Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

Started by mrwayne, April 10, 2011, 04:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 190 Guests are viewing this topic.

DreamThinkBuild

Hi Fletcher,

QuoteWork using only gravity force as the Prime Mover would have to have the ability to create on demand asymmetric forces that in turn produced torque.

You are right on the money. The mass can be used to asymmetrically self re-gauge itself especially in a geodesic fall. 3 axis lever.

wildew

Quote from: neptune on October 15, 2012, 07:49:15 AM
Love the weights under the bench idea. Its one of those ideas that is so simple- but only after someone[you] has thought of it.

Thanks Neptune - necessity is the ...  ;D
One feature I just realized I forgot - and will add tonight - Mond's bottom stop.
In a way I wish the blocks and 2x6 block were fastened to the top of the riser so I could limit its travel but I will add a stop under that bottom cross member. Then when I add the 16Lb weight I will see the "pre-charge" happen because of incoming water instead of being caused by adding the weight.

@Fletcher - I like your analysis method - comparing and calculating the outer riser height.
I'll try to get some numbers to plug in to that methodology.

Merging that comment by Fletcher and the hydraulic comparison reminder posted by Webby might be interesting.

Dale

DreamThinkBuild

Hi Seamus,

I will explain simply.

A heavy ball in a open cylinder.

A shaft stuck through the middle of the cylinder so that it is precessed. (first lever)

A heavy ball on an incline does what?

A heavy mass pushing a long lever arm does what? (2nd lever)

The torque from the lever arm with a beam at 90 degrees can make a virtual wedge lifting cylinder behind the heavy ball creating an incline with a wheel.

A beam at -90 degrees from the lever arm can create a counterbalance or fall in front (by dropping the cylinder) of the heavy mass. (3rd lever)

The ball has only one direction to go to re-gauge itself.

DreamThinkBuild

Hi Seamus,

I just started this project and this is my third printed cylinder. From my experiments it take very little energy to push the lever with the weight aiding. Like all gravity devices I need to build bigger more mass. So far my designs have been iterative I've been fixing issues as I come across them. I can tell you why this 3rd version will not work and working on a 4th larger version so I can get a 2" sphere with a lighter weight printed lever, but I am open to your thoughts on why it won't work and if so do you see a way to use this leveraged fall to aid a motor?

DreamThinkBuild

Hi Seamus,

I appreciate your input.

I don't understand what you mean by bottom though. The ball and lever portion are on the slope due the counterbalance and wedge behind it. The bottom where the rim of the precessed cylinder is contacting the ground is about a quarter of the way from lever arm between the counterbalance. In other words the lever and ball are always on a slope with the true bottom being slightly in front of the lever.

This is where I'm not understanding, logically you would think two objects on a slope would want to seek lowest point especially when a heavier object is behind it. The bottom is always being pushed ahead on the rim of the cylinder ahead of the lever and weight.