Magluvin:

One more time you are doing it again, making a Strawman argument.

The points I made are valid points.

You said:

QuoteHe really is hell bent when it comes to people talking about or using this coil.  He claims its a waste of time and he is trying to save us from that.

There is no connection between me trying to clear up misconceptions so people can learn from that and your gratuitous negative spin on what I was saying.

In addition, you can quote me but you can't make a technical argument against me.  Most notably, nor can you suggest an application for the self-resonating coils in this patent.

All that we are left with is that you can't refute that what I say is true, your frustration because you can't suggest a single application for these coils, and your pretentious preening.

MileHigh

@Milehigh,

                   These coils act as "Impulse Magnetizer Coils". That's a single application. Tesla's Scrap Yard Magnet was made obsolete by the transistor. The one I looked into was an antique back in the 70's.

                     Take a look at the Cook Battery. Two reciprocating Impulse Magnetization events. Enough power to drive a freight train off Cook's nearly 3' long magnetic cores. This is a real effect. Look at Cook's circuit schematic for the two SBC's in series!

Quote from: MileHigh on May 26, 2013, 03:05:06 PM
Magluvin:

One more time you are doing it again, making a Strawman argument.

The points I made are valid points.

What I have noticed and 'taken note of' is your propensity to argue, attack and ridicule those that post things about this coil. You did it in the 'Confirming delayed lenz'  you did it in the thread about Zeropoint132's self running bifi thread, and you are doing it here. You seem to be greatly magnetized to the subject, and will fill page after page with what you want others to think and believe about these coils, Tesla of which you claim he wasnt that great. As with Tesla, you are in a minority of those that know of him. If it were up to you, there would be a web site called Teslawasabum.com.

I suppose to you, Edison and Marcony did it all right? Tesla was a bum. Tesla was an average Joe wire man. You imply that in recent posts here.  Basically you imply that he was nobody special. 

Tesla could out smart you with what he had in his little finger compared to your complete postings on the internet.

You have something against people messing around with this coil, this is for certain. You use degrading wording as much as you can of it and the people that post about it.

I can only hope that people can see this clearly and it empowers them to persue more experimentation. Being that there is 'soo much' implied negativity towards the experimentation with these coils, there must be something to it. You attack the idea of a bifi coil like an atheist to a Christian.  Something is up with that.


Mags

@Mags,

         He's an extrodinary Gadfly, pehaps afflicted with a Freudian fetish. We need to Arduino the Cook battery. The relationship is atomic COP!

Magluvin,

Right, I look at certain things and make some technical points that are valid and have merit.  Then you attempt to spin that into a Strawman argument about combative arguing, attacking and ridiculing.  You are frustrated when sometimes there is no logical reason or any valid data to back up your "free energy buzz."

And you even go so far as to use a Strawman argument that I have something against people experimenting when what I am really doing is giving them a sensible viewpoint that they may have not heard before.  I do that for their benefit.

But the glass is always half empty and cloudy and dark from your perspective and that dulls your free energy buzz and you are not happy so you try to pull off this silly stunt.

I think that people might be seeing through you and your motivations and I encourage them to do as much experimentation as they want.  Occasionally I get emails from people that thank me for my comments.

MileHigh