Bruce
Thank you for taking the time to post this info .

@"W"
Please fill out the chart below ,so I will understand the methods you use to  justify your belief in overunity.

Thx
Chet
PS
If not, please explain why you come to "this" forum.

lest your  latest reply be nothing but ANOTHER red herring... 

to do this (responding with various logical fallacies) would at some level,  show you  can't hold up your end in a real debate. that would require you to actually look at the evidence and analyze it... and you know, deep down, the dangers of that; you will not do anything that jeopardizes your world view...


Addendum



"W"
Based on your "requirements"

I capitulate

The Condition being that you show how you apply the same Terms to your reasons for pursuing OU research.

Quote from: ramset on October 10, 2012, 08:31:10 AM
Bruce
Thank you for taking the time to post this info .

@"W"
Please fill out the chart below ,so I will understand the methods you use to  justify your belief in overunity.

Thx
Chet
PS
If not, please explain why you come to "this" forum.

i asked you first... and thus your latest reply is nothing but ANOTHER red herring... 
you do this (responding with various logical fallacies) because at some level, you know that you can't hold up your end in a real debate. that would require you to actually look at the evidence and analyze it... and you know, deep down, the dangers of that; you will not do anything that jeopardizes your world view...


but... thank you AGAIN for ANOTHER tacit admission that you do not consider yourself logical, reasonable and scientific... since you have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to falsify all the other gawds humanity has created and have repeatedly refused to present the methods you used to validate your gawd...  or your imaginary demonfairy.

i requested this of you 33 pages ago... that's THIRTY THREE PAGES AGO and you have evaded and avoided answering since then. god sees what you are doing ramsatan... and he is not pleased.

Quote from: WilbyInebriated on September 16, 2012, 05:20:45 PM
chetty, vinreet, tito the clown or any other of you faithers that consider yourself logical, reasonable and scientific... please present the methods you used to falsify all the other gawds humanity has created and then present the methods you used to validate your gawd. i would like to compare and contrast as well as offer peer review.

thank you for your cooperation.



nota bene: failure or refusal to present said methods will constitute another tacit admission that you have neither extant material evidence nor a logical proof for the existence of your imaginary godfairy savior friend.

Quote from: Bruce_TPU on October 10, 2012, 08:12:27 AM

The PROPHECIES of the Bible have either come to pass, (past tense), are in the process of coming to pass (present tense) or will come to pass (future tense).  There are SO MANY prophecies in the Bible but here are a few to wet your appetite.  These are "past tense" prophecies, having already seen their fulfillment.  And unlike Nostradamus, Edgar Cayce, etc, ALL bible prophecies are ACCURATE 100% of the TIME!  HA! Evidence... We are just getting warmed up!!!

Are you serious?  You are using one book of fiction as evidence for the prophecies of another.  This would be like claiming Harry Potter is real because things that were predicted in Book 1 occurred in Book 2.


But as long as you are looking up things, why don't you look up contradictions in the Bible.  It's also a very long list.


But at the end of the day, do you really believe that stupid story about Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden and that talking snake?  And because of this we are all sinners, every last one of us, and some guy has to be tortured to death on a cross to make up for Eve eating the damn apple.  And what is so wrong about knowing good from evil?  Aren't we supposed to know what is right and what is wrong?  This is the original sin?  How weak.  This is just a fairy tale, and not a very good one.

"W"
Based on your "requirements"

I capitulate

The Condition being that you show how you apply the same Terms to your reasons for pursueing OU research.

Thx
Chet
Ps
Top of page.