can be firm in our beliefs so long it doesn't close (shutdown) our brain, that is when the trouble starts. I see this tooo often.

Tinselkoala,   I have no problem with you sending me a personal mail, I just question your objective,

I didn’t do a forensic on the mail received, only the headline what said,

from:    Free Energy - Freie Energie - energia libre - OverUnity.com harti@harti.com

date:    Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:24 PM
subject:    New Personal Message: Re: trolling again in the ZED thread
mailed-by:    harti.com
:
Important mainly because of the words in the message.

You have just been sent a personal message by TinselKoala on Free Energy - Freie Energie - energia libre - OverUnity.com.

IMPORTANT: Remember, this is just a notification. Please do not reply to this email.

Quote from: webby1 on September 08, 2012, 03:16:33 AM
TK,,

Man do you ever just do or mean one thing???

PM me with your address and I will send you some of this iced via coffee, it is good.

Lets have fun with some simple stuff,, I like simple.

Charge and discharge.

Sometimes. Let's just say that lately, I am especially "tetchy" about people saying things that just aren't true, about me or my work or my behaviour on this forum.

And I don't see how it could get much simpler than the way Mondrasek is doing it; I'm not clear enough on your system yet to see if your piston is likely to be better than his elevated water in the rain gauge.

Noo, no thanks on the iced coffee. I like mine lukewarm, and grey, with kreamie.

@Red_Sunset:

Here's the header from my "sent" mailbox for the PM you are referring to. Why didn't you include the full address list? Never mind, it's a rhetorical question.

QuoteRe:  trolling again in the ZED thread  « Sent to: hartiberlin, neptune, fletcher, mondrasek, MileHigh, conradelektro, mrwayne, microcontroller, Red_Sunset, seamus103 on: September 05, 2012, 05:24:45 PM »

This was a reply to a PM sent to us all by, I believe, MileHigh.

Just as I said. You question my objective? I question yours, right back. 

I directed a couple of sentences to you directly in that PM. I was responding to some points with what I felt, and still feel, is a perfectly valid concern: the fact that you seem to "know it all" but you yourself haven't "gotten your hands wet" as far as I can tell ... but no skeptic has credibility unless they do get their hands wet, apparently. And the fact that your calculations are "too good" to be true... once the math error is corrected you have an embarrassment of overunity riches and the question becomes now....where did it all go? In other words, I think your calculations are suspect, not based on actual measurements of a real system, and not even measuring the right properties to answer the Big Question anyway.