Ja but you still have to show us that textbook catalytic spillover isn't an eternal unchanging power source at least on paper @mark E.we are highly suspicious after the latest romanian museum measurements.

Quote from: profitis on July 06, 2014, 08:29:06 AM
Ja but you still have to show us that textbook catalytic spillover isn't an eternal unchanging power source at least on paper @mark E.we are highly suspicious after the latest romanian museum measurements.

You can allude to some device violating first principles all you want.  You can also howl at the moon.

Ja but you still need to show us that catalytic gas spillover isn't perpetual motion @mark E.

Quote from: profitis on July 06, 2014, 08:29:06 AM
Ja but you still have to show us that textbook catalytic spillover isn't an eternal unchanging power source at least on paper

Only if absence of evidence necessitates evidence of absence.  Since it doesn't, you are kind of left with no argument.

Quote@mark E.we are highly stupid after the latest romanian museum measurements.

Yes.  Yes you are.

Ja but its a textbook principal @sarkeizen.you have to show us how at least on paper its not violation of 2lot.