Quote from: d3x0r on May 25, 2014, 03:10:55 PM
Was starting to think I was asking the wrong person also ... ya I missed the schematic that was a couple days ago....
but regarding your scope and resonance, you said ti was a combination of frequencies... so if you change the yellow while the blue is making a spikey red... so you gain/lose spikeyness?[/size]
- Oh I see; I gave up after 10 minutes since there was only a small fraction left, I figured you weren't going to get there.
Are high amps good?

Of course, high amps aren't good. We all try to reduce the consumption to a bear minimum while maintaining the output. I was showing that at certain combination of frequencies the consumption drops dramatically while still producing the same output voltage. Also, if you watch the clip carefully enough you can see me testing the hysteresis and the Bloch wall at some point.
BTW, there is now a HD version of the clip here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2vrfyqmYvU

~A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NVBiY13osE&feature=youtu.be[/font]Wesley

I am from Russia and I live in the United States and I followed this topic for a while. I am fluently bilingual , but I have no time to translate videos or posts. I am sorry.

I want to conduct an experiment:

Instead of dealing with this complex grid of mixed Russian and Western parts, PWM modules, voltage regulators and other strange devices,
I want to build a testing stand where I can plug a transformer in and try to achieve overunity or ferroresonance by tuning few knobs and watching the output on my oscilloscope.

I am not skilled in electronics well enough to decode the circuit that uses a lot of bipolar transistors and other current-controlled devices. Even if I would have been as skilled as StiveP, Avalon, and other members of this forum, I would not spend too much time decoding a circuit that I may not replicate so it works..
Maybe I am wrong.

The experiment will involve:

1) An Arduino microcontroller -- I have to pick a right one for the task.

2) Two AD9850 or AD9851 modules --
what does "*  AD9850 do not have 6 octave, but the AD9851 have." stand for? What is the difference between AD9850 and AD9851?

3) Some means of adjusting frequencies of both modules smoothly, through the microcontroller --
such as a pair of knobs, connected to two rotary encoders or a variable resistors. (2 for 2 DDS boards)

4) Some program with phase shift and synchronisation algorithms that I will have to write.

5) A knob to adjust the phase alignment of two signals.

6) Knobs to tune amplitude of the two generator output signals in an energy-conserving manner. -- saturable reactor transformer or more modern means

7) A set of circuits to convert square wave or sine wave signal output to spike, sawtooth and other shapes on demand, over a wide range of frequencies.

8) Amplifiers that work efficiently with currents and voltages used in the transformer. -- FET/MOSFET or powerful bipolar transistors, maybe appropriate OP AMP ICs.

9) A rectifier circuit.

10) Powerful shunts with analog voltmeters to measure current draw on the input and load test the output of the rectifier.

11) An Oscilloscope -- the only thing that I have

12) Maybe, some feedback for than microcontroller, other than my observation.

As someone who spent a long time in Overunity research online, I realize that some successful inventors that want to bring their ideas to the masses are silenced.

Few more try to sell their ideas and of course financial world doesn't want to support them in any way.
This dates back to the partnership of Nikola Tesla and J.P. Morgan.
I hope that I will not be purged before I can publish positive results.

Also. As I notice, all free energy devices incorporate some kind of a weird transformer and a signal generator. Than there is always a circuit to convert the energy to useful energy, similar to mains AC. Obviously there is also something to power the generator with the output of the circuit.

As time varied, mechanical commutator, electromagnetic machine, saturable reactor, spark gap and transistor means were used in the generator. Therefore voltages and designs varied dramatically. (Saturable reactors are often found inside the weird transformers themselves.)

To get to the fundamental idea that I suspect may be roughly called "ferroresonance", I would like to entirely rule out the generator side of the circuit by making a modern, versatile, custom generator that can synthesize the right frequency and waveform to allow this transformer to show the desired effects.

It may take me a while because of time and financial issues. I am afraid to start building this system because I lack some fundamental knowledge of electronic design.

Is this a wise idea, overall?
I will start a separate thread if you think that this is a wise idea.

Quote from: tarakan on May 27, 2014, 07:22:25 PM
I am not skilled in electronics well enough to decode the circuit that uses a lot of bipolar transistors and other current-controlled devices. Even if I would have been as skilled as StiveP, Avalon, and other members of this forum, I would not spend too much time decoding a circuit that I may not replicate so it works..
Maybe I am wrong.

The experiment will involve:

1) An Arduino microcontroller -- I have to pick a right one for the task.

With such small power circuit it is overkill to use micrcontrollers as they consume much more power themselves than original microchip in delamorto circuit.
Because you have no skils in electronics - you need to find ham radio engineer to assemble working circutis for you or someone else who can do this for you. Otherwise - there are a lot of handful tutorial videos in Youtube for learning radio electronics assembly.


Cheers!

Quote from: T-1000 on May 28, 2014, 05:17:33 AM

With such small power circuit it is overkill to use micrcontrollers as they consume much more power themselves than original microchip in delamorto circuit.
Because you have no skils in electronics - you need to find ham radio engineer to assemble working circutis for you or someone else who can do this for you. Otherwise - there are a lot of handful tutorial videos in Youtube for learning radio electronics assembly.


Cheers!

1) I can power microcontrollers separately and not consider their power consumption in the experiment. The point of the experiment is to design a circuit to prove a point, not to get "overunity". 30 watts is plenty to drive a microcontroller, even a small computer. Versatility is the key. When I find out what I want, I will go for efficiency - design a specific circuit for an output of a specific waveform. This was the original plan, at least.

2) I am skilled enough to design my own simple amplifiers, I prefer FETs. Decoding the circuit that someone else designed is not my thing. This voltage regulator in the video makes me wonder if all those components were placed for a good reason or only because the inventor had them at hand...

Maybe FBI added those components to confuse those who try to replicate the circuit.
All I need to know is what waveform was created under what conditions. Correct? This is where I will need some help.