I'm sorry to say this, but the U.S government, military, corporations and C.I.A are currently the biggest bunch of terrorists on the planet. They put all other terrorist groups to shame!

Quote from: stevewal2 on July 18, 2007, 04:44:33 AM
I'm sorry to say this, but the U.S government, military, corporations and C.I.A are currently the biggest bunch of terrorists on the planet. They put all other terrorist groups to shame!

I tend to agree with you on this. but i also feel they are not capable of orcestrating this. It was too caotic and radical to have the governments fingerprints on it. If it was the government's handywork we wouldn't know about it until they wanted us to know. 

@ring_theory

I bring up the probability to prove a point.

Ask yourself what is the likelyhood of this occuring.

Look at some historical events such as the Reichstag fire

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire
Also Germans never knew anything about what was happening in the concentration camps.
It's truly scary what a government is truly capable when you give it carte blanche.

Now we know it's a probable event that could happen again since it happened in history.
It has happened before and it could happen again (9/11). I'm talking government staged terror events.
Some websites are totally devoted to this.

To prove 9/11 was an inside job is hard to do but it probably was because of probability.
The probability of it being some kind of inside job is very high as shown in previous emails.

I just looked at the fall times. I calculated it myself. It's simple physics.
Woaaah !!! something wrong with that. That's impossible.
My advice is to take out your pen and do the math!

Why worry about what has happened and start worrying about what is about to happen.  Before 911 the government was training for attacks from planes on the trade center and the pentegon.  Either they have a psychic working for them or they knew something about the attacks before they happened.   Either way something smells.

The current administration is in such bad shape right now that the only way to win the support of the American people back is for some catastrophic even to occur so bush can say I told you so.  The american sheeple will be screaming for the administration to attack the terrorists again(They now have a reason for taking out iran for supporting them). 

They are already starting to beat the war drums and are touting that osoma's people are already in the united states and wanting to attack us at home.  Also homeland security has a "gut feeling" that something bad about to happen.  So lets look at what big event the government is training or preparing for now.  The last I heard they are conducting yearly training exercises for a dirty bomb or a nuke going off in the subways of dc.  I think new youk is training for something similar but am not sure.  Also the feds have currently moved their offices out of the range of a possible nuclear bomb going off in dc.

Hopefully it never happens, but if it does this is one possible outcome.  If it does happen you can count on loosing the rest of your freedoms and bush's prolonged term in office. 

Have a nice day  

The Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico says Dr Judy Wood's 9/11 directed energy weapon evidence is "interesting and worthy of further consideration".


Read on...


March 16, 2007: Former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dr Judy Wood files a Request for Correction with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding the 9/11 NIST Report. Dr Wood cites fraud and deception, and shows clear evidence that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weaponry.

Dr Judy Wood is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.

Dr Wood's Request for Correction (RFC) is archived on the US Government's Department of Commerce website in PDF format:

RFC (March 16, 2007):
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_002667

Supplement#1 (March 29, 2007):
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_002722

Supplement#2 (April 20, 2007):
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_002899



April 7, 2007: Dr Wood sends letter to

* The Head of U.S. Air Force Directed Energy Directorate
* The Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director for Management
* The Board of Directors of Directed Energy Professional Society

The main question of this letter: "Are the effects set forth in RFC filed with NIST consistent with the destructive effects that would result from the use of directed energy weapons?"

See here for full letter with additional comments by Jerry Leaphart:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/DEW_letter.html



April 27, 2007: Wood and Leaphart are contacted and have telephone conversation with

The Director of Public Affairs
Directed Energy Directorate
Air Force Research Laboratory/DEO-PA
Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico



May 3 2007: Leaphart sends letter to the Director of Public Affairs:
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070503_letterGarcia.pdf



May 4, 2007: Leaphart receives the following FAX from the Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base (emphasis added):

===================================
MESSAGE: I received your fax yesterday and your FedEx package today, and had a chance to review the materials you sent. During our telephone conversation I outlined a variety of directed energies that might have future weapons applications but I'm not aware of any that are mature enough to cause the damage at the World Trade Center. Lasers are the most likely candidates for nearer-term weapons use and, to that enc, we have conducted laboratory tests to evaluate the effects of laser energy on different materials. For the most part, those materials have been metals, not concrete structures. Effects on metals are from the heat generated by an intense beam of coherent light, which cause the metals to weaken and split. Given sufficient heat, metals would melt (become liquids) and, given significantly more heat, could turn to gases. Since we haven't tested concrete I don't know if the effect would be dust. You report phenomena that we cannot explain here, either because we don't have enough data or because the phenomena are not within our area of expertise. While on a personal level I may find Dr Wood's investigation interesting and worthy of further consideration, on a professional level we are unable to devote our limited resources to activities outside of our charter, I wish you success in your endeavor and am available to answer whatever directed energy questions may arise.
===================================

See here for a scan of the original FAX document:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Garcia_letter.html


Dr Wood's 9/11 directed energy weapon evidence is "interesting and worthy of further consideration"!


--------------------------


June 29, 2007: The Chief of the Management and Organization division at NIST replies to Dr Wood, and states they need more time to respond to her RFC:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_letter.html

NIST needs **more time** ??


--------------------------


See Dr Judy Wood's 9/11 directed energy weapon research here:
http://drjudywood.com