Quote from: LarryC on October 22, 2012, 12:37:26 PM
Check it Out!
http://www.mrwaynesbrain.com/index.php/current-objectives

Regards, Larry

Looking very carefully, checking it out.... .I see a lot of claims but no data or evidence supporting the claims at all. I see a rebranding, some talk about a spinning or rotary system, some talk of data gathering.... but not even a claim of a continuous running device. Just a hope to "presume" running tomorrow. Jam yesterday, jam tomorrow.....

Larry, all I have ever asked for is DATA TO SUPPORT THE CLAIMS BEING MADE. That is, some proof, some evidence, that actually indicates that MrWayne has what he claims. Data like that Mondrasek provides. Data from real systems. Data that support the claim that he has a "simple three layer system that is clearly overunity by itself" (his exact words). But what has been provided is sorely lacking. It has been amusing watching you learn how to present your data in a manner that actually communicates something.... you are not quite there yet.
We've seen no photos from these independent replicators, no data, nothing but claims..... and still no firm date for Mark Dansie's visit, and still no self-runner. Just some more references to God and the Bible.... which I find totally amazing. Typical but amazing.
What we have seen is believers making attacks on skeptics like me, exemplified by the quotation Red_Sunset chose to post. No refutations of our points, no arguments about substance, no provision of any support for their claims, but simple ad hominem abuse, while at the same time accusing us, falsely, of the same thing.

Now.... getting back to something we can actually check: Does your sim reproduce or predict Mondrasek's accurate results properly? If it doesn't..... well, there is something wrong somewhere. Wouldn't you agree? And it's pretty hard to argue with results as precise and consistent as Mondrasek's.

Quote from: TinselKoala on October 22, 2012, 01:20:34 PM
......................................What we have seen is believers making attacks on skeptics like me, exemplified by the quotation Red_Sunset chose to post. No refutations of our points, no arguments about substance, no provision of any support for their claims, but simple ad hominem abuse, while at the same time accusing us, falsely, of the same thing.
......................................

Peace Bro ! Please do not shoot the messenger, 
I only showed you something, you knew already that it was out there. I can not see why you get so hyped up on it. You must have stepped on someone's feet to get that write-up. I agree that the content is bullshit with no meaning to actuality but it does underlines the feelings certain people have towards you. Pretty similar to the reputation you acquired here in this topic subject.  It is not always what was said but how it was said what is destructive.
The data you are looking for is will not help you without understanding the device. Once you understand the device, the data is secondary. The data is only primary to the efficiency, this changes with the device type and physical properties.
Good to hear the good news on the replication , do not force your way in, only diligence will work.
Regards.

Strange enough? The questions are there, but the answers are missing!

At the bottom of this page: http://www.mrwaynesbrain.com/index.php/our-system-explained

Do you have a working model?
What is the best run time on record?
Doe the ZED Produce usable power?

The answers to the other questions are lacking substance, only promisses and waffle.

Greetings, Conrad

@Red:

Just imagine how easy it would be to embarrass me, shut me up, make me eat crow or humble pie or whatever your favorite metaphor might be. All that needs to be done is for someone of these people to "show the sausages"... that is, to produce unequivocal evidence that their claims are true. Not Mylow, not Archer Quinn, not "TheBuzz" who I believe wrote the passage you quoted, not Rosemary Ainslie, not Steorn..... and as of yet, not Mister Wayne..... none of them have performed the simple act that would have me eating my Stetson and publicly apologising on YouTube, just before vanishing into history. Not one!
Instead, they choose to insult me, complain about my personal style, seek to have me banned by secret communications with the site owner, post lies and libels about me, or even about people they only _think_ are me..... but they never refute me. Why not?

One would be tempted to draw a certain conclusion from this, don't you think? And I'm not talking about concluding that I am not a nice person, or a DUMB ASS, or a misogynistic homosexual, or a pagan hippie. I am talking about them trying to support their claims and demonstrate their veracity. The conclusion is that they cannot, and that they don't, in fact, have what they claim.

Quote from: TinselKoala on October 22, 2012, 03:57:38 PM
@Red:

Just imagine how easy it would be to embarrass me, shut me up, make me eat crow or humble pie or whatever your favorite metaphor might be. All that needs to be done is for someone of these people to "show the sausages"... that is, to produce unequivocal evidence that their claims are true. Not Mylow, not Archer Quinn, not "TheBuzz" who I believe wrote the passage you quoted, not Rosemary Ainslie, not Steorn..... and as of yet, not Mister Wayne..... none of them have performed the simple act that would have me eating my Stetson and publicly apologising on YouTube, just before vanishing into history. Not one!
Instead, they choose to insult me, complain about my personal style, seek to have me banned by secret communications with the site owner, post lies and libels about me, or even about people they only _think_ are me..... but they never refute me. Why not?

One would be tempted to draw a certain conclusion from this, don't you think? And I'm not talking about concluding that I am not a nice person, or a DUMB ASS, or a misogynistic homosexual, or a pagan hippie. I am talking about them trying to support their claims and demonstrate their veracity. The conclusion is that they cannot, and that they don't, in fact, have what they claim.

Tinsel,
Your point is well made and taken,  I am confident that within the not so distant future the claims will be proven in a way that will satisfy the needs of you & all.
Regards,