MrWayne said,

QuoteI have also turned the page on Powercat - Calling me a liar - I did reschedule an important test - his decision to call it a lie - is a poor evaluation of events.
Missing a "personal" deadline - is not making excuses, it is not lying - I would rather put a quality product out - even if that means rescheduling - Period - page turned.
It was the right decision - and has been well worth the extra effort and time.

Is this referring to Mark Dansie's next visit? So it has been rescheduled then? Excellent. What is the new date, that it has been rescheduled to?

It's good to know that it has been rescheduled, instead of just being indefinitely postponed.

Quote from: TinselKoala on October 01, 2012, 01:08:28 PM
Your argument is bogus. What "due diligence" is needed to understand that 1) your data table does NOT list measurement number and  is incomplete, and 2) your first set of graphs has unlabeled axes, and 3) makes the claim of nonlinear relationships but shows no such thing?
If you want to pretend to be showing data in graphs, you should learn the common conventions for doing so. Unlabeled axes and incomplete data tables are no-nos. You may not be able to evaluate graphical information and data tables quickly.... that doesn't mean everyone else has the same difficulty. Some of us may have been evaluating data, graphing data and presenting it formally for many years.
And PSI and SI are not the same thing.

Irrational rant, Larry? Tell me just what part of my statement is rant, and what part is irrational. Did you label your axes in some way I can't see? Did you include the full data table? Did you illustrate your "non-linear" relationship IN ANY WAY, by graphs or data, in the first post to which I responded?
No, you did not.

To Replicators.

Could you please send me a updated picture of your Model for an update on my Web site.
I will not be posting names - just photos.
@
mr.wayne@hydroenergyrevolution.com
Thank you!

Quote from: LarryC on October 01, 2012, 02:31:21 PM

Nice argument, Larry. You have not refuted any of my points with facts, and you can't deny the truth of my comment. You did not label your graph axes, you did not include the complete data table, and none of what you presented in your first "nonlinear analysis" post showed any non-linear relationships. Only after I pointed out your deficiencies did you provide the necessary support for your claim.... and you still only managed to label one of your graph axes. Now you resort to insulting me and making further nonsensical "responses".  Why not simply refute me? You cannot, that's why.

Here, maybe this will help you with your arguments.
http://people.cst.cmich.edu/swans1bj/graph/Graph.html

Hi Everyone,

This is just a note on the sim progress.  I took a different approach last weekend.  I decided to simplify the math and do more iterations, even though it is a lot slower calculation (think very slow animations, like watching paint dry).  However, I also took an approach that let me calculate any number of layers at the same time (currently limited to 6 for no good reason).  I could not let the builders get too far ahead of me

I still have more work looking at all the edge conditions and testing different cases (and seeing if there is any way to speed it up).  However, I am not stuck inside the complicated math anymore, but moving forward with debugging operational code.   

~Dennis