Quote from: Gianna on February 26, 2013, 03:59:49 AM
snip..
You say burning up, but in fact it is an 'explosion' as the heat given off gives rise to a supersonic shockwave, but I won't argue the point

Indeed, the velocity of the meteorite entering the atmosphere would be upwards of 50,000 kph (and that's a really slow one!) Faster than the space shuttles average re-entry speed of 30,000 kph. Anything, including the space shuttle will create a massive sonic boom upon entering the atmosphere at those speeds. Yet the sonic boom will still be much slower than the metorite (or the shuttle), so long delays in hearing  its flight shockwave and / or its explosion shockwave when it blew apart, would be expected at ground level.

It's easy to see how a kiloton or more of energy would be released when a large meteorite blows apart in the air. Thank goodness it did, because there would have been much more energy released if it had hit the ground while still in one large piece.

Cheers

  As we have not heard from observatories stating that they have previously followed the path of this meteor, before it entered the atmosphere, and have not mentioned anything related to it, at least that I are aware of.  Maybe they have...but, did not warn people about it.
  It may not have even been a meteor, as you mentioned it did not produce the expected extreme sonic boom, but several small booms, instead.
But, no warnings from the big eye in the sky.
  We can see from obserations of our moon, as well as other planets, that big meteors have impacted its surface and left huge craters. Which implies that they did not totally break apart on entry. Even though there is not supposed to be an atmosphere on the moon, which can't be disproved, either. As there may be an atmosphere of some sort, as well as on Mars, and other planets.
  NASA states that they have not been back to the moon in over 40 years. Is this to be believed. Possibly other space crafts from our planet have, and more...
  Although this is all speculation, it all seams very odd to me.
 

Quote from: Gianna on February 26, 2013, 03:59:49 AM

OK...
look at these videos and gauge the height.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4N_FpEcxk4 , at 0:04 seconds.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0yCBuiOVS4  at 0:31 seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sl_RknL9G-Q at 0:18 seconds

Sorry but none of these videos of the very same event can support the meteor burning up as low as 1000 - 500 meters. This makes the rest of your theory unable to be supported by the evidence.

(You say burning up, but in fact it is an 'explosion' as the heat given off gives rise to a supersonic shockwave, but I won't argue the point)

These are all examples where they used wide camera angle lenses, so these distort the real view and make it look more high... and the first video was probably from a different piece of the trail and from much further away, maybe the next city,
as the trail was much shorter and much more far away and it was filmed almost with a fish eye lens, so big optical distortion...

Quote from: Gianna on February 26, 2013, 04:29:50 AM


As to the results of air quality sampling I won't comment until I have researched it more, but the evidence presented so far is not conclusive of anything other than atmospheric pollution from any source.

Yes, study them !

They document the metal ions and other stuff found in rainwater from the chemtrails.

Have a look at this video to see the difference between contrails and chemtrails


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6q8H6ASKgM

  Forget the crowbar, jackhammer, or any other means to open your eyes, you've made your point.