Quote from: minnie on August 18, 2014, 06:51:24 AM


   If particles don't exist, how can bismuth emit alpha particles?
                       John.

Particles ULTIMATELY do not exist, they're 'stable' dielectric formations


Dielectricity in galactic and intense power stellar formations congregates into fundamental particle creation.


There is only ONE fundamental particle, which you call the neutron,  all "free neutrons" spin up and become protons within , what is it,  17 mins in "free space".   then...... i.e.  Hydrogen.


beta decay, inverse beta decay

protons can become neutrons , and vice versa.


protons are magnetically dominant,   neutrons are dielectrically dominant.



Particle radiation (He nucleus) is not up for debate, obviously.   WHAT the particles themselves ARE ultimately .......IS


matter is created in galactic and stellar formations.



See images of galactic jets.


thats new matter being shot out both "ends"

Quote from: sadang on August 18, 2014, 06:54:46 AM
you and others who are deeply rooted in official magnetism.

...

.....

......
And I know what I mean when I say that science today is the same as religion and is just a dogma and nothing more!

[/b]





Quantum BS is just an insane religion.        To say "virtual photons" = magnetism / action at a distance is NO DIFFERENT THAN SAYING  "Angels and Satan"   "do it"


The only thing separating  quantum BS from the Church of Scientology is 5 degrees of horse-shit of a diff. FLAVOR.

Quote from: sadang on August 18, 2014, 03:38:30 AM
The density of the magnetic flux is dictated by the shape of the physical magnet, so it is clear that a conic magnet, such as the ones used for old magnetron technology, will have different strength at the two ends. But I'm talking about the difference in strength (as I noted in an empirical measurement) between the two poles of a magnet of cylindrical or square shape, essentially a symmetrical magnet.

SaDAng

Actually, your original reply to Floor's post was in regards to comparing the difference in strength between the center/edge of a PM to the center/edge of a similiar EM, and not between the two poles of the same PM, as shown in the image below.  That is why I suggested to do a test with the curl meter also, to see if there were any differences between between the center/edge of a PM and an EM.

Gravock

Quote from: gravityblock on August 18, 2014, 07:18:55 AM
Actually, your original reply to Floor's post was in regards to comparing the difference in strength between the center/edge of a PM to the center/edge of a similiar EM, and not between the two poles of the same PM, as shown in the image below.  That is why I suggested to do a test with the curl meter also, to see if there were any differences between between the center/edge of a PM and an EM.

Gravock

Yes indeed, it was my mistake! Sorry! But of course, I'm also interested in this kind of comparative measurements. And I'll do these and others, whose results will be made public.

SaDAng

 Thanks Ken !!!

I have discovered some new magnetic principles and thanks to you Ken as I am making money on them..

I can't wait till the new updated book will be out..

My friends at Max Plunk are sitting and chewing on all the data that you have posted..

Lurking in done not to disturb you as you are on a mission to destroy "Quantum"  b.s..

There is a war of German legacy to dear old Albert E.  as it's a land mine to step there..

These Dogs will try to destroy you and anyone that validates what you have shown !!!

Staying power is already affecting some as they question old Al...


Ps...
Love all you new video clips..  copy(s) of all the latest are in China already and being targeted for economic value...


MH is a resident trolll... his  weapon is posting nothing else !!!


Latest clip to chew .....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRRy0ekuFWs&feature=youtu.be

Acca..[/font]