Hi All,


I am making a special posting here today to explain the changes to the Quenco long term strategy.


First a quick update on the technical issues.


I am pleased to announce that the biggest hurdle to manufacture has been solved, I cannot reveal the details because that is subject to a new patent application, what I can tell you is that the change means fabrication is now no longer exotic and difficult, and yields can now be guaranteed to be near 100%. Of course we are a long way from being able to do 1000 layer devices.


Now the changes to Quenco strategy, some time ago a lot of people here gave me their thoughts and they made sense to the point that I increased the royalty to $100 per cm2, I am no longer comfortable with that level and so I have reduced it back to my earlier pricing. It does mean a substantial drop to the foundation but in the end the needs of the environment and all the people come first. Early adoption of technology is very important and so the barriers must be kept low, even the licence fees are reduced to get the thing going asap.


The charitable foundation will have as its prime goal to produce quenco for the poor and the foundation will have a licence such that the income it receives can be efficiently applied to produce massive amounts of free quenco for those unable to afford it. Clearly this means production of billions of cm2 for the 3rd World.


It is my view that this is the best strategy.


As to the removal of the challenge, firstly there was not a single taker despite it generating an amazing amount of hits, secondly the feedback was hostile and nasty. Thirdly, and most importantly, it probably was just me being a bit childish and naive, the fact is the best proof is a fully operational quenco. So I am simplifying and focussing on that, and that alone.


Phil

More great news!   Thanks again for the updates.   Sorry to hear this didn't bring in big business interests yet but I suspect it's so far above what most people can believe that until some sort of device is "in their face and hands" and see a working unit that interest may be a bit slack.   You show both great knowledge and high Integrity Philip.   I am always left with a good feeling in reading your updates.     In case others haven't looked lately at the web site here's something for you from quentron.com:

                              "   The only acceptable proof of such a device is a working device

                                                                         So be here

                                                                    OFFICIAL LAUNCH
                                                                    30 November 2012
                                                                    6pm (p.s.t) "

@Phil

That's the ticket, are the colonies civilised enough to sell Watneys and pork pies yet and do they have PG tips?

It really is very laudable, good intention of Philip, desire that this development comes quickly to those in need. And encourage her friends and colleagues in this great challenge, the generator thermionic, which has taken so many years.

But we must be realistic, Quenco price will be high for the first to use it, regardless of the price of the license, because although you can make a high production, demand, will be much more large, therefore the price to the consumer will be high.  Therefore if the license is cheap, what will happen is that the manufacturer  and intermediaries  they will remain with much of the gain, and Philip will have minimal income compared with manufacturers, being philip, the most time and money has risked in this invention.

We propose the following.
Limit 100 licenses.
$ 10 royalty per cm2.
$ 10M Application fee per license.
$ 10M Annual renewal fee.

This is the reasoning:
The companies that will be asking Quenco licenses, and they will mass produce, are Intel, Samsung, TSMC, Global Foundries, Samsung, Micron, Toshiba, etc.. These companies are accustomed to pay hundreds of millions of dollars for licenses, semiconductor, ie $ 1 million is nothing for these companies, lawyers may charge more money to write a contract of these characteristics, more that what it costs the license. For example, Intel paid this year 2.3 billion dollars for a stake of 10% in a company of semiconductor wafer fabrication.

If philip, want to help a friend, to facilitate the entry, production, Quenco because philip can directly give the discount, you want.

For the foundation proposed by philip, its purpose it should be bring solutions for the production of food, housing, water and electricity.  At cost and long-term financed. The poor do not need, Quenco and they will not know how to use it, they need solutions that work with Quenco. What could happen is that unscrupulous brokers would use these free Quenco,  making profit of the needs of the poor.

The solution to the problems of the people, is not give anything for free, because that's filled with shame, and takes away the possibility of earning their own living, and to develop themselves as individuals and as a society . What we you have to do is provide all the tools and conditions for they can have a decent life, not charging interest, giving them time and work, so they can afford what they really need.

An individual without dignity, is dependent of what you always give to him. This being the opposite of the result sought.

Note: Again we do the pentode experiment, and this reached a maximum of 3.9 micro ampere, just before melting. (Much more, than 0.3 micro ampere in previous test).

Elisha:

QuoteNote: Again we do the pentode experiment, and this reached a maximum of 3.9 micro ampere, just before melting. (Much more, than 0.3 micro ampere in previous test).

I hate to say this, but it's time for everybody in this thread to get real.  People that want to believe in free energy cannot simply close their eyes to the truth.

Seamus103 already stated it in posting #339 but you did not want to acknowledge it and no one else did either.  Your experimental setup is clearly not an isothermal setup, it's a toaster oven!  A toaster oven can't even make evenly browned toast.  The heating element cycles on and off according to the setting of the thermostat.  That does not product a constant temperature, that produces a variable temperature.  In addition, the parts of the pentode tube that are closer to the heating element will be hotter than the parts of the pentode tube that are farther away from the heating element.

Unfortunately you haven't replicated anything.  That is the truth and if it's upsetting to you, channel your frustration in a positive way.  Try to make a better experimental apparatus.  A toaster oven will simply not work, sorry.

The truth is without any specialized equipment, the chances are very slim that you will be able to make an isothermal oven.

MileHigh