Quote from: MileHigh on October 28, 2012, 10:18:06 AM
e2matrix, I am not sure if you have the scientific background to read between the lines on the technical aspects of the things you see around here.  Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe you said that you have been following this kind of stuff for 20 years.  Your type is the type that wants to believe first and ask questions later.

I wouldn't word it quite that way.  I am the type that believes someone is innocent until proven guilty.  The type that assumes someone is honest until proven dishonest.  And the type that assumes someone has some real valid device until proven it is not.  To assume otherwise is to risk crushing the life out of someone who already has a big uphill battle in proving a new concept or disproving a long accepted law or theory.  If it is not a valid concept it will fail on it's own without a bunch of people here making it more difficult for someone on this already nearly impossible path.   

QuoteI have read the recent posts by Philip and followed some of the links and I have to agree with Qwert.  I noticed that his references to the electrical characteristics of the device indicate that he is an amateur.  That doesn't jive if you are supposed to be the one developing this technology.  A geophysicist may only have the most rudimentary understanding of electronics from one or two first year courses.

The other issue that struck me was one of the proposals for rolling out a first product - free energy batteries for hearing aids.  Here is where a lot of people don't have the "vision thing."  Can you imagine a domestic scene at home where the husband is reading the daily paper and says, "Look honey, there is an article about a company that is selling batteries for hearing aids that never need replacing?"  Do you think that's real?  Just another innovative product like a 5G cell phone?

If this was real then it would be the biggest news story of the 21st century and every news site would have it plastered on the front page.  The world would change overnight, it would be the most shocking thing the world has ever seen.  And you guys had a discussion about the first killer application, hearing aid batteries, in all seriousness.  More importantly, Philip talked about it in all seriousness.

Milehigh,  Your reputation as a non-believer and basher of almost everything precedes you.  You were almost banned at the   liberal OverunityResearch.com forum because people were tired of all the negativity.   I don't know if you are just a born skeptic of everything or whether you are paid to do this or if you have just chosen 'save us all from our foolishness' - LOL.   But I'll just leave it at we will likely never agree.   I could readily argue your statements above but I'll not waste my time on it because I've seen the arguments go on endlessly with you in other threads and other forums. 
I completely understand his reasoning for getting something small started as a validation of his device but as I said I won't argue that or anything else.   I will add I don't really know what degrees Philip has but just based on his post above it would seem he has an extensive knowledge of physics and of testing procedures needed to validate this.  I've had college physics and electronics and a Ham radio license but I am far from being an electrical engineer or physicist.   However it was stated in that article I pointed to that Philip was also an electrical engineer.   So disbelieve what ever you want - it's your right   

Google "what is / who is a physicist" or "physicist definition" or something like that. According to one, since I'm just studying it, I am a physicist despite that I don't understand a word in a professional handbook: 'A physicist is someone who studies or completes research into physics'. ( http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-physicist.htm )
But according to another statement of the same link, I'm not: 'There are three items required to become a physicist: post-secondary education, graduate studies, and working experiences as a physicist.'
I don't consider "a physicist", "a scientist" a guy who expresses his anger when his work is challenged and who expects applause only. If I tell you that I am God, will you believe me? You should, b'coz I told so... 

e2matrix, there is no need to play the MIB card all the time.  Words posted on a forum cannot stop someone from advancing their project.

I am just telling you the truth as I see it and I have 30+ years worth of experience in electronics to draw on to help me form my impressions and opinions.  As a general comment, you would be wise to factor in the advice and suggestions from people that have more experience in something that you don't have experience in.

You are free to disbelieve myself and Qwert.  If this story ends up not panning out, perhaps you could acknowledge that myself and Qwert were on the right track.

Finally, no takers to explain why the $10 TV tube experiment overturns the 2nd LoT?  I personally don't see that happening at all.

@milehigh
@Qwert

This is for alternative sources of energy, philip give us a simple test. Do you have something to say about this test?.

If you dont have anything to say about science, please go away, dont waste our time.   And all your negative talk, will return to you, in multiple ways!

@everyone
This next week I will try to make the test of philip, but i just can find used "not new" pentode in my country.  I will talk about my results.

The love of the eternal God be with everybody.

Elisha:

I have have said something about the test with the pentode.  There is a claim that it violates the 2nd LoT.  So I am asking for the explanation from anyone as to precisely how and why it violates the law.  From my perspective the law is not being violated.  It's very dangerous to not question things that you are told.  So, can anyone respond to my questions?  Remember, it's not me that is making the claim.

No one in the thread has challenged the notion that the pentode tube test violated the 2nd LoT except me.  That implies that most or all of you accept what you are being told, but can anyone explain why?

I do indeed have some things to say about science and I ask you to respect the ideas of freedom of speech and plurality of opinion.  Those ideas are more important than your desire to silence myself and Qwert.

MileHigh