FREE ENERGY INSTRUKCION  RUSLAN  2014.10.15.
PLYZ TRANSLIACION ENGLIS ...
AUDIO MP3 FILE  http://rusfolder.com/41984651
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL55iHTZSw4

FORUM  http://realstrannik.ru/forum/39-kapanadze/134930-ustanovka-ruslana-kulabuxova.html?start=2556#243673

FORUM http://realstrannik.com/forum/freeenergylt-antanas/4-ustanovka-ruslana-kulabukhova.html#345

Hi, anyone out there that can explain the last post please?

 The topic is now in this link below, it is related to Ruslan Kulabuhov energy device.

Acca...

http://www.overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/msg420835/#new[/font]

Quote from: verpies on June 10, 2013, 04:38:21 PM

Quote from: sparks on June 10, 2013, 01:02:09 PM
They gain velocity from the electric field due to the charge polarization existing between the two capacitor plates. A single electron leaving the parent atom can cause ionization of a second atom which is accelerated causing an electron avalanche.

In order to cause an avalanche, primary electrons have to cause more than one secondary electron emissions from ionized atoms, on average.
Do you think that the collective kinetic energy of the secondary electrons is greater than the primary electron's ? If "yes" - why?

Quote from: sparks on June 11, 2013, 11:27:17 AM
Yes because the secondary electrons are accelerated by the electric field whereas when they were bound they were not. Ionization is a simple conversion of electron mass. Any change in the electron mass is accompanied by radiation. If this radiation is of a wavelength that results in the optimum wavelength for ionization of "receiver" atoms then the first incident photon invested can result in avalanche ionization. This creates a large number of free electrons that respond to the accelerating electric field between charged capacitor plates.

And I think, it is that what happens in this experimental setup.

The two capacitor plates are here the endings of the two sparking wires. When shorting the 506V capacitor(s) without the high voltage connected (via the diode or directly), almost nothing happens. When shorting the 3600V of the secondary coil of the high voltage transformer directly, almost nothing happens. But when shorting the capacitor through an ionized spark gap, hell breaks loose.

The input current during that powerful sparking is around 4A at 12V (48W). Since the high voltage is around 3600V there should be a maximum current of 13.3mA at 3600V (48W) going through that spark gap. But it doesn't look, sound and feel that way, like just 13mA, does it?

Question: What is the difference between a spark gap and a xenon flashtube?

Quote from: verpies on June 10, 2013, 07:02:22 AM

Quote from: baroutologos on June 10, 2013, 02:38:52 AM
IMO, they have been some nice thoughts on the table as NMR in ferrites, ferrites permeatbility alteration via mechanic resonance or whatever, isotopes application of strong specific RF for stimulation of beta decay etc

I noticed that many people think that energy of these devices comes from nothing or vacuum.
The possibility that matter of the device can be converted to energy is considered destructive and generally frowned upon.

Why just matter? Can space itself be converted to energy? Can time itself be converted to energy? Is space-time a particular form of energy? Or maybe matter is simply a particular form of space-time?

You will need some sort of audio vibratory physio molecular transport device.  But you did not hear that from me.