Check out my posting #3053 if you haven't read it.  I have a feeling it got lost in the shuffle.  Tick-tock!

Hi,
  well done Tinsel,most enjoyable and keep at it! I trust Mr. Wayne will include a safety valve in his high pressure line and an over speed
limiter some where in the design.
   Remember what happened to Joseph Papp, a doubter unplugged the power cord, the engine over-sped and blew up killing a man.
Also remember John Searle, his machine over-sped and lifted off in to space. He's been trying for 50 years to re-create it and he
hasn't managed it yet.
                                      John.

Mr Red Herring, do you think they will ever be a point in time where you (might) admit Wayne's device doesn't work ?
will it be next week next month or next year ?  I get the feeling you really don't care as long as wayn keep saying
his device works you will continue to believe blindly despite the lack of real world evidence.(Not logical evidence)

There has been no verification......Wayne continues to lie.....looking like it will never happen now,
and if the team ever make it their the chances are they will be more excuses why they can't complete
ther tests properly.

There have been no successful replications showing clear over unity....despite you telling everyone
repeatedly that the information is easy to find, (it's so easy you have written a book for dummies)

As for proper Scientific Data that can be analysed correctly Wayne has stated that he will not release
this information.......hmmmm sounds like he's covering himself if any investors taken him to court.

One of the most interesting things is that it now looks like Wayne seriously under estimated the level
of experience on this forum when it comes to people makeing claims of OU,
his recent post today seemed like a very poor attempt at damage limitation (investors in mind)

Of course Wayne could change all this with proper evidence and verification instead of never ending promising words.

BTW good to see MileHigh is posting live again.

Quote from: MileHigh on November 11, 2012, 05:21:50 PM
Check out my posting #3053 if you haven't read it.  I have a feeling it got lost in the shuffle.  Tick-tock!

http://www.overunity.com/10596/hydro-differential-pressure-exchange-over-unity-system/msg343563/#msg343563

Quote from: TinselKoala on November 11, 2012, 12:46:10 PM
Consider this simplification. You simply have a solid riser of your dimensions, and a tub of water the dimensions of the outer retainer wall. This tub is filled to the level of 36 inches. Now you lower your solid riser into the tub. The outer water level comes up, and overflows, but that doesn't matter; as long as the resultant level in the outer wall chamber is 72 inches, you've displaced your "virtual water" and you have that full buoyancy force available, and it is 0.0361 pounds per cubic inch x 793.926 square inches x 36 inches = 1031.78 pounds of buoyant force. But your riser isn't solid and it has air pressure pushing it up inside. This adds 1920.27 pounds to the upward force experienced by the riser. But the non-solid riser doesn't displace the full 36 inches of water any more, it only displaces 34 inches, as some of the water goes up inside the riser and doesn't contribute to buoyancy -- it's not displaced. This brings the buoyant force down to 974.46 pounds, for a total lift force of about 2895 pounds, in broad agreement with your total lift value of 2839. The difference between what you got for your total, and what I got for my total, is accounted for by rounding errors and the estimate of 34 inches displaced.
Taking your "hydraulic lift force" value as calculated at 2716.65 and comparing it to the total force upwards experienced by the riser that I calculated, you do indeed appear to have a slight advantage of force ... less than ten percent. (2895/2717 = 1.065)
Note that I didn't even have to include any reference to a "pod" in my calculations, except by reference to your psi air pressure values.
But.... and this is the real question.... over what distance does that force advantage act?

At first I thought you were not serious with your claims, but seeing your post, apparently you are.

I made a drawing of your setup.

Your calculations on the Riser can be Archimedes or differential or PSI X SI, not more than one and only actual water levels can be used, no combinations of actual water and virtual water.

Larry