It's amazing what one finds while going through those old threads for background on the Quantum-17 fiasco.

For example, I finally found some _completely accurate_  waveform data shown by Err-on on the borrowed Tek DPSO TDS3054C.
Data that even I cannot argue with, data that is impeccably gathered and expertly displayed:

http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-79.html#post66590

Guys... .here's the TRUTH.

QuoteGuys - here's the TRUTH.  There are hand picked 'trolls' who move through the forums - with the sole mandate to discredit over unity claims.  Let me name some of them.  Obviously 'leading the pack' is our 'ickle pickle' aka Tinsel Koala.  He is paid per video 'seen' which is why he's so anxious to have people view his work.

That is an utter and abject LIE in the words of Rosemary Ainslie. I have never accepted or solicited a single penny from any of my videos and they are not even supported by ads. For Ainslie to assert this utter nonsense is extremely offensive to me, and the reason for that should be obvious to anyone who knows me... and many do.

QuoteHis license to 'kill' is absolute - and includes the right to destroy reputations, work, livelihoods, reputations - of ANYONE HE SEES FIT as he is ENTIRELY exempt from all accountability.  He works at this denial 24/7 and has dedicated these many years to denying our claims.  Sadly - precisely because he's rather excessively and emotionally engaged - he's also lost any reasonable judgement.

An absolute license to "kill"? Oh, really? Who issued me this absolute licence to kill? Whose reputation, livelihood, work, have I destroyed? Mylow's? YOURS?
And yet EVERY SINGLE THING I have maintained about Ainslie and her three-ring circus of circuitry has been proven to be true over and over, from the June 2009 finding of the false schematic in the Quantum paper, the fabricated data and false claims in the 5-transistor device,  on to the present. My judgement is perfectly clear on this: Ainslie has lied, insulted, misrepresented, distorted, fabricated data and gotten others to lie for her, over and over again, and the proofs are in these pages, as I have presented many times over.

QuoteHe's acted very much like Savonarola who managed to frustrate the Renaissance flowering away from the Catholic Church - through a witch hunt that effectively destroyed thousands of samples of great art works.  Including those of Botticelli who is, unquestionably - one of the greatest of that movement.  Anyway - that aside.  Like Savonarola - TK is personally driven by a deep seated hatred of women in general and me in particular.

Another utter and abject LIE, along with a characterization that is positively ACTIONABLE, to use her comical language. It is posts like this from her that absolutely immunize me from any possible threats from her imaginary lawyers. All I need do is show them the images of Ainslie's lying and insulting posts like this one.
I challenge Ainslie to provide any evidence AT ALL that I am misogynistic or any of the other claims she has just libellously made. She cannot.

QuoteAnd he CANNOT tolerate those who are capable of original thought - precisely because he, himself, is incapable of this.  His knowledge of physics is sadly bereft.

My knowledge of physics can be compared to Ainslie's at any moment at any time. Let's take a high-school physics test together, shall we? I laugh at you, ignorant troll Ainslie, who says "A Joule is a Watt, the terms are interchangeable" and who has no calculus, no geometry, no math at all beyond punching calculator keys.

QuoteHis talents at electronics more than compensate.  He has certainly mastered the art of spin - and uses this to good effect to frustrate any advancement in the quest for over unity.  That he is champion to the cause is endorsed by Mark Dansie who pays tribute to TK's contributions here.  They're all rather proud of his efforts - a pride that is only equaled - if not SURPASSED - by the extraordinary pride of TK himself.  Vainglorious does not cut it.  TK compliments himself with an assiduity that is unequaled and largely based on his absurd and alleged GRE count - whatever that is.

Some people do know what that is, and respect it. People who sit on graduate school admission committees, for example. People who genuinely do dispense "Bursaries" as you call them. Even silly groups like MENSA know what those letters and numbers mean, and you are damn right, I am proud of them and I have every right to be. And every time Ainslie mentions them in the derogatory fashion she does, she betrays her own disrespect and ignorance, and inability to perform up to any real standard on her own.

Furthermore, all of my work is fully documented in my YouTube "lab notes" and ALL OF IT is fully repeatable. There is no "SPIN", no "MISDIRECTION" as Harvey falsely accused me of many times-- before he even built the circuit or saw the light himself. If I make an error I admit it and correct it ASAP. Anyone can repeat my work and see for themselves that I refute you at every step of the way. You do realize, don't you, that the old Energetic Forum threads are still available.

As far as arrogant pride goes, Ainslie: you are the champion Dunning-Kruger example, with no skills, no talent, and no ability to do anything for yourself-- except sling insults. You cannot refute me, so you resort to your laughable attempts to discredit me. But you are proven wrong at every attempt.

QuoteHis rather whacky emotional instability is based on a misogyny that also inclines him to homosexuality. He is uncluttered by 'high principle' and is highly effective as is any criminal sociopath - in this his quest to deny over unity.

Preserved for the record. Ainslie has here called me several things: Emotionally unstable, whacky, misogynistic and "inclined to homosexuality". She has insulted my principles and is calling me a criminal sociopath.... because I have exposed the TRUTH behind her and her insane claims.

At this point, Ainslie, Queen of Trolls... you should be very happy that you do not use my real name. Your imaginary lawyers CERTAINLY are.

Meanwhile, back in "reality".....

@Poynt99: Still having trouble locating waveforms? Here's Aaron's replication of Glen's "replication" of the Quantum circuit. Of course, this means Glen's where the mosfet gets much hotter than the load....

Note that he is NOT using the Quantum 555 circuit, he is NOT using the Quantum duty cycle, he is NOT using the Quantum frequency... he is NOT even showing oscillations....
Yet everyone is crowing about Glen "he has done it!"

SO maybe THESE are the operating parameters to use.


Note the blue Drain signal: is the mosfet ON during the spike, ROSEMARY AINSLIE... or it it OFF? Just what duty cycle of the mosfet ON time is being shown here? I know the answer, poynt99 knows the answer... DO YOU, AINSLIE?

What is the mosfet ON duty cycle percentage in this scopeshot? Not the gate signal, the actual mosfet ON percentage.
What is the frequency of the blue spikes?
Can Ainslie even answer these questions, without consulting her "experts"? I doubt it seriously.

WHERE IS ANY EVIDENCE OF OSCILLATIONS, random aperiodic or otherwise? Other than the natural inductive rings visible due to the factors already amply discussed, there is no evidence of any magic oscillations. There will however be _plenty_ of heat seen in the load resistor, and the mosfet itself, using this waveform.


http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-98.html#post70225
post 2917

This is like the bloody Siege of Leningrad.

Look at this nonsense, "Here we have a poster who is inclined to 'self medicate' and to do so to excess."

It's like making allegations out of thin air just like you can do the "poly-Quantum" circuit, pick your variation, and observe the pulsing inductor create free energy from superluminal nothingness.

Rosie, I think that you have been eating too much wallpaper glue and it's affecting your brain.  (But we are the good guys, I just couldn't resist the line!)

It is astounding, isn't it? On the one hand she squawks,

QuoteCan I impose on you to be SPECIFIC.  Where exactly has my behaviour NOT been SCIENTIFIC - HONEST - DEFENSIBLE - NOR ADMIRABLE... AT ALL? 

and then she posts her libels like the above.  If it weren't so comical it would be pitiable. The poor woman is clearly not in touch with reality at all. Publishing articles with false schematics and false claims, fabricating data, lying about circuits in use, refusing to correct her many manifest errors... savaging her former collaborators like Glen, who worked harder than anyone on trying to support her claims with attempts at proper measurements.... Where exactly INDEED? All over the place, for years and years, that's where.


I've been reviewing the old threads. It is very interesting. In one thread from EF I am in the late months of 2009 where Glen has completed his tests and the submission to IEEE has been made, along with some friction entering from Harvey.

Since June of 2009 when I first told them that the Quantum published circuit was wrong, that it did not make the frequency and duty cycle claimed, and that With the claimed duty cycle there will be small heat only, and that the claimed oscillations were a red herring..... it has taken them until late August, early September to realize that each of these things I told them was true. At least four builders determined that the Quantum circuit would not do as claimed (Glen, groundloop (after making circuit boards!), Astweth, Aaron, Joit, and a few others actually built the original circuit faithfully.... and immediately started changing it in various ways to try to get it to do something different than what I told them it would do.)  At least SIX different alternate circuit variations were put forth and tested, and the one that Glen finally settled on operates at over 100 times the frequency of the original, uses a much longer On percentage than originally specified, results in no actual oscillations at all, and results in high heat at the load _and_ the mosfet. And runs the batteries down. Yet they still have their "pdf" which claims that I was wrong about these things.... when it is perfectly clear that I was right and that their "replication" is of a completely different circuit operating at completely different parameters than was claimed in the original Quantum article.

The other thread is on poynt99's OUR, back in February of 2011. This is _after_ Ainslie had released some waveforms and BEFORE she honestly revealed the true schematic she was using, so .99 and others are trying to simulate some waveforms and a continuous oscillation that is coming from a circuit whose schematic is being lied about and concealed by Rosemary Ainslie!