Joe:

That posting was basically a repeat of your discussion about renewable energy.  You have been told repeatedly that we are not discussing renewable energy in this thread.  What is your problem?  There is no connection whatsoever between renewable energy and the QEG.

QuoteDude i'm a newbie to this but I find it unbelievable that someone in here with 3386 posts (like you) not capable of seeing what is really going on.

QuoteI seriously find it incredibly hard to understand why you don't understand this simple stuff.

The above comments are nonsensical Straw Man arguments where you are trying to allege that MarkE does not "see" or understand the issues around renewable energy, or issues about the QEG.  That is not true at all.  When you post nonsensical things like that you only hurt your credibility.

QuoteThe intentions of hopegirl are just to unplug yourself from the system...

QuoteHope girl just wants to help the non-technical people where the technical people are just cash cows only.

You have also been told that the QEG does not work, and there is no evidence that it does work.  There is ample evidence that it does not work.  Therefore your two statements above are nonsense.

Please understand, in this discussion you are free to make real points and make your arguments.  But going off topic and talking about renewable energy or making Straw Man arguments about some people or making unsubstantiated allegations about the QEG will not impress anybody.

You have to be real and truthful and stay on topic.  Are you capable of seeing what is really going on?

MileHigh

Quote from: MilesHigher
Joe:

That posting was basically a repeat of your discussion about renewable energy.  You have been told repeatedly that we are not discussing renewable energy in this thread.  What is your problem?  There is no connection whatsoever between renewable energy and the QEG.
...

Please understand, in this discussion you are free to make real points and make your arguments.  But going off topic and talking about renewable energy or making Straw Man arguments about some people or making unsubstantiated allegations about the QEG will not impress anybody.

You have to be real and truthful and stay on topic.  Are you capable of seeing what is really going on?

MileHigh

In the minds of some experimenters there is a
connection, a possible dependency, or an overlap.

Is the human mind capable of "staying on topic?"

Our ability to remain focused seems to be limited.
Even the Great Miles Higher has been known to have
been distracted or for other reasons drift off course
(topic) from time to time.

Broad lines of discussion are often necessary as we
strive to resolve conflicting thoughts or seek
understanding of what seems incomprehensible.

But then, this tends to drive the Thought Police up
the wall...

As the World Turns.

Quote from: mscoffman on September 17, 2014, 02:53:37 PM
Every sun mass star and below emits a neutrino for *each* hydrogen to hydrogen fusion, in the PEP-II pathway. Also exploding NOVA stars only explode because of incredibly copious production of neutrinos drives the explosion forward. So there are a lot of them around.
They carry away the precise angular momentum energy of constituents to the PEP reaction. Neutrinos are normally ghostlike particles that
move though matter with an extremely low probability of interaction. But in a Planck interaction if the reaction needs just the right
amount of energy available to the neutrino the probabilities go out the window and a neutrino supplies it's energy to the reaction.
Enough energy to bond the proton and electron which then merge into a neutron with => no additional energy left over <= a neutron
drifts away and gets absorbed into another local atomic nucleus, increasing it's neutron count by one, if this neutron makes the nucleus
radioactive, the nuclear process fission proceeds to generate heat. Notice that this reaction is not a chain reaction, but is rate limited
by the presence of additional neutrinos and the conditions of other matter. Which atomic nucleus absorbs the drift neutron can be to
some extent dependent on the material configuration around the reaction site.

Question to knowledgeable physicist: Is there systemic balance that is violated if a neutrino is absorbed by a configuration
of electron and proton to create the neutron? If not the reaction is not accidental as the energy of the PEP-II neutrino has
been calculated as exactly what is required to form the electron and proton into a neutron.

    Interesting energy from the aether.   If a hydrogen atom turns into a neutron (due to electron capture in a neutrino rich enviroment) and the neutron decays back into a proton right next to another decaying neutron wouldn't the coulumb barrier problem be overcome?  If there are enough gluons around you get cold fusion-if there aren't you get two protons moving pretty quickly away from each other along with the beta.  The protons slam into stuff and heat it up.  The beta displaces electrons allowing for the protons to stay ionized long enough for the coulumb force to kick in and mutually accelerate the protons.

Sorry SeaMonkey, I am not buying.  Recently you have been pushing "C," "ET," and "J" and making strategic little postings to try to change the subject and get some "action."  Just start your own thread or threads instead.  There is no connection between renewable energy and the QEG and I am pretty damn sure that you know that too.

Quote from: joel321 on September 18, 2014, 04:58:21 AM


Dude i'm a newbie to this but I find it unbelievable that someone in here with 3386 posts (like you) not capable of seeing what is really going on.

After watching videos upon videos showing how "free energy" is gathered from the earth is amazing how you don't believe it is a fact 100%.

Like the hoover damn...all of that energy is "gathered" from the river flow ENERGY only. ...there are a lot of other "over unity" devices out there that have worked since 30 yrs ago (or more).

So, you admit to being a newb to all of this yet you state that free energy from the earth is a fact, 100%?  What do you base this conclusion upon?  Videos?  Replications?

Umm...all dams, like the Hoover dam you mentioned, work as a direct result of solar power...you know....sun heats water...it evaporates and it rains up in the mountains...gravity make it flow down hill...you know this right?

O.U. devices "working for 30 years"????  Where is your evidence for such a silly statement?  Just show us one...just one...that is all we would like to see.  You just claimed that there are "a lot" of them so this should be easy for you to do.  You will not be able to do this because there are NONE.  Not one single device that has been proven to be overunity...period.  So just name one and show the proof and we will all be thrilled.

The QEG has been totally exposed by the smart guys on here as a scam and a fraud, and that it can not do anything like what they have claimed, so, I do hope you do not claim that one as your proven O.U. device.

I do not mean to sound like I am picking on you but, you admit to being new to all of this, and then you make definitive statements which we all know are false, and you call into question a highly intelligent, highly educated, and highly respected member's (MarkE) postings claiming that they are not correct.  This is why I had to respond.

Bill