Acca:

QuoteELECTRIC WATER IN BOTTLE 

Here is the follow up to the first video clip on the charge in the water that has no capacitor plates just the inside and the outside of the water bottle..   This is tap water... conductive  polar charges are attracted to the plastic of inside of the bottle ..

Not quite.  As a kid did you rub balloons against a wall an then leave them stuck to the wall?  That's the essential clue.  To state "ELECTRIC WATER IN BOTTLE" is misleading at best.

QuoteKen, glad you are back the trols are pounding at your door..   these trolls are so stupid !!!!!!
.
.
here is a link to electrical water ( my clip )....Magnetic(ly) charged water through a plasma spinning.. ( a patent is in the works for the plastic dipole charger)...

Wow, so you are "MAGNETVORTEX power" on YouTube.  You are the guy that made all of those YouTube clips with the tank of water and the wires in the water and all of the swirling bubbles and all that.

I have some serious news for you.  Your clips are filled with nonsense because in most cases you haven't the slightest clue what you are talking about.  Your clips are so misguided and so wrong and so awful that they almost hurt to watch.

Now, instead of a near-mindless cheering crowd that doesn't dare challenge you and Kenny and others like on some other forums, at least here you have people that will take issue with you and challenge you if you are stating nonsense.  The challenge from me to you is to "incite you to think."

You see the attached screen cap from one of your clips, "Secret Magnet Glass Vortex."  In that clip you state that you are "proving" the existence of the "magnetic vortex" with that test.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  You clearly have no idea why the bottle cap is spinning.  Things like this are actually shocking sometimes.  Like, you haven't the slightest clue what is happening in the clip and yet you are making an "educational" clip.  When I first came across some of your clips I was shocked.

MileHigh

You forgot to comment on this Kenny:

QuoteI state that a water molecule has an electric dipole moment.  You then call me an "idiot" and then upload a graphic of a water molecule showing an electric dipole moment.  That makes you an idiot.

Doh!

cast bismuth spheres experimenting with.



Variation average between 10 and 13 degrees heat generation.

1. reproducible without fail.
2. logical necessitated HEAT production from magnetic divergence against natures MOST diamagnetic (=dielectric) element, bismuth
3. NECESSITATED output
4. ONLY 2 "parts".
5. NO MOVING PARTS
6. WOULD NEVER EVER BREAK DOWN / FAIL


power anything with it? MORE of them, or a LARGE one.....maybe a dinky flashlight LED.



They (the ubiquitous 'they') only said "FREE ENERGY!!!!!!!!!!",

......they never qualified HOW MUCH of it. 

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on December 22, 2014, 05:48:49 PM

cast bismuth spheres experimenting with.



Variation average between 10 and 13 degrees heat generation.

1. reproducible without fail.
2. logical necessitated HEAT production from magnetic divergence against natures MOST diamagnetic (=dielectric) element, bismuth
3. NECESSITATED output
4. ONLY 2 "parts".
5. NO MOVING PARTS
6. WOULD NEVER EVER BREAK DOWN / FAIL


power anything with it? MORE of them, or a LARGE one.....maybe a dinky flashlight LED.



They (the ubiquitous 'they') only said "FREE ENERGY!!!!!!!!!!",

......they never qualified HOW MUCH of it. 

If the bismuth spheres were truly and consistently 10-13 degrees above ambient (i.e., emitting heat), your thermal imager would see a homogenous temp reading over the entire surface of the sphere.

It appears that you are once again being fooled by the reflection of the heat produced by the imager itself.  A video made using the thermal imager wherein the imager was moved about a bit would also prove that it is reflected heat being observed if the hot spot moves across the surface of the sphere as the imager is moved.  Although taken with only slightly offset imager positions, the two still images provided do tend to indicate that the hot spot does move with the imager position in support of the observed hotspots being only a reflection of the imager's heat.

As can also be done with the "heat generated by a magnet" thermal imager test you did previously, this can easily be confirmed by repeating these tests with an accurate thermocouple taped to the spheres (or magnets).

PW

Quote from: picowatt on December 22, 2014, 09:46:41 PM
your thermal imager would see a homogenous temp reading over the entire surface of the sphere.

nonsense, thats like saying the POT on the stove top should be EVENLY hot both at the top at at the side of the burner.



I see you put "much" thought into your statement.

congrats.