Quote from: allcanadian on December 16, 2014, 11:14:15 PM
@Sark
You seem to get all hot and bothered trying to prove yourself to the point of being obsessed by it.

In this particular case he's trying to deflect attention away from the fact that he fraudulently altered the content of my text...sound like a familiar CDC M.O. ?

QuoteNo offence but instead of spam posting why not try to interact on a more personal level like a real person.

Because he isn't, thats why.

Regards...

Quote from: allcanadian on December 16, 2014, 11:14:15 PMI read the article and found it interesting and informative

Out of curiosity can you give me say two or three things that the article said which were new information to you and were exceptionally well supported?  I mean, that's part of what I'd call "interesting and informative".  Wouldn't you?

Quoteas I said then you spam posted it with equally unsubstantiated claims

If there's a particular part of my post that you believe is unsubstantiated then please.  Simply point it out.  Most of the substantiation for what I said is actually in the article or linked from it.  So if you read it, you didn't read it very well and you certainly didn't follow up on it. As I say though I will happily provide what you think is missing.

QuoteYou seem to get all hot and bothered trying to prove yourself to the point of being obsessed by it

LOL. Then you really are not understanding my posts.  I mean if you're saying that out of everything I posted in response to that you couldn't find one thing that presented a reasonable alternative viewpoint to what the article presented.  That's cool.  I'd love to hear you say so plainly though.

QuoteNo offence but instead of spam posting

No offence but it's simply not spam not under any useful definition.  It's a clear response to what was stated in the article:  The article says X.  The reality is probably more like Y.

QuoteI understand what your saying however I'm not convinced

Dude.  Don't take this the wrong way but you just blather. Seriously I've probably asked you for a half-dozen cites for things you expressed or implied as externally verifiable and you have provided almost nothing (other than urls from drugstores and wall mart which were actually beside the point).  So ask yourself if that's really worth any energy to convince.

QuoteI also liked the logical fallacy bit, lol, I always get a kick out of that because the context is almost never logic or reason but more so narcissism

If you have an actual argument.  Feel free to present it.

Mass Sterilization effort in Kenya.

ok I was editing my post when everyone decided to respond, we might need a re-do, lol.

Quote from: SeaMonkey on December 17, 2014, 12:22:30 AM
Mass Sterilization effort in Kenya.

OK so you've got the alarming claim.  Now, if you dig a little deeper you will find out the claims are nonsense because the vaccine does not contain HCG.  When the vaccine samples were tested at a high quality lab, they registered lower HCG than the tap water.