Quote from: WilbyInebriated on October 04, 2012, 06:42:14 PM
understanding religious delusion
let's imagine that i tell you the following story:
...

By this tale, I see you fully understand all those otherwise called "idiots".

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on October 04, 2012, 07:43:30 PM
no you don't...
thank you AGAIN for ANOTHER tacit admission that you do not consider yourself logical, reasonable and scientific... since you have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to falsify all the other gawds humanity has created and have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to validate your gawd.

Ooo goody. Do I get another star on the satanic "admission" score chart?

Its you that does not realize that your are being 'guided' by an invisible being, and it aint pretty. 

What is it that you are saying that I admit to not being? "logical, reasonable and scientific"  Well, I see none of the above in your posts Wilb. just insults , quotes and just always angry.  Yeah, thats reasonable, logical and scientific.

MaGs

Quote from: Magluvin on October 04, 2012, 08:49:53 PM
Ooo goody. Do I get another star on the satanic "admission" score chart?

Its you that does not realize that your are being 'guided' by an invisible being, and it aint pretty. 

What is it that you are saying that I admit to not being? "logical, reasonable and scientific"  Well, I see none of the above in your posts Wilb. just insults , quotes and just always angry.  Yeah, thats reasonable, logical and scientific.

MaGs

thank you AGAIN for ANOTHER tacit admission that you do not consider yourself logical, reasonable and scientific... since you have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to falsify all the other gawds humanity has created and have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to validate your gawd.


i'll ask you again... even though i know you will respond with some asinine logical fallacy:
exactly WHAT method(s) have you used to falsify all the other gods humanity has created?

and exactly WHAT method(s) have you used to validate your godfairy other than declaring it to be so by personal fiat?

i see none of the above in ANY of your responses... just insults, non sequiturs, asinine ad hoc rationalizations and always angry. 

as an aside, it's hilarious that you jump all over rosemarie ainslie for not presenting any of her methods and yet when asked to present your methods of validating your imaginary godfairy savior/creator friend, you do the very same thing you accuse her of... how typically xian of you, you pretentious, sanctimonious hypocrite.

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on October 04, 2012, 08:54:30 PM


as an aside, it's hilarious that you jump all over rosemarie ainslie for not presenting any of her methods and yet when asked to present your methods of validating your imaginary godfairy savior/creator friend, you do the very same thing you accuse her of... how typically xian of you, you pretentious, sanctimonious hypocrite.

Hypocrite?  Ok....

As for Rose, all that is written in stone. You were there, beating on TK quite a bit over there 'with me'.  In stone. So dont twist the story. I defended her like no one has, in stone. I took a little interest in what Tk was working on and she apparently took that as bad blood and she went off on me. In stone, Tk Tar Baby thread.

Then she started insulting my inteligence and liing. I was a bit shocked. Over that week I 'saw' what TK, Poynt, and even MH have been arguing with her, that they were right.
It was she that had me stooped into believing in something that does not exist. Soo in stone. She is definitely 'disconnected' and in the 'fairy land' that you describe. Yet you dont hammer her about that, do you? Yet here, in this thread, you will have your vengeance on those that say they believe in God?  

That must mean that 'you' believe that she has a "cop>17" device, that doesnt exist.     

Hypocrite calling the hypocrite black?     In stone. 

Magzimus Leviticus

Quote from: Magluvin on October 04, 2012, 10:00:16 PM
Hypocrite?  Ok....

As for Rose, all that is written in stone. You were there, beating on TK quite a bit over there 'with me'.  In stone. So dont twist the story. I defended her like no one has, in stone. I took a little interest in what Tk was working on and she apparently took that as bad blood and she went off on me. In stone, Tk Tar Baby thread.

Then she started insulting my inteligence and liing. I was a bit shocked. Over that week I 'saw' what TK, Poynt, and even MH have been arguing with her, that they were right.
It was she that had me stooped into believing in something that does not exist. Soo in stone. She is definitely 'disconnected' and in the 'fairy land' that you describe. Yet you dont hammer her about that, do you? Yet here, in this thread, you will have your vengeance on those that say they believe in God?  

That must mean that 'you' believe that she has a "cop>17" device, that doesnt exist.     

Hypocrite calling the hypocrite black?     In stone. 

Magzimus Leviticus

more of your logical fallacies? the only point you bother to address is the 'aside'? jesus fucking christ you are so easy to manipulate... and SO predictable...  LMFAO!
YOU PATHETIC, PRETENTIOUS, SANCTIMONIOUS HYPOCRITE!

thank you AGAIN for ANOTHER tacit admission that you do not consider yourself logical, reasonable and scientific... since you have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to falsify all the other gawds humanity has created and have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to validate your gawd.


i'll ask you again... even though i know you will respond with ANOTHER asinine logical fallacy:
exactly WHAT method(s) have you used to falsify all the other gods humanity has created?

and exactly WHAT method(s) have you used to validate your godfairy other than declaring it to be so by personal fiat?

i see none of the above in ANY of your responses... just insults, non sequiturs, asinine ad hoc rationalizations and always angry.